Alveolar process anabolic activity in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/6J inbred mice

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 79, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1255-1262

  Meta, Isaac F ^a   Fernandez, Soledad A ^a   Gulati, Parul ^a   Huja, Sarandeep S ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone; Animal model; Animal studies; Osteon; Remodeling

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REMODELING; C3H MOUSE; C57BL MOUSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HAVERSIAN CANAL; HISTOLOGY; JAW; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METABOLISM; MOLAR TOOTH; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH ROOT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; FEMALE; HAVERSIAN SYSTEM; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MICE; MICE, INBRED C3H; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MOLAR; OSTEOGENESIS; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 47749137358     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070610     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Frost HM. Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Res 1969;3:211-237.
2. Tran Van PT, Vignery A, Baron R. Cellular kinetics of the bone remodeling sequence in the rat. Anat Rec 1982;202:445-451.
3. Huja SS, Fernandez SA, Hill KJ, Li Y. Remodeling dynamics in the alveolar process in skeletally mature dogs. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006;288:1243-1249.
4. Jowsey J. Studies of Haversian systems in man and some animals. J Anat 1966;100:857-864.
5. Hardt AB. Bisphosphonate effects on alveolar bone duringratmolardrifting. J Dent Res 1988;67:1430-1433.
6. Bianco P, Gehron Robey P. Marrow stromal stem cells. J Clin Invest 2000;105:1663-1668.
7. Beamer WG, Donahue LR, Rosen CJ, Baylink DJ. Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice. Bone 1996;18:397-403.
8. Akhter MP, Cullen DM, Pedersen EA, Kimmel DB, Recker RR. Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in two breeds of mice. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;63:442-449.
9. Sheng MH, Baylink DJ, Beamer WG, et al. Histomorphometric studies show that bone formation and bone mineral apposition rates are greater in C3H/HeJ (high-density) than C57BL/6J (low-density) mice during growth. Bone 1999;25:421-429.
10. Meta IF, Fernandez SA, Gulati P, Huja SS. Adaptations in the mandible and appendicular skeleton of high and low bone density inbred mice. Calcif Tissue Int 2007;81:107-113.
11. Beamer WG, Shultz KL, Donahue LR, et al. Quantitative trait loci for femoral and lumbar vertebral bone mineral density in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ inbred strains of mice. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:1195-1206.
12. Baker PJ, Dixon M, Roopenian DC. Genetic control of susceptibility to Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced alveolar bone loss in mice. Infect Immun 2000;68:5864-5868.
13. Al-Rasheed A, Scheerens H, Srivastava AK, Rennick DM, Tatakis DN. Accelerated alveolar bone loss in mice lacking interleukin-10: Late onset. J Periodontal Res 2004;39:194-198.
14. Li CH, Amar S. Morphometric, histomorphometric, and microcomputed tomographic analysis of periodontal inflammatory lesions in a murine model. J Periodontol 2007;78:1120-1128.
15. Verna C, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The rate and the type of orthodontic tooth movement is influenced by bone turnover in a rat model. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:343-352.
16. Turner AS. Animal models of osteoporosis - Necessity and limitations. Eur Cell Mater 2001;1:66-81.
17. Khosla S, Burr D, Cauley J, et al. Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22:1479-1491.
18. Li CY, Schaffler MB, Wolde-Semait HT, Hernandez CJ, Jepsen KJ. Genetic background influences cortical bone response to ovariectomy. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:2150-2158.
19. Parfitt AM. Stereologic basis of bone histomorphometry: Theory of quantitative microscopy and reconstruction of the third dimension. In: Recker RR, ed. Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1983:54-87.
20. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 1987;2:595-610.
21. Kobayashi M, Masuda Y, Fujimoto Y, et al. Electrophysiological analysis of rhythmic jaw movements in the freely moving mouse. Physiol Behav 2002;75:377-385.
22. Shimomoto Y, Chung CJ, Iwasaki-Hayashi Y, Muramoto T, Soma K. Effects of occlusal stimuli on alveolar/jaw bone formation. J Dent Res 2007;86:47-51.
23. Marotti G, De Lena M. Quantitative analysis of the structural reconstruction process in the dog mandible in relation to age. Arch Ital Anat Embriol 1966;71:229-252.
24. de Winter FR, Steendijk R. The effect of a low-calcium diet in lactating rats; observations on the rapid development and repair of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res 1975;17:303-316.
25. Jee WS, Mori S, Li XJ, Chan S. Prostaglandin E2 enhances cortical bone mass and activates intracortical bone remodeling in intact and ovariectomized female rats. Bone 1990;11:253-266.
26. Schaffler MB, Choi K, Milgrom C. Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. Bone 1995;17:521-525.
27. Martin RB. Fatigue microdamage as an essential element of bone mechanics and biology. Calcif Tissue Int 2003;73:101-107.
28. Allen MR, Burr DB. Mineralization, microdamage, and matrix: How bisphosphonates influence material properties of bone. International Bone and Mineral Society 2007;4:49-60.