Beyond information searching and browsing: Acquiring knowledge from digital libraries

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 97-120

  Feng, Ling ^a   Jeusfeld, Manfred A ^b   Hoppenbrouwers, Jeroen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Document subspace; Knowledge subspace; Strategic support; Tactical support

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

DOCUMENT SUBSPACE; KNOWLEDGE SUBSPACE; STRATEGIC SUPPORT; TACTICAL SUPPORT;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 4744368841     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. Washington, DC, USA (pp. 207-216).
2. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on very large data bases, Santiago, Chile (pp. 478-499).
3. Anderson R. Information and knowledge based systems: An introduction. 1992;Prentice Hall, Inc, New York.
4. Bagga, A. (1998). Analyzing the complexity of a domain with respect to an information extraction task. In Proceedings of the seven message understanding conference, Virginia, USA. Available: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894.02/ related.projects/muc/proceed-ings/muc_7_toc.html#infoextract/.
5. Bates M. Subject access in online catalogs: a design model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(6):1986;357-376.
6. Bates M. The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface. Information Processing and Management. 38(3):2002;381-400.
7. Beard K., Sharma V. Multidimensional ranking for data in digital spatial libraries. Journal on Digital Libraries. 1(2):1997;153-160.
8. Beaulieu M., Jones S. Interactive searching and interface issues in the Okapi best match probabilistic retrieval system. Interacting with Computers. 10:1998;237-248.
9. Belkin, N., Borgman, C., Dumais, S., & Beaulieu M. H. (1994). Evaluating interactive retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on research and development in information retrieval, Dublin, Ireland (p. 361).
10. Belkin, N., & Marchetti, P. (1990). Determining the functionality and features of an intelligent interface to an information retrieval system. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on research and development in information retrieval, Brussels, Belgium (pp. 151-177).
11. Bennett, N., He, Q., Chang, C., & Schatz, B. (1999). Concept extraction in the interspace prototype. Technical Report, UIUCDCS-R-99-2095, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
12. Borgman, C. (1987). Individual differences in the use of information retrieval systems: some issues and some data. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on research and development in information retrieval, New Orleans, USA (pp. 61-71).
13. Brachman, R., Ciccarelli, E., Greenfeld, N., & Yonke, M. (1978). KL-ONE reference manual. Technical report, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. BBN Report No. 3848, Cambridge, MA.
14. Buttenfield, B., & Larsen, S. (1997). Building a digital library for earth system science: the Alexandria project. In Proceedings of annual meeting of the Geoscience Information Society, USA (pp. 23-26).
15. Cercone N., McCalla G. The Knowledge Frontier. 1987;Springer-Verlag, New York. (S. C. Shapiro, & W. J. Rapaport, Chapter: SNePS considered as a fully intensional propositional semantic network).
16. Checkland P., Holwell S. Information, systems and information systems - making sense of the field. 1998;John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
17. Chellas B. Modal logic: An introduction. 1980;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Chen H. Knowledge-based document retrieval: framework and design. Journal of Information Science. 18:1992;293-314.
19. Chen H. Semantic research for digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine. 5(10):1999;. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/chen/10chen.html.
20. Chen H., Lynch K., Basu K., Ng T. Generating, integrating, and activating thesauri for concept-based document retrieval. IEEE Expert. 8(2):1993;25-34.
21. Chen, H., Smith, T., & Ng, T. (1997). Geoscience self-organizing map and concept space. In Proceedings of 2nd ACM international conference on digital libraries, Philadelphia, USA (p. 257).
22. Cooper, B., Crespo, A., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2000). Implementing a reliable digital object archive. In Proceedings of the fourth European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 128-143).
23. Crespo, A., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2000). Modeling archival repositories for digital libraries. In Proceedings of the fourth European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 190-205).
24. Crestani F., Lalmas M., van Rijsgergen C., Campbell I. 'Is this document relevant?⋯ probably': a survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval. ACM Computing Surveys. 30(4):1998;528-552.
25. Dao, T. (1998). An indexing model for structured documents to support queries on content, structure and attributes. In Proceedings of the IEEE forum on research and technology advances in digital libraries, California, USA (pp. 88-97).
26. Dumais, S. (1999). Beyond content-based retrieval: modeling domains, users, and interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE advanced in digital libraries, Maryland, USA (pp. 144-145).
27. Dunlop M., van Rijsbergen C. Hypermedia and free text retrieval. Information Processing and Management. 29(3):1993;287-298.
