Unsupervised naive Bayes for data clustering with mixtures of truncated exponentials

Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, PGM 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 123-130

  Gámez, José A ^a   Rumí, Rafael ^b   Salmerón, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION; DATA AUGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; DATA CLUSTERING; FEATURE VARIABLE; GAUSSIAN MODEL; MIXTURES OF TRUNCATED EXPONENTIALS; NAIVE BAYES; NAIVE BAYES MODELS; NUMBER OF CLASS; SYNTHETIC DATABASE; UNSUPERVISED DATA;

CLASSIFIERS;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 47649103246     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. M.R. Anderberg. 1973. Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press.
2. P. Cheeseman and J. Stutz. 1996. Bayesian classification (AUTOCLASS): Theory and results. In U. M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P Smyth, and R. Uthurusamy, editors, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 153-180. AAAI Press/MIT Press.
3. B.R. Cobb, P.P. Shenoy, and R. Rumí. 2006. Approximating probability density functions with mixtures of truncated exponentials. Statistics and Computing, In press.
4. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1(39):1-38.
5. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, and D.J. Stork. 2001. Pattern Recognition. Wiley.
6. N. Friedman. 1998. The Bayesian structural EM algorithm. In Gregory F. Cooper and Serafín Moral, editors, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98), pages 129-138. Morgan Kaufmann.
7. J.A. Ǵamez. 2005. Mining the ESROM: A study of breeding value prediction in manchego sheep by means of classification techniques plus attribute selection and construction. Technical Report DIAB-05-01-3, Computer Systems Department. University of Castilla-La Mancha.
8. A.K. Jain, M.M. Murty, and P.J. Flynn. 1999. Data clustering: a review. ACM COmputing Surveys, 31(3):264-323.
9. G. Karciauskas. 2005. Learning with hidden variables: A parameter reusing approach for tree-structured Bayesian networks. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science. Aalborg University.
10. D. Lowd and P. Domingos. 2005. Naive bayes models for probability estimation. In ICML '05: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, pages 529-536. ACM Press.
11. S. Moral, R. Rumí, and A. Salmeŕon. 2001. Mixtures of truncated exponentials in hybrid Bayesian networks. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, volume 2143, pages 135-143.
12. D.J. Newman, S. Hettich, C.L. Blake, and C.J. Merz. 1998. UCI Repository of machine learning databases. www.ics.uci.edu/∼mlearn/MLRepository.html.
13. J.M. Peña, J.A. Lozano, and P. Larrañaga. 2000. An improved bayesian structural EM algorithm for learning bayesian networks for clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters, 21:779-786.
14. V. Romero, R. Rumí, and A. Salmeŕon. 2006. Learning hybrid Bayesian networks using mixtures of truncated exponentials. Inernational Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 42:54-68.
15. C. Shenoy and P.P. Shenoy. 1999. Bayesian network models of portfolio risk and return. In W. Lo Y.S. Abu-Mostafa, B. LeBaron and A.S. Weigend, editors, Computational Finance, pages 85-104. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. M.A. Tanner and W.H Wong. 1987. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82:528-550.
17. I.H. Witten and E. Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann.