Citation and quotation accuracy in three anatomy journals

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 534-539

  Lukić, Ivan Krešimir ^a   Lukić, Anita ^a   Glunčić, Vicko ^b   Katavić, Vedran ^a   Vučenik, Vladimira ^a   Marušić, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliography; Documentation; Literature; Periodicals; Publishing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANATOMY; DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REVIEW;

ANATOMY; AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOGRAPHY; DOCUMENTATION; HUMANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; MEDLINE; PERIODICALS;

EID: 4744337664     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.10255     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Asano M, Mikawa K, Nishiria K, Maekawa N, Obara H. 1995a. The accuracy of references in Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 50:1080-1082.
2. Asano M, Mikawa K, Nishina K, Maekawa N, Obara H. 1995b. Improvement of the accuracy of references in the Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 42:370-372.
3. Ball P. 2002. Paper trail reveals references go unread by citing authors. Nature 420:594.
4. de Lacey G, Record C, Wade J. 1985. How accurate are quotation and references in medical journals? Br Med J 291:884-886.
5. Dyer GSM, Thorndike MEL. 2000. Quinde mortui vivos docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad Med 75:969-979.
6. Evans JT, Nadjari HI, Burchell SA. 1990. Quotation and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem. JAMA 263:1353-1354.
7. Fenton JE, Brazier H, De Souze A, Huges JP, McShane DP. 2000. The accuracy of citation and quotation in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery journals. Clin Otolaryngol 25:40-44.
8. Gavras H. 2002. Inappropriate attribution: The "lazy author syndrome." Am J Hypertens 15:831.
9. Goldberg R, Newton E, Cameron J, Jacobson R, Chan L, Bukata WR, Rakab A. 1993. Reference accuracy in the emergency medicine literature. Ann Emerg Med 22:1450-1454.
10. Guide for authors [editorial]. 2001. Clin Anat 14:396-400.
11. Hanna SJ, Freeston JE. 2002. Importance of anatomy and dissection: the junior doctor's viewpoint. Clin Anat 15:377-378.
12. Holt S, Siebers R, Suder A, Loan R, Jeffery O. 2000. The accuracy of references in Australian and New Zealand medical journals. NZ Med J 113:416-417.
13. Institute for Scientific Information. 2001. Journal Citation Report, Science Edition [CD rom]. Philadelphia (PA): Institute.
14. Instructions to authors [editorial]. 2001. Ann Anat 183:97.
15. Instructions to authors [editorial]. 2001. Surg Radiol Anat 23:97.
16. Lee SY, Lee JS. 1999. A survey of reference accuracy in two Asian dermatologie journals (the Journal of Dermatology and the Korean Journal of Dermatology). Int J Dermatol 38:357-360.
17. Lok CKW, Chan MTV, Martinson IM. 2001. Risk factors for citation errors in peer-reviewed nursing journals. J Adv Nurs 34:223-229.
18. Lukić IK, Glunčić V, Ivkić G, Hubenstorf M, Marušić A. 2003. Virtual dissection: a lesson from the 18th century. Lancet 361 (in press).
19. Marušić A, Marušić M. 1999. Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. Croat Med J 40:508-514.
20. Murdoch J, Barnes JA. 1998. Statistical tables. 4th Ed. London: Macmillan Press LTD. p 54-59.
21. Ngan Kee WD, Roach VJ, Lau TK. 1997. The accuracy of references in the Hong Kong Medical Journal. Hong Kong Med J 3:377-380.
22. O'Connor AE. 2002. A review of the accuracy of references in the Journal of Emergency Medicine. Emerg Med 14:139-141.
23. Paalman MH. 2000. Why teach anatomy? Anatomists respond. Anat Rec (New Anat) 261:1-2.
24. Peat J, Elliot E, Baur L, Keena V. 2002. Scientific writing. Easy when you know how. London: BMJ Books. p 101.
25. Roach VJ, Lau TK, Ngan Kee WD. 1997. The quality of citations in major international obstetrics and gynecology journals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:973-975.
26. Schulmeister L. 1998. Quotation and reference accuracy of three nursing journals. J Nurs Scholarsh 30:143-146.
27. Sharp D. 2002. Kipling's guide to writing a scientific paper. Croat Med J 43:262-267.
28. Siebers R. 2000. The accuracy of references of three allergy journals. J Allergy Clin Immunol 105:837-838.
29. Siebers R, Holt S. 2000. Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals. Lancet 356:1445.
30. Simkin MV, Roychowdhury VP. 2002. Read before you cite! Condensed matter cond-mat/0212043 [cited 2003 Jun 12] http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043 [last accessed 23 April 2004].
31. Sutherland AG, Craig N, Maffulli N, Brooksbank A, Moir JS. 2000. Accuracy of references in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82-B:9-10.
32. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2003. MEDLINE citations prior to 1966. FAQ Frequently asked questions [cited 2003 Jun 13] http://wvvw.nlm.nih.gov/ services/oldmed.html [last accessed 23 April 2004].
33. Vargas-Origel A, Gómez-Martínez G, Vargas-Nieto MA. 2001. The accuracy of references in pediatric journals. Arch Dis Child 85:497-498.
34. Wager E, Middleton P. 2002. Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: A systematic review. JAMA 287:2821-2824.
35. Wager E, Middleton P, Peer Review and Technical Editing Systematic Review (PIRATES) Group. 2001. Reference accuracy in peer-reviewed journals: a systematic review. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, September 14-16, 2001, Barcelona, Spain. Chicago (IL); American Medical Association. p 48.