Raising to object in Norwegian and the derived object constraint

Studia Linguistica

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 155-181

  Lødrup, Helge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47349102949     PISSN: 00393193     EISSN: 14679582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.00147.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aissen, J. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 673 711.
2. Aissen, J. 2003. Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21 : 3, 435 483.
3. Andréasson, M. 2007. Satsadverbial, ledföljd och informationsdynamik i svenskan. PhD. diss. Department of Swedish, Göteborg University, Sweden.
4. Barron, J. 1999. Perception, volition and reduced clausal complementation. PhD. diss. Department of Linguistics, University of Manchester, England.
5. Basilico, D. 2003. The topic of small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 1 35.
6. Bennis, H. Hoekstra, T. 1989. Why Kaatje was not heard sing a song. Sentential complementation and the lexicon: Studies in honour of Wim de Geest, ed. D. Jaspers, W. Klooster, Y. Putseys P. Seuren, 21 40. Dordrecht : Foris.
7. Beukema, F. den Dikken, M. 1989. The position of the infinitival marker in the Germanic languages. Sentential complementation and the lexicon: Studies in honour of Wim de Geest, ed. D. Jaspers, W. Klooster, Y. Putseys P. Seuren, 55 75. Dordrecht : Foris.
8. Boković,. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
9. Brandt, S. 1995. Infinitive control in Danish. Copenhagen : Munksgaard.
10. Bresnan, J. 1982. Control and complementation. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. J. Bresnan, 282 390. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
11. Bresnan, J. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language 70, 72 131.
12. Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell Publishers.
13. Bresnan, J. Mchombo, S. A. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63, 741 782.
14. Bresnan, J. Nikitina, T. 2003. On the gradience of the dative alternation. roa.rutgers.eduview.php3?roa=596
15. Carlson, G. N. 1980. Reference to kinds in English. New York : Garland.
16. Christensen, K. R. 2005. Interfaces: Negation - Syntax - Brain. PhD. diss., Department of English, University of Aarhus, Denmark. http://www.hum.au.dk/engelsk/engkrc/.
17. Davies, W. D. Dubinsky, S. 2004. The grammar of raising and control: A course in syntactic argumentation. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
18. Eide, K. M. farli, T. A. 2001. Semi-lexical heads in a semantically charged syntax. Semi-lexical categories, ed. N. Corver H. van Riemsdijk, 455 473. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Engh, J. 1994. Verb i passiv fulgt av perfektum partisipp: Bruk og historie. Oslo : Novus.
20. Faarlund, J. T., Lie, S. Vannebo, K. I. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk. Oslo : Universitetsforlaget.
21. Falk, H. Torp, A. 1900. Dansk-norskens syntax i historisk fremstilling. Kristiania : Aschehoug.
22. Fernald, T.B. 2000. Predicates and temporal arguments. New York : Oxford University Press.
23. Givón, T. 1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction. Volume II. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
24. Hansen, A. 1967. Moderne dansk. Volume III. København : Grafisk Forlag.
25. Hellan, L. 1988. Anaphora in Norwegian and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht : Foris.
26. Holmberg, A. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studia Linguistica 53, 1 39.
27. Kayne, R. S. 1981. On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349 371.
28. Kayne, R. S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht : Foris
29. King, T. H. Zaenen, A. 2004. F-structures, information structure, and discourse structure. Proceedings of the LFG04 Conference, ed. M. Butt T. H. King. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/9/lfg04.html.
30. Kiparsky, P. Kiparsky, C. 1970. Fact. Progress in Linguistics, ed. M. Bierwisch K.E. Heidolph, 143 73. The Hague : Mouton.
31. Ladusaw, W. A. 1994. Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. Proccedings of SALT IV, ed. M. Harvey L. Santelmann, 220 229. Ithaca, Cornell University. semanticsarchive.netArchive2ExNzlkZladusaw.salt4.pdf
32. Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
33. Lundin, K. 2003. Small clauses in Swedish: Towards a unified account. Lund : Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.
34. Lødrup, H. 2002. Infinitival complements in Norwegian and the form - function relation. Proceedings of the LFG02 Conference, ed. M. Butt T. H. King. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/7/lfg02.html.
35. Lødrup, H. 2004. Clausal complementation in Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 27, 61 95.
36. Lødrup, H. 2007. The diversity and unity of the accusative with infinitive construction: A Norwegian perspective. Forthcoming in Linguistics.
37. Manning, C. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. Probabilistic Linguistics, ed. In R. Bod, J. Hay S. Jannedy, 289 341. Cambridge MA : MIT Press.
38. Mikkelsen, K. 1911. Dansk ordføjningslære. København : Lehmann & Stage.
39. Miller, D. G. 2002. Nonfinite structures in theory and change. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
40. Milsark, G. L. 1979. Existential sentences in English. New York : Garland
41. Newmeyer, F. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
42. Oslo Corpus of Tagged Norwegian Texts. http://www.tekstlab.uio.no/norsk/ bokmaal/english.html.
43. Øvrelid, L. 2003. Subject or object? Syntactic disambiguation in Norwegian, stochastic optimality theory and application in an automatic system. MA thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo.
44. Payne, J. 1999. The English accusative-and-infinitive onstruction: A categorial analysis. The clause in English: In honour of Rodney Huddleston, ed. P. Collins D. Lee, 187 227. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
45. Pesetsky, D. 1991. Zero Syntax. Vol. 2: Infinitives. http://web.mit.edu/ linguistics/www/bibliography/pesetsky.html.
46. Platzack, C. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik - det minimalistiska programmet: En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Lund : Studentlitteratur.
47. Postal, P. M. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
48. Postal, P. M. 1993. Some defective paradigms, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 347 364.
49. Quirk, R., et al. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London : Longman.
50. Raposo, E. Uriagereka, J. 1995. Two types of small clauses (Toward a syntax of themerheme relations). Small clauses (Syntax and Semantics 28), ed. A. Cardinaletti M.T. Guasti (eds 179 206. New York : Academic Press.
51. Richards, N. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
52. Rizzi, L. 1981. Nominative marking in Italian infinitives and the nominative island constraint. Binding and filtering, 129 157, ed. F. Heny. London : Croom Helm.
53. Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
54. Rooryck, J. 1997. On the interaction between raising and focus in sentential complementation. Studia Linguistica 51, 1 49.
55. Runner, J. T. 2006. Lingering challenges to the raising-to-object and object-control constructions. Syntax 9, 193 213.
56. Ruwet, N. 1991. Raising and control revisited. Syntax and human experience, ed. J. Goldsmith, 56 81. University of Chicago Press.
57. Sells, P. 2001. Structure, alignment and optimality in Swedish. Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.
58. Teleman, U., Hellberg, S. Andersson, E. 1999a. Svenska akademiens grammatik. Volume 3 : Fraser. Stockholm : Svenska Akademien.
59. Teleman, U., Hellberg, S. Andersson, E. 1999b. Svenska akademiens grammatik. Volume 4 : Satser och meningar. Stockholm : Svenska Akademien.
60. Ureland, P. S. 1973. Verb complementation in Swedish and other Germanic languages: Studies in comparative syntax. Stockholm : Skriptor
61. Vallduví, E. Engdahl, E. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34, 459 520.
62. Wierzbicka, A. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.