28. Efthimiadis, E. (1993). A user-centered evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on research and development in information retrieval, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 146-159).
29. Evens M., Smith R. A lexicon for a computer question-answering system. American Journal of Computational Linguistics. 83:1979;1-93.
30. Fidel R. User-centered indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(8):1994;572-576.
31. Findler N. Associative networks: The representation and use of knowledge by computers. 1979;Academic Press, New York. (S. C. Shapiro, Chapter: The SnePS semantic network processing system).
32. Fox E., Marchionini G. Toward a world wide digital library. Communications of the ACM. 41(4):1998;28-32.
33. Fox E., Marchionini G. Digital libraries: introduction. Communications of the ACM. 44(5):2001;30-32.
34. Frakes W., Baeza-Yates R. Information retrieval: Data structures and algorithms. 1992;Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
35. Furnas G., Landauer T., Gomex L.M., Dumais S. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM. 30(11):1987;964-971.
36. Garnham A. Artificial intelligence: An introduction. 1988;Routledge & Kegan Paul, Inc, London.
37. Garson, J. (2001). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter 2001 ed. Edward n. zalta. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ (Chapter: Modal logic).
38. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition. 5(2):1993;199-220.
39. Guarino, N., & Welty, C. (2000). Ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on conceptual modeling, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (pp. 210-224).
40. Hoppenbrouwers, J. (1997). Conceptual modeling and the lexicon. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
41. Hoppenbrouwers, J., & Paijmans, H. (2000). Invading the fortress: how to besiege reinforced information bunkers. In Proceedings of the IEEE advanced in digital libraries, Washington, DC USA (pp. 27-35).
42. House, N. V. (1995). User needs assessment and evaluation for the UC Berkeley electronic environmental library project. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on the theory and practice of digital libraries, Texas, USA. Available: http://csdl.tamu.edu/DL95/.
43. House N.V., Butler M., Ogle V., Schiff L. User-centered iterative design for digital libraries: the Cypress experience. D-Lib Magazine. 2(2):1996;. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february96/02vanhouse.html.
44. Ingwersen, P. (1994). Polyrepresentation of information needs and semantic entities: elements of a cognitive theory for information retrieval interaction. In Proceedings of the 17th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Dublin, Ireland (pp. 101-110).
45. Jones S., Gatford M., Robertson S., Beaulieu M.-H., Seeker J., Walker S. Interactive thesaurus navigation: intelligence rules OK. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1):1995;52-59.
46. Jr R.D., Lagoze C. Extending the Warwick framework: From metadata containers to active digital objects. D-Lib Magazine. 3(11):1997;. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november97/daniel/lldaniel.html.
47. Kahn, R., &Wilensky, R. (1995). A framework for distributed digital object services. Corporation for National Research Initiatives. Available: http://www.cnri.reston.va.us/home/cstr/arch/k-w.html.
48. Kantor, P. (1998). Observation and measurement in evaluating digital libraries. Available: http://www.canis.uiuc.edu/seminar.html.
49. Kiefer, F. (Ed.). (1969). Studies in syntax and semantics. Dordrecht, Holland (Y. D. Apresyan, L. A. Melcuk, & A. K. Zolkovsky, Chapter: Semantics and lexicography: towards a new type of unilingual dictionary).
50. Lancaster, F., & Sandore, B. (1997). Technology and management in library and information services. University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
51. Lancaster, F., & Smith, L. (Eds.), (1990). Artificial intelligence and expert systems: will they change the library? The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (pp. 2-49). (D. P. Metzler, Chapter: Artificial intelligence: what will they think of next?).
52. Lenat D. CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of ACM. 13(11):1995;32-38.
53. Lin, D. (1998). Using collocation statistics in information extraction. In Proceedings of the seven message understanding conference, Virginia, USA. Available: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894.02/related_projects/muc/proceed- ings/muc_7_toc.html#infoextract.
54. Marchionini G. Evaluating digital libraries: a longitudinal and multi-faceted view. Library Trend. 49(2):2000;304-333.
55. Markowitz J., Nutter J., Evens M. Beyond is-a and part-whole: more semantic network links. Journal of Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 23(6-9):1992;377-390.
56. Marshall, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Lally, A., Shen, R., Fox, E., & Cassel, L. (2003). Convergence of knowledge management and E-learning: the GetSmart experience. In Proceedings of the third joint ACM/IEEE-CS international conference on digital libraries, Houston (pp. 135-146).
57. McKnight C., Dillon A., Richardson J. Problems in hyperland? A human factors perspective. Hypermedia. 1(2):1989;167-178.
