Construct validation and psychometric evaluation of the self-efficacy scale for driver competence

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 198-206

  Sundström, Anna ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Driver competence; Perception of competence; Self efficacy; Traffic psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 47549116007     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.198     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Chemers, M.M., Hu, L., & Gracia, B.F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55-64.
5. Choi, N. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college students' academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 197-205.
6. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
7. De Craen, S., Twisk, D.A.M., Hagenzieker, M.P., Elffers, H., & Brookhuis, K.A. (2007, May). Do young novice drivers over-estimate their driving skills? Paper presented at the Young researchers seminar in SWOW, Brno, Czech Republic.
8. Deery, H. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30, 225-236.
9. Delhomme, P. (1991). Comparing one's driving with others': Assessment of abilities and frequency of offences. Evidence for a superior conformity of self-bias? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 493-508.
10. Eby, D.W., Shope, J.T., Molnar, L.J., Vivoda, J.M., & Fordyce, T.A. (2000). Improvement of older driver safety through self evaluation: The development of a self-evaluation instrument. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
11. Fan, X., & Wang, L. (1998). Effects of potential confounding factors on fit indices and parameter estimates for true and misspecified SEM models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 701-735.
12. Finney, S.J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G.R. Hancock & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling. A second course (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
13. Finney, S.J., & Schraw, G. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 161-186.
14. Freund, B., Colgrove, L.A., Burke, B.L., & McLeod, R. (2005). Self-rated driving performance among elderly drivers referred for driving evaluation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 613-618.
15. Gorsuch, R.L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560.
16. Goszcynska, M., & Roslan, A. (1989). Self-evaluation of drivers' skill: A cross-cultural comparison. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 21, 217-224.
17. Groeger, J.A. (2001). Understanding driving. Applying cognitive psychology to a complex everyday task. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc.
18. Hall, J., & West, R. (1996). Role of formal instruction and informal practice in learning to drive. Ergonomics, 39, 693-706.
19. Hatakka, M., Keskinen, E., Gregersen, N.P., Glad, A., & Hernetkoski, K. (2002). From control of the vehicle to personal self-control; Broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 5, 201-215.
20. Henson, R.K., Capraro, R.M., & Capraro, M.M. (2004). Reporting practice and use of exploratory factor analysis in educational research journals: Errors and explanation. Research in the Schools, 11(2), 61-72.
21. Henson, R.K., & Roberts, J.K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393-416.
22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
24. Jones, E. (2008). Predicting performance in first-semester college basic writers. Revisiting the role of self-beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 209-238.
25. Kane, M.T. (2006). Validation. In R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
26. Lei, M., & Lomax, R.G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 1-27.
27. Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Gore, P.A. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 307-315.
28. Marottoli, R.A., & Richardson, E.D. (1998). Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 17, 449-460.
29. McKenna, P.P., Stanier, R. A., & Lewis, C. (1991). Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and females. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 45-52.
30. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
31. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientifc inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
32. Pajares, F. (1991). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
33. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
34. Pajares, F., & Miller, D.M. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performance: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190-198.
35. Robbins, S.B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langely, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
36. Ryan, M.P. (2005). Physical activity levels in young adult Hispanics and Whites: Social cognitive theory determinants. Psychology and Health, 20, 709-727.
37. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
38. Sivak, M., Soler, J., & Tränkle, U. (1989). Cross-cultural differences in driver self-assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 371-375.
39. Soames Job, R.F. (1990). The application of learning theory to driving confidence: The effect of age and the impact of random breath testing. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 22, 97-107.
40. Stajkovic, A.D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
41. Sundström, A. (2006). Utveckling av instrument for att mäta begreppet upplevd förarkompetens [Developing an instrument for measuring the construct perceived driver competence] (BVM Report No. 22). Umeå University, Sweden.
42. Sundström, A. (2008). Self-assessment of driving skill - A review from a measurement perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 11(1), 1-9.
43. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
44. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor anal ysis. Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Vägverket. (2006). Projektdirektiv for utvecklat förarprov [Project about a new model for driver examination]. Borlänge, Sweden: Author.
46. Victoir, A., Eertmans, A., van den Bergh, O., & van den Broucke, S. (2005). Learning to drive safely: Social-cognitive responses are predictive of performance rated by novice drivers and their instructors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 8(1), 59-74.
47. Wiberg, M. (2007). Ny kursplan och nya former för examination. Jämförelse av förarprovet för körkort B före och efter förändringen [New curriculum and new forms of examination. A comparison of the Swedish driving license test before and after a change] (BVM Report No. 28). Umeå University, Sweden.
48. Wiberg, M., Stenlund, T., Sundström, A., & Henriksson, W. (2005). Underlag för urval till försöksverksamhet för kursplan B [Selection of samples to an experimental project for implementing the new curriculum for driver education]. Unpublished manuscript, Umeå University, Sweden.
49. Wood, R.E., & Atkins, P. (2000). Self-efficacy and strategy on complex tasks. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 430-446.