The role of speech perception capacities in early language acquisition

Mind, Brain, and Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 61-84

  Jusczyk, Peter W ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47649119876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. Aslin, R.N., Juscyk, P W, & Pisoni, D.B. (1997). Speech and auditory processing during infancy. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, (5th ed., Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, & language, pp. 147-198). New York: Wiley.
2. Bahrick, L E., & Pickens, J.N. (1988). Classification of bimodal English and Spanish language passages by infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 277-296.
3. Best, C.T. (1991). Phonetic influences on the perception of non-native speech contrasts by 6-8 and 10-12 month olds. Paper presented at the Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
4. Best, C.T. (1995). Learning to perceive the sound patterns of English. In C. Rovee-Collier & L.P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 217-304). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Best, C.T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N.M. (1988). Examination of the perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 345-360.
6. Bolinger, D.L., & Gerstman, L.J. (1957). Disjuncture as a cue to constraints. Word, 13, 246-255.
7. Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (1997), Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments. Cognition, 65, 33-69.
8. Braine, M.D.S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure. Language, 39, 1-13.
9. Brent, M.R. (1999). Speech segmentation and word discovery: A computational perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 294-300.
10. Brent, M.R., & Cartwright, T.A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93-125.
11. Brown, R., Cazden, C., & Bellugi, U. (1969). The child's grammar from I to III. In J.P. Hill (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. II, pp. 28-73), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Brown, R., & Eraser, C. (1964). The acquisition of syntax. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29, 9-34.
13. Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. (1997). Bootstrapping word boundaries: A bottom- up corpus-based approach to speech segmentation. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 111-153.
14. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Christiansen, M.H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues; A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, pp. 221-268.
17. Church, K.W. (1987). Phonological parsing in speech recognition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In G.T. M. Altman (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspective (pp. 105-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Cutler, A. (1994). Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions. Lingua, 92, 81-104.
20. Cutler, A., & Carter, D.M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142.
21. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D.G., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
22. Cutler, A., & Morris, D. G, (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
23. Echols, C.H., Crowhurst, M.J., & Childers, J.B. (1997). Perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 202-225.
24. Echols, C.H., & Newport, E.L. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition, 2, 189-220.
25. Eimas, P.D. (1975). Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-l] distinction by infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 341-347.
26. Eimas, P.D., & Miller, J.L. (1980a). Contextual effects in infant speech perception. Science, 209, 1140-1141.
27. Eimas, P.D., & Miller, J.L. (1980b). Discrimination of the information for manner of articulation. Infant Behavior & Development, 3, 367-375.
28. Eimas, P.D., Siqueland, E.R., Jusczyk, P.W., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303-306.
29. Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In E. Lenneberg (Ed,), New directions in the study oflanguage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Femald, A., Pinto, J. E, Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G.W. (1998). Rapid gains in the speed of verbal processing in the second year. Psychological Science, 9, 228-231.
31. Fisher, C.L., & Tokura, H. (1996). Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: Cross-linguistic evidence. Child Development, 67, 3192-3218.
32. Friederici, A.D., & Wessels, J.M. I. (1993), Phonotactic knowledge and its use in infant speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 287-295.
33. Gerken, L.A. (1994). Young children's representation of prosodic phonology: Evidence from Englishspeakers' weak syllable omissions. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 19-38.
34. Gerken, L.A., Jusczyk, E W., & Mandel, D.R. (1994). When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: Nine-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases. Cognition, 51, 237-265.
35. Gerken, L.A., Landau, B., & Remez, R.E. (1990). Function morphemes in young children's speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology, 25, 204-216.
36. Gleitman, L., Gleitman, H., Landau, B., & Wanner, E. (1988). Where the learning begins: Initial representations for language learning. In E Newmeyer (Ed.), The Cambridge linguistic survey (Vol. 3, pp. 150-193). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Gleitman, L., & Wanner, E, (1982). The state of the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Ed.), Language acquisition: The state of the an (pp. 3-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Grieser, D., & Kuhl, P.K. (1989). The categorization of speech by infants: Support for speechsound prototypes. Developmental Psychology, 25, 577-588.