58. Mead J., Gay G. Concept mapping: an innovative approach to digital library design and evaluation. ACM SIGOIS Bulletin. 16(2):1995;ID-14.
59. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., & Paepcke, A. (2000). A mediation infrastructure for digital library services. Technical report, Stanford University.
60. Miller, G., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. (1993). Introduction to wordnet: an on-line lexical database. Available: http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/wn/5papers.pdf.
61. Minsky M. Semantic information processing. 1968;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (R. Quillian, Chapter: Semantic memory).
62. Minsky M. Semantic information processing. 1968;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (B. Raphael, Chapter: A computer program for semantic information retrieval).
63. Nutter, J. (1989). Representing knowledge about words. In Proceedings of the second national conference of AI and cognitive science, London (pp. 313-328).
64. Nutter J., Fox E., Evens M. Building a lexicon from machine-readable dictionaries for improved information retrieval. Journal of Literary and Linguistic Computing. 5(2):1990;129-137.
65. Paepcke A., Brandriff R., Janee G., Larson R., Ludaescher B., Melnik S., Raghavan S. Search middleware and the simple digital library interoperability protocol. D-Lib Magazine. 6(3):2000;5-8. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ march00/paepcke/03paepcke.html.
66. Paepcke A., Chang C., Garcia-Molina H., Winograd T. Interoperability for digital libraries worldwide. Communications of the ACM. 41(4):1998;33-43.
67. Paepcke A., Cousins S., Garcia-Molina H., Hassan S., Ketchpel S., Roscheisen M., Winograd T. Using distributed objects for digital library interoperability. IEEE Computer. 29(5):1996;61-68.
68. Paepcke, A., & Hassan, S. (1996). Combining CORBA and the World-Wide Web in the Stanford digital library project. In Proceedings of the OMG's WWW/CORBA workshop.
69. Papazoglou M., Hoppenbrouwers J. Contextualizing the information space in federated digital libraries. SIGMOD Record. 28(1):1999;40-46.
70. Payette S., Blanchi C., Lagoze C., Overly E. Interoperability for digital objects and repositories: the Cornell/CNRI experiments. D-Lib Magazine. 5(5):1999;. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may99/payette/05payette.html.
71. Payette, S., & Lagoze, C. (1999). Flexible and extensible digital object and repository architecture (FEDORA). In Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries, Crete, Greece (pp. 41-59).
72. Phelps, T., & Wilensky, R. (1997). Multivalent annotations. In Proceedings of the 1st European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries, Pisa, Italy (pp. 287-303).
73. Rich E. Artificial Intelligence. 1983;McGraw-Hill, Inc, Singapore.
74. Schatz, B. (1996). Information analysis in the net: the interspace of the twenty-first century. In Proceedings of the 7th workshop on digital libraries. Tsukuba Science City, Japan. Available: http://www.canis.uiuc.edu/archive/talks/ plenary.pdf.
75. Schatz, B. (1998). High-performance distributed digital libraries: building the interspace on the grid. In Proceedings of 7th IEEE international symposium on high-performance distributed computing (pp. 224-234).
76. Schatz B., Chen H. Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer. 32(2):1999;45-50.
77. Schatz B., Mischo W., Cole T., Bishop A., Harum S., Johnson E., Neumann L., Chen H., Ng D. Federated search of scientific literature. IEEE Computer. 32(2):1999;51-59.
78. Sowa J. Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine. 1984;Addison-Wesley, Longman, Inc, Boston.
79. Spink A., Saracevic T. Human-computer interaction in information retrieval: nature and manifestations of feedback. Interacting with Computers. 10(3):1998;249-267.
80. Sundheim, B. (1993). Tipster/MUC-5 information extraction system evaluation. In Proceedings of the fifth message understanding conference, San Mateo, USA (pp. 27-44).
81. Vélez, B., Weiss, R., Sheldon, M., & Gifford, D. (1997). Fast and effective query refinement. In Proceedings of the 20th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Philadelphia, USA (pp. 6-15).
82. Waterworth J., Chignell M. A model for information exploration. Hypermedia. 3(1):1991;35-58.
83. Willett P. Recent trends in hierarchical document clustering: a critical review. Information Processing and Management. 24(5):1988;577-597.
84. Wolff, J., Flörke, H., & Cremers, A. (2000). Searching and browsing collections of structural information. In Proceedings of the IEEE advances in digital libraries, Washington, DC, USA (pp. 141-150).