The influence of attitudes toward women on the relative individuation of women and men in the Netherlands

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 240-245

  Stewart, Tracie L ^a,c   Van Knippenberg, Ad ^b   Joly, Janneke ^b   Lippmann, Maarten W ^b   Hermsen, Berlinda J ^b   Harris, Kevin R ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4744371444     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00141.x     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotypes. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
2. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 31-75). Chichester, England: Wiley.
3. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217.
4. Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. (2000). Van vrouwenstrijd naar vanzelfsprekendheid; Meerjarennota emancipatiebeleid. Retrieved Augusts, 2002, from the SZW web site: http://home.szw.nl.
5. Neve, R. J. M. (1995). Changes in attitudes toward women's emancipation in the Netherlands over two decades: Unraveling a trend. Social Science Research, 24, 167-187.
6. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.
7. nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
8. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure the attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66-67.
9. Stewart, T. L., Berkvens, M., Engels, W. A. E. W., & Pass, J. A. (2003). Status and likability: Can the "mindful" woman have it all? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2040-2059.
10. Stewart, T. L., Harris, K. R., van Knippenberg, A., Hermsen, B. J., Joly, J., & Lippmann, M. W. (2003). The effect of attitude toward women on the relative individuation of women and men is mediated by perceived gender subgroups. Manuscript under review.
11. Stewart, T. L., Vassar, P. M., Sanchez, D. T., & David, S. E. (2000). Attitude toward women's societal roles moderates the effect of gender cues on target individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 143-157.
12. Takiff, H. A., Sanchez, D. T., & Stewart, T. L. (2001). What's in a name? The status implications of students' terms of address for male and female professors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 134-144.
13. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S.T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
14. Van Oenen, G. (2000, September 18). Take it easy: Howunderen-forcing law can benefit the rule of law. NRC Handelsblad.
15. Vrugt, A. J., & Nauta, M. C. (1995). Subtle prejudice against women in the Netherlands. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 601-606.
16. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study (Rev. ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Young, H., van Knippenberg, A., Ellemers, N., & DeVries, A. (1997). The effects of group membership and social context on information organization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 523-537.