Morphological metrics

Journal of New Music Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 289-368

  Polansky, Larry ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4744347022     PISSN: 09298215     EISSN: 17445027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09298219608570710     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Abraham, R., 1986. Mathematics and evolution: A manifesto. International Synergy Journal, 1(3): 14–28.
2. Adams, C., 1976. Melodic contour typology. Ethnomusicology, 20(2): 179–215.
3. Ames, C., 1992. A catalog of sequence generators. Leonardo Music Journal, 1(2): 55–72.
4. Ames, C., 1991. A catalog of statistical distributions: Techniques for transforming random, determinate and chaotic sequences. Leonardo Music Journal, 1(1): 55–70.
5. Apel, T., 1993. A metric for determining the distance between MQ frames, Paper written for Systems of Musical Thought, Graduate Seminar, Dartmouth College.
6. Ash, R., 1970. Basic Probability Theory, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7. Attneave, F., 1950. Dimensions of similarity. American Journal of Psychology, 63: 516–556.
8. Barlow, C., 1987. Two essays on theory. Computer Music Journal, 11(1): 44–60.
9. Barlow, C., 1980. Bus journey to Parametron (all about Çogluotobüsisletmesi), Feedback Papers 21–23 Köln: Feedback-Studio-Verlag.
10. Becker, J. 1980. Traditional Music in Modern Java, Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
11. Belet, B., 1987. An interview with James Tenney. Perspectives of New Music, 25(1,2): 459–466.
12. Berkley, S., 1993. corrMorph: Extending Morphological Metrics with Convolution Operators, Paper written for Systems of Musical Thought, Graduate Seminar, Dartmouth College.
13. Bryant, V., 1985. Metric Spaces: Iteration and Application, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Chaitin, G., 1979. “ Towards a mathematical definition of life ”. In The Maximum Entropy Formulation, Edited by: Levine, R. D., and Tribus, M., Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Chalmers, J., 1993. Divisions of the Tetrachord, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
16. Copson, E.T., 1968. Metric Spaces, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Crawford, R., 1931. Piano Study in Mixed Accents, Bryn Mawr: Theodore Presser Company.
18. Cuddy, L., and Cohen, A.J., 1976. Recognition of transposed melodic sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28: 255–270.
19. Cuddy, L., Cohen, A.J., and Miller, J., 1979. Melody recognition: The experimental application of musical rules. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33: 148–157.
20. Deliege, I., 1987. Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoffs grouping preference rules. Music Perception, 4(4) Summer: 325–36.
21. Dowling, W.J., 1982. “ Melodic information processing and its development ”. In The Psychology of Music, Edited by: Deutsch, D., New York: Academic Press.
22. Dowling, W.J., 1978. Scale and contour: Two components of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85(4): 341–354.
23. Dowling, W.J., 1972. Recognition of inversions of melodies and melodic contours. Perception and Psychophysics, 9: 348–349.
24. Dowling, W.J., 1971. Recognition of melodic transformations: Inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion. Perception and Psychophysics, 12: 417–421.
25. Dowling, W.J., and Fujitani, D.S., 1971. Contour, interval and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49: 524–531.
26. Dowling, W.J., and Hollombe, A.W., 1977. The perception of melodies distorted by splitting into several octaves: Effects of increasing proximity and melodic contour. Perception and Psychophysics, 21: 60–64.
27. Dugundgi, J., 1966. Topology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Edworthy, J., 1985. Interval and contour in melody processing. Music Perception, 2(3): 375–388.
29. Edworthy, J., 1983. “ Melodic contour and musical structure ”. In Musical Structure and Cognition, Edited by: Dowling, W. J., and Harwood, D., New York: Academic Press.
30. Erbe, T., and Polansky, L., 1994. Soundhack User Manual, Manual section on Spectral Mutation written by L. Polansky. Available via FTP from: http://music.calarts.edu/∼tre
31. Forte, A., 1973. The Structure of Atonal Music, New Haven: Yale University Press.
32. Forte, A., 1965. The domain and relations of set-complex theory. Journal of Music Theory, 9(1): 173–180.
33. Friedmann, M., 1987. A response: My contour, their contour. Journal of Music Theory, Fall: 268–274.
34. Friedmann, M., 1985. A methodology for the discussion of contour: Its application to Schoenberg's music. Journal of Music Theory, 29: 223–248.
