Organizational rhetoric: Bridging management and communication scholarship

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-12

  Sillince, John A A ^a   Suddaby, Roy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47749101777     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: 15526798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318908318264     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Organization Studies, 53(9), 1125-1149.
2. Barker, J.R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.
3. Barley, S.R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363-399.
4. Bitzer, L.F. (1999). The rhetorical situation. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 217-225). New York: Guilford.
5. Burke, K. (1968). Counter-statement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143-158.
7. Conrad, C., & Malphers, R. (2008). Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 123-146.
8. Feldman, M.S., & Skoldberg, K. (2002). Stories and the rhetoric of contrariety: Subtexts of organizing (change). Culture and Organization, 8(4), 275-292.
9. Green, S., Jr. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653-669.
10. Green, S., Jr., Babb, M., & Alpaslan, C.M. (2008). Institutional field dynamics and the competition between institutional logics: The role of rhetoric in the evolving control of the modern corporation. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 40-73.
11. Hartelius, E.J., & Browning, L.D. (2008). The application of rhetorical theory in managerial research: A literature review. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 13-39.
12. Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 755-778.
13. Jarzabkowski, P., & Sillince, J.A.A. (2007). A rhetorical approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28(11), 1639-1666.
14. McLoughlin, I., & Badham, R. (2005). Political process perspectives on organization and technological change. Human Relations, 58, 827-843.
15. Orlikowski, W.J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: Examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.
16. Sillince, J.A.A. (2005). A contingency theory of rhetorical congruence. Academy of Management Review, 30 (3), 608-621.
17. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
18. Symon, G. (2008). Developing the political perspective on technological change through rhetorical analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 74-98.
19. Tompkins, P.K. (1987). Translating organizational theory: Symbolism over substance. In F. J. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 70-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Whittle, A., Mueller, F., & Mangan, A. (2008). "In search of subtlety": Discursive devices and rhetorical competences. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 99-122.