Effects of binocular suppresssion on surround suppression

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Cai, Yongchun ^a,b   Zhou, Tiangang ^a   Chen, Lin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Binocular suppression; Psychophysics; Surround suppression

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; HAPLORHINI; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD;

ANIMALS; HAPLORHINI; NEURAL INHIBITION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 47749098513     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.9.9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allman, J., Miezin, F., & McGuinness, E. (1985). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 8, 407-430.
2. Angelucci, A., & Bressloff, P. C. (2006). Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. Progress in Brain Research, 154, 93-120.
3. Bair, W., Cavanaugh, J. R., & Movshon, J. A. (2003). Time course and time-distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 7690-7701.
4. Blake, R. (1995). Psychoanatomical strategies for studying human visual perception. In T. V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, & E. Kowler (Eds.), Early vision and beyond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature, 249, 488-490.
6. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-23.
7. Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Raissian, T. A., & Chong, S. C. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 4783-4788.
8. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
9. Cannon, M. W., & Fullenkamp, S. C. (1991). Spatial interactions in apparent contrast - Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial-frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Research, 34, 1985-1998.
10. Chubb, C., Sperling, G., & Solomon, J. A. (1989). Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 86, 9631-9635.
11. DeAngelis, G. C., Freeman, R. D., & Ohzawa, I. (1994). Length and width tuning of neurons in the cats primary visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 347-374.
12. DeAngelis, G. C., Robson, J. G., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. (1992). Organization of suppression in receptive-fields of neurons in cat visual-cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 68, 144-163.
13. Freeman, T. C., Durand, S., Kiper, D. C., & Carandini, M. (2002). Suppression without inhibition in visual cortex. Neuron, 35, 759-771.
14. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
15. Heeger, D. J. (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 181-197.
16. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 229-289.
17. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
18. Kim, C. Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible 'invisible.' Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381-388.
19. King-Smith, P. E., Grigsby, S. S., Vingrys, A. J., Benes, S. C., & Supowit, A. (1994). Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method - Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Research, 34, 885-912.
20. Lamme, V. A. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1605-1615.
21. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1044-1053.
22. Lehky, S. R., & Maunsell, J. H. (1996). No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 36, 1225-1234.
23. Lehmkuhle, S. W., & Fox, R. (1975). Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 15, 855-859.
24. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
25. Li, B. W., Peterson, M. R., Thompson, J. K., Duong, T., & Freeman, R. D. (2005). Cross-orientation suppression: Monoptic and dichoptic mechanisms are different. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 1645-1650.
26. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1801-1818.
27. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763.
28. Meese, T. S., & Hess, R. F. (2004). Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. Journal of Vision, 4 (10):2, 843-859, http://journalofvision.org/4/10/2/, doi:10.1167/4.10.2.
29. Moradi, F., Koch, C., & Shimojo, S. (2005). Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron, 45, 169-175.
30. Ozeki, H., Sadakane, O., Akasaki, T., Naito, T., Shimegi, S., & Sato, H. (2004). Relationship between excitation and inhibition underlying size tuning and contextual response modulation in the cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1428-1438.
31. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 15, 2142-2148.
32. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
33. Petrov, Y., Carandini, M., & McKee, S. (2005). Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8704-8707.
34. Petrov, Y., & McKee, S. P. (2006). The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity. Journal of Vision, 6(3):4, 224-238, http://journalofvision.org/ 6/3/4/, doi:10.1167/6.3.4.
35. Rao, V. M. (1977). Tilt illusion during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 17, 327-328.
36. Seriès, P., Lorenceau, J., & Fregnac, Y. (2003). The "silent" surround of V1 receptive fields: Theory and experiments. The Journal of Physiology, 97, 453-474.
37. Stettler, D. D., Das, A., Bennett, J., & Gilbert, C. D. (2002). Lateral connectivity and contextual interactions in macaque primary visual cortex. Neuron, 36, 739-750.
38. Supèr, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2001). Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1). Nature Neuroscience, 4, 304-3 10.
39. Takeuchi, T., & De Valois, K. K. (2000). Modulation of perceived contrast by a moving surround. Vision Research, 40, 2697-2709.
40. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
41. Wade, N. J. (1980). The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt illusion. Vision Research, 20, 229-233.
42. Webb, B. S., Dhruv, N. T., Solomon, S. G., Tailby, C., & Lennie, P. (2005). Early and late mechanisms of surround suppression in striate cortex of macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11666-11675.
43. Wiesenfelder, H., & Blake, R. (1990). The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3880-3888.
44. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.
45. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.
46. Xing, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 40, 3065-3072.
47. Yu, C., & Levi, D. M. (2000). Surround modulation in human vision unmasked by masking experiments. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 724-728.