35. Grey, J.M., 1975. An exploration of musical timbre, CCRMA Report No. STAN-M-2
36. Grimaldi, R.P., 1989. Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics, New York: Addison Wesley Publishing.
37. Hermann, R., 1994. A General Measurement for Similarity Relations: A Heuristic for Constructing or Evaluating Aspects of Possible Musical Grammars, Eastman School of Music. Ph.D Dissertation
38. Isaacson, E., 1990. Similarity of interval-class content between pitch-class sets. Journal of Music Theory, 34(1): 1–28.
39. Kaplansky, I., 1972. Set Theory and Metric Spaces, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Kolinski, M., 1965a. The general direction of melodic movement. Ethnomusicology, 9: 240–264.
41. Kolinski, M., 1965b. “ The structure of melodic movement- A new method of analysis (revised version) ”. In Studies in Ethnomusicology, Vol. 2, 96–120. New York: Oak Publications.
42. Knuth, D., 1973. The Art of Computer Programming. Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms, Reading: Addison Wesley.
43. Krumhansl, C., 1978. Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85(5): 445–463.
44. Langmead, C., 1995. A Theoretical Model of Timbre Perception Based on Morphological Representations of Time-Varying Spectra, Electro-Acoustic Music. Dartmouth College. M.A. Thesis
45. Langmead, C., 1995a. PAST (software), available from http://music.dartmouth.edu/∼langmead
46. Lederman, W., and Vajda, S., eds. 1982. Handbook of Applicable Mathematics. Volume IV: Analysis, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
47. Lerdahl, F., and Jackendoff, R., 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, Cambridge: MIT Press.
48. Lewin, D., 1979–0. A response to a response: On PC set relatedness. Perspectives of New Music, 13(2): 498–502.
49. Lewin, D., 1977. Forte's interval vector, my interval function, and Regener's common-note function. Journal of Music Theory, 21(2) Fall: 194–237.
50. Lord, C.H., 1981. Intervallic similarity relations in atonal music. Journal of Music Theory, 25(1) Spring: 91–111.
51. Marvin, E., 1991. The perception of rhythm in non-tonal music: Rhythmic contours in the music of Edgard Varèse. Music Theory Spectrum, 13(1): 61–78.
52. Marvin, E., A generalization of contour theory to diverse musical spaces: Analytical applications to the music of Dallapiccola and Stockhausen. Paper presented at the Society for Music Theory. Oakland, California.
53. Marvin, E., and Laprade, P., 1987. Relating music contours: Extensions of a theory for contour. Journal of Music Theory, 31(2): 225–267.
54. Monahan, C., and Carterette, E., 1985. Pitch and duration as determinants of musical space. Music Perception, 3(1) Fall: 1–32.
55. Morris, R., New directions in the theory and analysis of musical contours. Paper presented at the Society for Music Theory Meeting. Kansas City.
56. Morris, R., 1991. Class Notes for Atonal Music Theory, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
57. Morris, R., 1989. Composition with Pitch Classes: A Theory of Compositional Design, New Haven: Yale University Press.
58. Morris, R., 1979–80. A similarity index for pitch-class sets. Perspectives of New Music, 18(2): 445–660.
59. Nelson, M., 1986. In pursuit of Charles Seeger's heterophonic ideal: Three palindromic works by Ruth Crawford. Musical Quarterly, 72(4): 458–475.
60. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Whitmore, G.A., 1978. Applied Statistics, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
61. Pennycook, B., and Stammen, D., Real-time recognition of melodic fragments using the dynamic timewarp algorithm. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 1993. Tokyo. pp. 232–235. International Computer Music Association.
62. Polansky, L., 1994a. The Casten Variation Score. For solo piano, or ensemble, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
63. Polansky, L., 1994b. Live interactive computer music in HMSL: 1984–1992. Computer Music Journal, 18(2): 59–77.
64. Polansky, L., Envisioning Ruth Crawford Seeger's Piano Study in Mixed Accents. Response presented at Society for Music Theory Montreal. Extended version of paper given at West Coast Society for Music Theory. 1994, Oakland, California.
65. Polansky, L., 1993b. Roads to Chimacum Score. For string or mandolin quartet, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
66. Polansky, L., More on morphological mutation functions: Recent techniques and developments. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 1992. pp. 57–60.
67. San Jose: International Computer Music Association and Polansky, L., 1992b. Two Childrens’ Songs. Score. For two bass winds, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
68. Polansky, L., 1991. 51 Melodies Score. For two electric guitars and rock band, Lebanon: Frog, Peak Music.
69. Polansky, L., 1988. 17 Simple Melodies of the Same Length for solo performer and computer. Software. Frog Peak Music, Available on cassette, Works for Performers and Live.
70. Interactive Computer, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
71. Polansky, L., Morphological metrics: An introduction to a theory of formal distances. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 1987. San Francisco. pp. 197–205. International Computer Music Association.
