Factors influencing the temporal diffusion of broadband adoption: Evidence from Oklahoma

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 661-679

  Whitacre, Brian E ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; INTERNET; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION; TELECOMMUNICATION;

NORTH AMERICA; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 47649098072     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-007-0178-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Armstrong B (2005) DSL services available to all Oklahoma Residents by 2007. J Rec December 15, 2005
2. Aron D, Burnstein D (2003) Broadband adoption in the United States: An empirical analysis. In: ShamSine A (ed) Down to the wire: studies in the diffusion and regulation of telecommunication technologies
3. Associated Press (2007) Oil and gas industry lifts Oklahoma economy. 28 March 2007
4. Blinder A (1973) Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural variables. J Human Resourc 8: 436-455
5. Byers A (2006) Communities address technology-related development. Tangents: Technologies across Nebraska Newsletter, Winter 2006
6. Carter R (2003) SBC begins $300 million Internet service expansion. J Rec 30 April 2003
7. Coleman B (2004) Minnesota project promotes broadband. Tangents: technologies across Nebraska Newsletter, Summer 2004
8. Cooper M, Kimmelman G (1999) The digital divide confronts the telecommunications act of 1996. Consumer Federation of America, Washington, DC
9. Denni M, Gruber H (2005) The diffusion of broadband telecommunications: the role of competition. Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=82950. Downloaded 4 Jan. 2007
10. Fairlie R (2003) An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Paper Number 873, Economic Growth Center, Yale University
11. Federal Communications Commission - Industry Analysis and Technology Division (2006) High-speed Service for Internet Access: Status as of June 30, 2006. http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. Downloaded 3 Oct. 2007
12. Flamm K, Chaudhuri A (2007) An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Telecommun Policy 31: 312-326
13. Glasmeier A, Wood L (2003) Broadband Internet service in rural and urban Pennsylvania: A commonwealth or digital divide? Report generated for the Center for Rural Pennsylvania. http://www.ruralpa.org/ broadband_report.pdf. Downloaded 1 May 2007
14. Government Accountability Office (2006) Broadband deployment is extensive throughout the United States, but it is difficult to assess the extent of deployment gaps in rural areas. Report to Congressional Committees GAO-06-426. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-426. Downloaded 11 May 2006
15. Grubesic T (2003) Inequities in the broadband revolution. Ann Reg Sci 37: 263-289
16. Hall R, Lehr W (2002) Promoting broadband investment and avoiding monopoly. http://www.sandhillecon.com/
17. Horrigan J (2005) Broadband adoption at home in the United States: growing but slowing. PEW Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
18. Horrigan J (2005) Rural broadband Internet use. PEW Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
19. Horrigan J (2006) Home broadband adoption 2006. PEW Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
20. Horrigan J (2007) Home broadband adoption 2007. PEW Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
21. Horrigan J (2007) Why it will be hard to close the broadband divide. PEW Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
22. Le A, Miller P (2004) Inter-temporal decompositions of labour market and social outcomes. Australian Econ Papers, March 10-20
23. Mills B, Whitacre B (2003) Understanding the metropolitan - non-metropolitan digital divide. Growth Change 34(2): 219-244
24. National Cable and Telecommunications Association (2004) Industry overview. http://www.ncta.com/Docs/pagecontent.cfm?pageID=96. Downloaded 2 Oct. 2007
25. National Exchange Carrier Association (2006) Trends 2006: Making progress with broadband. Whippany, NJ. http://www.neca.org/media/ trends_brochure_website.pdf. Downloaded 20 June 2007
26. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and Economics Statistics Administration (2002) How Americans Are expanding their use of the Internet. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
27. Oaxaca R (1973) Male-female differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14: 693-709
28. Page D (2006) Oklahoma's oil and gas economy has doubled. J Rec (Oklahoma City), 4 May 2006
29. Prentice R (1976) A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose-response curves. Biometrics 32: 761-768
30. Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
31. Rogers E, Shoemaker F (1971) Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach, 2nd edn. Free Press, New York
32. Rose R (2003) Oxford Internet survey results. The Oxford Internet Institute, The University of Oxford, UK
33. Strover S (2001) Rural Internet connectivity. Telecommun Policy 25: 331-347
34. Strover S (2003) The prospects for broadband deployment in rural America. GovernmentInform Quart 20: 95-106
35. Tarde G (1903) The laws of imitation. Translated by E.C. Parsons with introduction by F. Giddings, Henry, Holt and Co., New York
36. Whitacre B, Mills B (2007) Infrastructure and the rural - urban divide in high-speed residential Internet access. Int Reg Sci Rev 30(3): 249-273