39. Hillenbrand, J.M., Minifie, F.D., & Edwards, T.J. (1979). Tempo of spectrum change as a cue in speech sound discrimination by infants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 147-165.
40. Hirsh-Fasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D.G., Jusczyk, P.W., Wright Cassidy, K., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26, 269-286.
41. Hockett, C.F. (1958). A course in modem linguistics. New York; Macmillan.
42. Hohne, E.A., & Jusczyk, P W. (1994). Two-month-old infants' sensitivity to allophonic differences. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 613-623.
43. Jusczyk, P.W. (1977). Perception of syllable-final stops by two-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 450-454.
44. Jusczyk, P.W. (1985). On characterizing the development of speech perception. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 199-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Juscyk, P.W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Juscyk, P.W. (1999). How infants begin to extract words from fluent speech. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 323-328.
47. Jusczyk, P.W., & Aslin, R.N. (1995). Infants' detection of sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-23.
48. Jusczyk, P.W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. (1993). Perference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Psychology, 64, 675-687.
49. Jusczyk, P.W., Friederici, A. D, Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V Y, & Jusczyk, A.M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402-420.
50. Jusczyk, P.W, Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D, G, Kennedy, L., Woodward, A., & Piwoz, J. (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 252-293.
51. Jusczyk, P.W. & Hohne, E.A. (1997). Infants' memory for spoken words. Science, 277, 1984-1986.
52. Jusczyk, P W., Hohne, E.A., & Bauman, A. (1999). Infants' sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1465-1476.
53. Jusczyk, P.W, Houston, D.M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159-207
54. Jusczyk, P.W, Luce, P.A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630-645
55. Jusczyk, P.W, Pisoni, D.B., & Mullennix, J. (1992). Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants. Cognition, 43, 253-291.
56. Katz, J.J, (1966), The philosophy of language. NewYork: Harper.
57. Kemler Nelson, D.G., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Jusczyk, E W., & Wright Cassidy, K. (1989). How prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning. Journal of Child Language, 16, 55-68.
58. Klatt, D.H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phoenetics, 7, 279-312.
59. Klatt, D.H. (1986), The problem of variability in speech recognition an in models of speech perception. In J.S. Perkell & D.H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes, (pp. 300-319), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Klatt, D.R (1989). Review of selected models of speech perception. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical Representation and Process (pp. 169-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Kuhl, E K. (1979). Speech perception in early infancy: Perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimiliar vowel categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 66, 1668-1679.
62. Kuhl, E K. (1983). Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, 263-285.
63. erceP"l magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93107
64. Kuhl, P.K., Williams, K.A. Lacerda, E, Stevens, K.N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistics experiences alter phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606-608.
65. Lasky, R.E., Syrdal-Lasky, A., & Klein, R.E. (1975). VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 215-225.
66. Lehiste, I. (1960). An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. New York: S. Karger.
67. Liberman, A.M., & Studdert-Kennedy, M.G. (1978), Phoenetic perception. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H.L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Perception (Vol. 8, pp. 143-178). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
68. Leiberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172-179.
69. Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word, 21, 40-54.
70. Mandel, D.R., Jusczyk, P W., & Kemler Nelson, D.G. (1994). Does sentential prosody help infants to organize and remember speech information? Cognition, 53, 155-180.
71. Mandel, D.R., Kemler Nelson, D, G., & Jusczyk, E W (1996). Infants remember the order of words in a spoken sentence. Cognitive Development, 11, 181-196.
72. Mattys, S., Jusczyk, E W, Luce, E A, & Morgan, J.L. (1999). Word segmentation in infants: How phonotactics and prosody combine. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 464-465.
