An analysis of the determinants of broadband access

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 6-7, 2007, Pages 312-326

  Flamm, Kenneth ^a   Chaudhuri, Anindya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b National Center for Educational Accountability   (United States)

Author keywords

Access; Broadband; Dialup; Digital divide; Internet; Price elasticity; Pricing; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

DIALUP; DIGITAL DIVIDE; PRICE ELASTICITY;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INTERNET; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BROADBAND NETWORKS;

EID: 34447514369     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bender R., and Grouven U. Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 10 (1998) 809-816
2. Chaudhuri, A., & Flamm, K. (2004). Price, competition, and regulating the net. In: Presented at the Association of public policy analysis and management (APPAM) annual research conference, Atlanta, GA, October 28-30.
3. Chaudhuri A., Flamm K., and Horrigan J. An analysis of the determinants of internet access. Telecommunications Policy 29 (2005) 731-755
4. Davis C.S., and Koch D.G. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. 2nd ed. (2000), BBU Press and Wiley
5. Flamm, K. (2005). The role of economics, demographics, and state policy in broadband availability. In: Presented at the PURC/London business school conference on "The Future of Broadband: Wired and Wireless, 2005", Gainesville, Florida, February 24.
6. GAO (2000). U.S. General Accounting Office Report (2001). Characteristics and choices of internet users. www.gao.gov/new.items/d01345.pdf. Accessed on 23 April 2003.
7. Gillett, S. E. (1999). Universal service: Defining the policy goal in the age of the Internet. 〈http://itel.mit.edu:/itel/docs/MISC/Gillett_Universal.html〉, accessed 4/26/03.
8. Goolsbee A. Subsidies, the value of broadband, and the importance of fixed costs. In: Robert C., and James H.A. (Eds). Broadband: Should we regulate high-speed Internet access? (2002), Brooking Institution Press, Washington, DC 278-294
9. Hausman J.A., Sidak G.J., and Singer H.J. Residential demand for broadband telecommunications and consumer access to unaffiliated Internet content providers. Yale Journal on Regulation 18 (2001) 129
10. Lall R., Walters S.J., and Morgan K. A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 11 (2002) 49-67
11. Leigh, A., & Atkinson, R. D. (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. 〈http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.leighan.students.ksg/Subpages/pdfs/Digital%20divide%20report%20PPI.pdf〉, accessed 4/26/03.
12. National Telecommunications and Information Administration reports. (1995, 1998, 1999, 2000). Falling through the net. 〈http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide〉, accessed 4/26/03.
13. National Telecommunications and Information Administration report. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. 〈http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/anationonline2.pdf〉, accessed 4/26/03.
14. Petersen B., and Harrell Jr. F.E. Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Applied Statistics 39 2 (1990) 205-217
15. Rappaport, P., Kridel, D. J., & Taylor, L. D. (2002). Residential demand for access to the Internet. Working paper. 〈http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/alleman/print_files/Forecasting_the_Demand_for_Internet_Services.PDF〉, accessed on 01/24/05.
16. The UCLA Internet report (2000). Surveying the digital future. 〈http://ccp.ucla.edu/UCLA-Internet-Report-2000.pdf〉, accessed 4/26/03.
17. Varian, H. R. (2002). The demand for bandwidth: Evidence from the INDEX Project. 〈http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/brookings.pdf〉.