72. Polansky, L., 1987a. Distance Musics I-VI, For Any Number of Programmer/Performers and Live, Programmable Computer Music Systems. Perspectives of New Music, 25(1,2): 537–544.
73. Polansky, L., Burk, P., and Rosenboom, D., 1990. HMSL (Hierarchical Music Specification Language): A theoretical overview. Perspectives of New Music, 28(2): 136–178.
74. Polansky, L., Burk, P., and Rosenboom, D., HMSL: Overview (Version 3.1) and Notes on Intelligent Instrument Design. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 1987. Urbana. pp. 220–227. International Computer Music Association.
75. Polansky, L., and Bassein, R., 1992. Possible and impossible melody: Some formal aspects of contour. Journal of Music Theory, 36(2): 284
76. (Paper delivered at the Society for Music Theory. Oakland, California).
77. Polansky, L., and Erbe, T., 1996. “ Spectral mutation in Soundhack ”.
78. Polansky, L., and McKinney, M., Morphological mutation functions: Applications to motivic transformation and a new class of cross-synthesis techniques. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 1991. Montreal. pp. 234–241. International Computer Music Association.
79. Rabiner, L.R., Rosenberg, A.E., and Levinson, S.E., 1978. “ Considerations in dynamic time warping algorithms for discrete word recognition ”. In IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-25 575–582.
80. Rahn, J., 1979–80. Relating sets. Perspectives of New Music, 13(2): 483–498.
81. Rahn, J., 1975. On pitch or rhythm: Interpretations of orderings of and in pitch and time. Perspectives of New Music, 13(2): 182–203.
82. Regener, E., 1974. On Allen Forte's theory of chords. Perspectives of New Music, 13(1): 191–212.
83. Roeder, J., 1987. A geometric representation of pitch-class series. Perspectives of New Music, 25(1,2): 362–409.
84. Schoenberg, A., 1975. Style and Idea, London: Faber and Faber.
85. Scholz, C., 1994. Lattice Piece on the CD Hallways: 11 Musicians and HMSL, Lebanon: Frog Peak Music.
86. Seeger, C., 1960. On the moods of a music logic. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 13: 224–261.
87. Shepard, R.N., 1987. Towards a universal law of generalization for psychological space. Science, September 11: 1317–1323.
88. Shepard, R.N., 1974. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 39: 373–421.
89. Shepard, R.N., 1964. Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1: 54–87.
90. Shepard, R.N., 1963. Analysis of proximities as a technique for the study of information processing in man. Human Factors, 1: 54–87.
91. Shepard, R.N., 1962a. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part I. Psychometrika, 27: 125–140.
92. Shepard, R.N., 1962b. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part II. Psychometrika, 27: 219–246.
93. Shreider, Y.A., 1974. What is Distance?, Edited by: Cohn, L., and Edelberg, H., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94. Sim, B., 1976. Fundamentals of Topology, New York: MacMillan Publishing.
95. Teitelbaum, R., 1965. Intervallic relations in atonal music. Journal of Music Theory, 24(2) Fall: 72–127.
96. Tenney, J., 1987. About “changes”: 64 studies for 6 harps. Perspectives of New Music, 25(1,2): 64–87.
97. Tenney, J., 1984. Bridge (for two pianos, eight hands) Score, Baltimore: Smith Publications.
98. Tenney, J., 1961. Meta + Hodos, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana. Published by Frog Peak Music. M.A. Thesis
99. Tenney, J., and Polansky, L., 1980. Temporal gestalt perception in music: A metric space model. Journal of Music Theory, 24: 205–241.
100. Torgerson, W.S., 1965. Multidimensional scaling of similarity. Psychometrika, 30: 379–393.
101. Tufte, E., 1990. Envisioning Information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
102. Tversky, A., 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84: 327–352.
103. Uno, Y., Examining the roles of musical dimensions in Messiaen's Mode de valeurs et d'intensitiés: contour, entropy and hierarchical segmentation. Paper presented at the Society for Music Theory. Cincinatti.
104. Vaughan, K., 1992. Experimental ethnomusicology: A perceptual basis for Jairazbhoy's circle of that. The World of Music, 34(3): 99–119.
105. Wessel, D., 1979. Timbre space and musical structure. Computer Music Journal, 3(2): 45–52.
106. White, B., 1960. The recognition of distorted melodies. American Journal of Psychology, 73: 100–107.
107. Wonnacott, T., and Wonnacott, R., 1972. Introductory Statistics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
108. Wyatt, W., and Bridges, C., 1974. Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.