Sentence similarity based on dynamic time warping

ICSC 2007 International Conference on Semantic Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 250-256

  Liu, Xiaoying ^a   Zhou, Yiming ^a   Zheng, Ruoshi ^b  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CIeNET Technologies (Beijing) Co Ltd

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; SEMANTICS;

DYNAMIC TIME WARPING; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; NOVEL METHODS; SEMANTIC INFORMATION; SENTENCE LENGTH; SENTENCE SIMILARITY; SIMILARITY MEASURING;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 47749109876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2007.48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. Berndt and D. Clifford. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Database, pages 229-248, 1994.
2. E. Caiani, A. Porta, G. Baselli, M. Turiel, S. Muzzupappa, F. Pieruzzi, C. Crema, A. Malliani, and S. Cerutti. Warped-average template technique to track on a cycle-by-cycle basis the cardiac filling phases on left ventricular volume. IEEE Computers in Cardiology, 25, 1998.
3. G. Erkan and D. Radev. Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Artificial Intelligence Research, 22:457-479, January 2004.
4. P. Foltz, W. Kintsch, and T. Landauer. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3):285-307, 1998.
5. V. Hatzivassiloglou, J. Klavans, and E. Eskin. Detecting text similarity over short passages: Exploring linguistic feature combinations via machine learning. Proc. Joint SIGDAT Conf. Empirical Methods in NLP and Very Large Corpora, 1999.
6. Y. Ko, J. Park, and J. Seo. Improving text categorization using the importance of sentences. Information Processing and Management, 40:65-79, January 2004.
7. Z. Kovacs-Vajna. A fingerprint verification system based on triangular matching and dynamic time warping. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(11):1266-1276, November 2000.
8. Y. Li, Z. A. Bandar, and D. McLean. An approach for measuring semantic similarity using multiple information sources. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., 15(4):871-882, July/August 2003.
9. Y. Li, D. McLean, Z. A. Bandar, J. D. O'Shea, and K. Crockett. Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., 18(8):1138-1150, August 2006.
10. Y. Liu and C. Zong. Example-based chinese-english mt. Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1-7:6093-6096, 2004.
11. F. Mandreoli, R. Martoglia, and P. Tiberio. A syntactic approach for searching similarities within sentences. CIKM, pages 656-637, November 2002.
12. C. Meadow, B. Boyce, and D. Kraft. Text Information Retrieval Systems, second ed. Academic Press, 2000.
13. G. Miller. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39-41, 1995.
14. G. Miller and W. Charles. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1):1-28, 1991.
15. H. Rubenstein and J. B. Goodenough. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 8:627-633, 10 1965.
16. G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing: the Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Wokingham, Mass.:Addison-Wesley, 1989.
17. J. Sinclair. Collins Cobuild English Dictionary for Advanced Learners, third ed. Harper Collins Pub., 2001.
18. H. Vullings, M. Verhaegen, and H. Verbruggen. Electrocardiogram segmentation using time-warping. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, pages 275-285, 1997.