A framework for interdisciplinary team communication and its implications for information systems design

8th World Congress on the Management of e-Business, WCMeB 2007 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 14-20

  Kuziemsky, Craig E ^a,d   Borycki, Elizabeth M ^a   Black, Fraser ^b   Boyle, Michael ^c   Cloutier Fisher, Denise ^a   Fox, LeAnn ^a   MacKenzie, Pat ^a   Purkis, M E ^a   Syme, Ann ^a,c   Tschanz, Coby ^b   Wainwright, Wendy ^b   Wong, Helen ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b Victoria Hospice Society   (Canada)

^c BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

COMPLEX NATURE; HEALTH-CARE SYSTEM; INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMS; PATIENT CARE; TEAM COMMUNICATION; TEAM MEETINGS; TEAM WORK; WORK ENVIRONMENTS;

DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 47649095845     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WCMEB.2007.33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Heinmann, G. D., Zeiss, A. M.. Team performance in health care: Assessment and development. 2002, United States: Kluwer.
2. Hearn, J., Higginson, I. J. Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients? A systematic literature review. Pall Med. 1998; 12: 317-332.
3. Shortell, S. M., Kaluzny, A.D. Organization theory and health services management. In S. M. Shortell and A. D. Kaluzny (Eds.) Health Care Management. 2006, New York: Thompson Delmar Learning.
4. de Haes H, Teunissen S. Communication in palliative care: a review of recent literature. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2005,17:345-350.
5. Toussiant PJ, Coiera E. Supporting Communication in Health Care. International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2005: 74, 779-781
6. Teeni D, Sagie A, Shwartz DG et al. The Process of Organizational Communication: A Model and Field Study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, VOL. 44, NO. 1, March 2001
7. Ventres W, Kooienga S, Marlin R et al. Clincian Style and Examination Room Computers: A Video Ethnography. Family Medicine. 2005;37(4):276-81
8. Kushniruk, A. W., Triola, B., Stein, E., Borycki, E. & Kannry, J. Technology induced error and usability: The relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application. Int J. Med. Inf. 2005, 74;519-526.
9. Kushniruk, A. W., Borycki, E. M., Kuwata, S. & Kannry, J. Predicting changes in workflow resulting from healthcare information systems: Ensuring the safety of healthcare. Healthcare Q. 2006; 9; 114-118.
10. Donabedian, A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl): 166-206.
11. Kuziemsky CE, Downing GM, Black FM, Lau F. A Grounded Theory Guided Approach to Palliative Care Systems Design. International Journal of Medical Informatics, In Press
12. Kuziemsky CE. A Grounded Theory-Participatory Design Approach for Capturing User Requirements for Health Information Systems Design. Proceedings of Information Technology and Communication in Healthcare. February 2007, Victoria BC.