The effects of group membership and social context on information organization

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 523-537

  Young, Heather ^b   Van Knippenberg, Ad ^c   Ellemers, Naomi ^a   De Vries, Nanne ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031507698     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199709/10)27:5<523::AID-EJSP830>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bower, G. H., & Gilligan, S. G. (1979). Remembering information related to one's self. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 420-432.
2. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. Advanced Social Cognition, 1, 1-36.
3. Doise, W., Deschamps, J. C., & Meyers, G. (1978). The accentuation of intra-category similarities. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 159-168) London: Academic Press.
4. Doosje, B., Spears, R., Haslam, S. A., Koomen, W., & Oakes, P. J. (1995). The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgments and the evaluation of group characteristics. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Ellemers, N., & van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Stereotyping in social context. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, and S. A. Haslam (Eds), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123-140.
7. Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
8. Hamilton, D. L., Driscoll, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Cognitive organization of impressions: Effects of incongruency in complex representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 925-939.
9. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 139-160.
10. Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
11. Judd, C. M., Ryan, C. S., & Park, B. (1991). Accuracy in the judgment of in-group and out-group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 366-379.
12. Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 26-38.
13. Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5-11.
14. Lemmers, L., & van Knippenberg, A. (1994). De evaluatie van ingroup-en outgroupleden als functie van groepscontext [The evaluation of in-group and out-group members as a function of group context]. Unpublished manuscript.
15. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
16. Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
17. Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Ostrom, T. M., Carpenter, S. L., Sedikides, C., & Li, F. (1993). Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 21-34.
19. Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
20. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.
21. Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 211-245.
22. Park, B., Ryan, C. S., & Judd, C. M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553-567.
23. Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45-48.
24. Sedikides, C., Devine, P. G., & Fuhrman, R. W. (1991). Social perception in multitarget settings: Effects of motivated encoding strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 625-632.
25. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77-121.
26. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
27. van Knippenberg, A., van Twuyver, M., & Pepels, J. (1994). Factors affecting social categorization processes in memory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 419-431.
28. Vonk, R., & van Knippenberg, A. (1995) Processing attitudes from ingroup and outgroup members: Effects of within-group and within-person inconsistencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 215-227.
29. Wilder, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202-1213.
30. Worth, L. T. (1988). The role of prior expectations and selective information processing in outgroup homogeneity. University of California, Santa Barbara, PhD thesis.
31. Young, H., van Knippenberg, A., Ellemers, N., & de Vries, N. (1994). [Information organization as function of presentation format]. Unpublished raw data.