73. McNeill, D. (1966). Developmental psycholinguistics. In F. Smith & G.A. Miller (Eds.), The genesis of language (pp. 15-84). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
74. Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., & Segui, J. (1990). Constraining models of lexical access: The onset of word recognition. G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing, (pp. 236-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Mehler, J., Jusczyk, E W., Lambertz, G., Halstead, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988)'. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 144-178.
76. Miller, J.L., & Eimas, E D. (1983). Studies on the categorization of speech by infants. Cognition, 13, 135-165.
77. Moffitt, A. R. (1971). Consonant cue perception by twenty-to-twenty-four week old infants. Child Development, 42, 717-731
78. Moon, C., Cooper, R. E, & Fifer, W E (1993). Two-day old infants prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 495-500.
79. Morgan, J.L. (1986). From simple input to complex, grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Morgan, J.L. (1994). Converging measures of speech segmentation in prelingual infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 17, 387-400.
81. Morgan, J.L. (1996). A rhythmic bias in preverbal speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 666-688.
82. Morgan, J.L., Meier, R. E, & Newport, E.L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language? Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498-550.
83. Morgan, J.L., & Saffran, J.R. (1995). Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. Child Development, 66, 911-936.
84. Morse, E A. (1972). The discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 477-492.
85. Myers, J., Jusczyk, P W, Kemler Nelson, D.G., Charles-Luce, J., Woodward, A., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1996). Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech. Journal of Child Language, 23, 1-30.
86. Nazzi, T, Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Towards an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
87. Nazzi, X, Jusczyk, P W., & Johnson, E.K. (2000). Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 1-19.
88. Nazzi, T, Kemler Nelson, D.G., Jusczyk, E W, & Jusczyk, A.M. (2000). Six-month-olds' detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: Effects of prosodic well-formedness. Infancy, 1, 123-147.
89. Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
90. Pegg, J.E., & Werker, J.F. (1997). Adult and infant perception of two English phones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3742-3753.
91. Peters, A. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Polka, L., & Bohn, O.S. (1996). Cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English- learning and German-learning infants. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 100, 577-592.
93. Polka, L., & Werker, J. E (1994). Developmental changes in perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421-435.
94. Roeper, T., & Williams, E. (Eds.). (1987). Parameter setting. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
95. Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N., & Newport, E.L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
96. Safftan, J.R., Newport, E.L., & Aslin, R.N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
97. Santelmann, L., & Jusczyk, P.W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69, 105-134.
98. Schafer, G., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rapid word learning by 15-month-old infants under tightly controlled conditions. Child Development, 69, 309-320.
99. Selkirk, E.O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
100. Shady, M.E. (1996). Infants-sensitivity to function morphemes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
101. Shafer, V, Gerken, L.A., Shucard, J., & Shucard, D. (1992, November). "The" and the brain: An electrophysiological study of infants sensitivity to English function morphemes. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston
102. Streeter, L.A. (1976). Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature, 259, 39-41.
103. Suomi, K. (1993). An outline of a developmental model of adult phonological organization and behavior, Journal of Phonetics, 21, 29-60.
104. Singley, D., Pinto, J. P, & Fernald, A. (1998). Assessing the speed and accuracy ofword recognition in infants. In C. Rovee-Collier, L.P.Lipsitt, & H. Hayne (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 12, pp. 257-277). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
105. Swingley, D., Pinto, J.P, & Fernald, A. (1999). Continuous processing in word recognition at 24-months. Cognition, 71, 73-108.
106. Swoboda, P, Morse, P A., & Leavitt, L.A. (1976), Continuous vowel discrimination in normal and at-risk infants. Child Development, 47, 459-465.
107. Tincoff, R., Santelmann, L., & Jusczyk, P (2000). Auxiliary verb learning and 18-month-olds' acquisition of morphological relationships. In S.C. Howell, S.A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 726-737). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
108. Trehub, S.E. (1973). Infants' sensitivity to vowel and tonal contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 9, 91-96.
109. Trehub, S.E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47, 466-472.
110. Werker, J. E, & Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49-63.