Implementing interoperability standards for electronic government: An exploratory case study of the E-PING Brazilian framework

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 103-112

  dos Santos, Ernani Marques ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electronic government; Interoperability; IS integration; IT in public administration; Standardization; Standards

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INTEGRATION; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; STANDARDIZATION; STANDARDS;

CONTENT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT; EXPLORATORY CASE STUDIES; INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORK; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; STANDARDIZATION PROCESS; SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 47649100376     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2008070106     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Akbulut, A. (2003). An investigation of the factors that influence electronic information sharing between state and local agencies. PhD Dissertation Thesis. Louisiana State University.
2. Andersen, D. & Dawes, S.(1991). Government information management. A primer and casebook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. David, P.; Greenstein, S. (1990). The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research. The Economics of Innovations and New Technology, 1 (1-2), 3-41.
4. David, P. & Steinmueller, W. (1994). Economics of compatibility standards and competition in telecommunication networks. Information Economics and Policy, 6(3-4):217-241.
5. Dawes, S. (1996). Interagency information sharing: expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3):377-394.
6. Dawes, S.; Bloniarz, P. (2001). Knowledge networking in the public sector New York: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY.
7. e-GIF-e-Government Interoperability Framework. (2004). Office of the e-Envoy - Cabinet Office, UK.
8. e-PING - Padrões de interoperabilidade de governo eletrônico. (2006). Comitê executivo de governo eletrônico - Governo Brasileiro.
9. EPAN - European Public Administration Network. (2004). Key principles of an interoperability architecture. Ireland, 2004.
10. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2000). Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Sponsoring of Common Technological Standards: The Case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal.
11. Graham, I., Spinardi, G., Williams, R., Webster, J. (1995). The Dynamics of EDI Standard Development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7(1): 3-20, 1995.
12. Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1998). Standards and standardization processes. In: Understanding information infrastructure, (manuscrito).
13. Landsbergen Jr, D., & Wolken Jr, G. (2001). Realizing the promise: government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 61(2):205-218, march/april.
14. Rocheleau, B. (1997). Governmental information systems problems and failures: a preliminary review. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 2(3).
15. Tassey, G. (2000). Standardization in technology-based markets. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 587-602.
16. Williams, R. (1997). Universal Solutions or Local Contingencies: Tensions and Contradictions in the Mutual Shaping of Technology and Work Organisation. Innovation Organizational Change and Technology. I. McLoughlin and D. Mason. London, International Thompson Business Press: 170-185.
17. Williams, R.; Bunduchi, R.; Gerst, M.; Graham, L; Pollock, N.; Procter, R.; VoB, A. (2004). Understanding the evolution of standards: alignment and reconfiguration in standards development and implementation arenas. Proceedings of the 4S & EASST Conference. Paris, 2004.