Cognitive diagnosis using item response models

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 216, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 74-88

  Wilson, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BEAR assessment system (BAS); Developmental assessment; Item response models; Progress variables

Indexed keywords

EID: 47549107449     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.74     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W.-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1-23.
2. Baxter, J. (1995). Children's understanding of astronomy and the earth sciences. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2003). Assessment for learning. London: Open University Press.
4. Briggs, D., Alonzo, A., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11, 33-63.
5. Claesgens, J., Scalise, K., Draney, K., Wilson, M., & Stacy, A. (2002, April). Perspectives of chemists: A framework to promote conceptual understanding of chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
6. Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 3-56). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
7. De Boeck, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Draney, K, & Wilson, M. (2007). Application of the Saltus model to stage-like data: Some applications and current developments. In M. von Davier & C.H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models (pp. 119-130). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Eylon, B., & Linn, M.C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58, 251-301.
10. Fieuws, S., Spiesens, B., & Draney, K. (2004). Mixture models. In P.D. Boeck & M. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach (pp. 213-240). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Kennedy, C.A., Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (2008). ConstructMap (computer program). BEAR Center: UC Berkeley, CA.
12. Kikas, E. (1998). The impact of teaching on students' definitions and explanations of astronomical phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 8, 439-454.
13. Klein, C.A. (1982). Children's concepts of the earth and the sun: A cross-cultural study. Science Education, 65, 95-107.
14. Linn, R., & Baker, E. (1996). Can performance-based student assessments be psychometrically sound? In J.B. Baron & D.P. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities. 95th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 84-103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 49, 359-381.
16. Masters, G.N., Adams, R.A., & Wilson, M. (1990). Charting student progress. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (Supplementary volume 2, pp. 628-634). Oxford: Pergamon.
17. Masters, G., & Forster, M. (1996). Progress maps. Assessment resource kit. Victoria, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
18. Metz, K. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research 65, 93-127.
19. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines (ETL Occasional Report 4). Edinburgh: School of Education, University of Edinburgh.
20. Meulders, M., & Xie, Y. (2004). Person-by-item predictors. In P.D. Boeck & M. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach (pp. 213-240). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. National Research Council (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Niaz, M., & Lawson, A. (1985). Balancing chemical equations: The role of developmental level and mental capacity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 41-51.
23. PISA (2005). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
24. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM Manual (Working Paper Series, Working Paper 160). Berkeley, CA: U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics.
25. Roald, L, & Mikalsen, O. (2001). Configuration and dynamics of the earth-sun-moon system: An investigation into conceptions of deaf and hearing pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 423-440.
26. Sadler, P.M. (1987). Misconceptions in astronomy. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (Vol. III, pp. 422-425). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27. Sadler, P.M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 265-296.
28. SAS Institute (1999). SAS Online Doc (Version 8) (software manual on CD-ROM). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
29. Scalise, K. (2004). BEAR CAT: Toward a theoretical basis for dynamically driven content in computer-mediated environments. Berkeley, CA: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California.
30. Schneps, M.H., & Sadler, P.M. (1988). A private universe. Santa Monica, CA: Pyramid Films.
31. Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115-163.
32. Stahly, L.L., Krockover, G.H., & Shepardson, D.P. (1999). Third grade student' ideas about the lunar phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 159-177.
33. Targan, D.S. (1987). A study of conceptual change in the content domain of the lunary phase. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (Vol. II, pp. 499-511). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34. Trumper, R. (2001). A cross-age study of science and nonscience students' conceptions of basic astronomy concepts in preservice training for high school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, 189-195.
35. Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. von Davier, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2007). Mixture-distribution and hybrid Rasch models. In M. von Davier & C.H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models (pp. 99-118). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Vosniadou, S. (1991). Conceptual development in astronomy. In S.M. Glynn, R.H. Yeany, & B.K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 149-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183.
39. Wilson, M. (1990). Measurement of developmental levels. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (Supplementary volume 2, pp. 628-634). Oxford: Pergamon.
40. Wilson, M. (1992). The ordered partition model: An extension of the partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 309-325.
41. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Wilson, M., & Adams, R. (1993). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the ordered partition model. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 69-90.
43. Wilson, M., & Carstensen, C. (2007). Assessment to improve learning in mathematics: The BEAR Assessment system. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Assessing mathematical proficiency (pp. 311-332). London: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wilson M., & Draney, K. (2004). Some links between large-scale and classroom assessments: The case of the BEAR Assessment System. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Toward coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, pp. 126-152). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Wilson, M., & Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in higher education: The BEAR Assessment System. Higher Education, 52, 635-663.
46. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 181-208.
47. Wu, M., Adams, R., & Wilson, M. (1998) ACER ConQuest: Generalized item response modeling software. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.