The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 895-907

  Keil, Thomas ^a   Maula, Markku ^a   Schildt, Henri ^b   Zahra, Shaker A ^c  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Alliance; Business development; Corporate venture capital; Corporate venturing; Innovation, patents

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ITC); INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE (IP); INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS (IORS); JOINT VENTURES (JV);

FINANCE;

EID: 47749115278     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.672     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Aguinis H. 2003. Regression Analysis for Categorical Moderators. Guilford Publications: New York.
2. Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3): 425-455.
3. Ahuja G, Katila R. 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 197-220.
4. Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J. 1995. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal 105(429): 333-344.
5. Blundell R, Griffith R, Windmeijer F. 2002. Individual effects and dynamics in count data models. Journal of Econometrics 108(1): 113-131.
6. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152.
7. Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER working paper no. 7552 National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.
8. Compustat. 2007. Standard & Poor's Compustat Database. McGraw Hill : New York.
9. Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ. 2005a. When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal 26(10): 947-965.
10. Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ. 2005b. When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy 34(5): 615-639.
11. Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41(1): 61-84.
12. Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M. 2003. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy 32(8): 1365-1379.
13. Haleblian J, Finkelstein S. 1999. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: a behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1): 29-56.
14. Hall BH. 2005. Exploring the patent explosion. Journal of Technology Transfer 30(1/2): 35-48.
15. Hall BH, Ziedonis RH. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. Rand Journal of Economics 32(1): 101-128.
16. Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z. 1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4): 909-938.
17. Hill CWL, Rothaermel FT. 2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy Of Management Review 28(2): 257-274.
18. Inkpen AC, Crossan MM. 1995. Believing is seeing: joint ventures and organization learning. Journal of Management Studies 32(5): 595-618.
19. Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal 19(3): 193-210.
20. Koza MP, Lewin AY. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 255-264.
21. Lane PJ, Lubatkin M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19(5): 461-477.
22. Long JS, Freese J. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, (2nd edn). Stata Press: College Station, Texas.
23. Markides CC, Williamson PJ. 1996. Corporate diversification and organizational structure: a resourcebased view. Academy of Management Journal 39(2): 340-367.
24. Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 77-91.
25. Nicholls-Nixon CL, Woo CY. 2003. Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal 24(7): 651-666.
26. Osborn RN, Baughn CC. 1990. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Academy of Management Journal 33(3): 503-519.
27. Ranft AL, Lord MD. 2002. Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science 13(4): 420-441.
28. Rothaermel FT. 2001. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, June-July Special Issue 22: 687-699.
29. Rothaermel FT, Hess AM. 2007. Building dynamic capabilities: innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science 18(6): 898-921.
30. Sapienza HJ, Parhankangas A, Autio E. 2004. Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing 19(6): 809-829.
31. Schildt H, Maula M, Keil T. 2005. Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(4): 493-515.
32. Shenkar O, Li J. 1999. Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organization Science 10(2): 134-143.
33. StataCorp. 2005. Stata Base Reference Manual: Release 9/. StataCorp LP: College Station, TX.
34. Stuart TE. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal 21(8): 791-811.
35. Thomson-Derwent. 2002. Thomson Derwent World Patents Index. Thomson Financial: New York.
36. Thomson-SDC. 2007. Thomson-Securities Data Corporation SDC Platinum Database. Thomson Financial: New York.
37. Villalonga B, McGahan AM. 2005. The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures. Strategic Management Journal 26(13): 1183-1208.
38. Windmeijer F. 2002. ExpEnd, A Gauss Programme for Non-Linear GMM Estimation of Exponential Models with Endogenous Regressors for Cross Section and Panel Data. CEMMAP working paper no. CWP 14/02. Institute for Fiscal Studies, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice: London, UK. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=340323 (accessed 12 Janury 2007).