The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation

The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-376

  Davies, William D ^a   Dubinsky, Stanley ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889412292     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470755693     Document Type: Book

References (247)

1. Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. MIT dissertation.
2. Aissen, Judith L. 1979. Possessor ascension in Tzotzil. In Laura Martin, ed., Papers in Mayan linguistics, 89-108. Columbia, MO: Lucas Brothers.
3. Aissen, Judith L. 1990. Towards a theory of agreement controllers. In Paul M. Postal and Brian D. Joseph, eds, Studies in relational grammar 3, 279-320. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Akatsuka-McCawley, Noriko. 1972. On the treatment of Japanese passives. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 8. 259-70.
5. Akmajian, Adrian, and Frank Heny. 1976. An introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Allen, Barbara J., Donald G. Frantz, Donna B. Gardiner, and David M. Perlmutter. 1990. Verb agreement, possessor ascension, and multistratal representation in Southern Tiwa. In Paul M. Postal and Brian D. Joseph, eds, Studies in relational grammar3, 312-83. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Andrews, Avery. 1982. The representation of case in Modern Icelandic. In Joan Bresnan, ed., The mental representation of grammatical relations, 427-503. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Aoun, Joseph. 1979. On government, Case-marking, and clitic-placement. Unpublished MS, MIT.
9. Bach, Emmon. 1977. Review article on Postal, On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Language 53. 621-54.
10. Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Bayer, Samuel. 1996. The coordination of unlike categories. Language 72. 579-616.
12. Bell, Sarah J. 1976. Cebuano subjects in two frameworks. MIT dissertation.
13. Bell, Sarah J. 1983. Advancements and ascensions in Cebuano. In David M. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in relational grammar 1, 143-218. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The Case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 1-34.
15. Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 291-352.
16. Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Dianne Jonas. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 195-236.
17. Boeckx, Cedric. 1999. Conflicting c-command requirements. Studia Linguistica 53. 227-50.
18. Boeckx, Cedric. 2002. Patterns of subject raising across experiencers. Unpublished MS, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
19. Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2003. Reply to "Control is not movement." Unpublished MS, University of Connecticut and University of Maryland.
20. Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 591-656.
21. Brame, Michael. 1976. Conjectures and refutations in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Bresnan, Joan. 1970. On complementizers: Towards a syntactic theory of complement types. Foundations of Language 6. 297-321.
23. Bresnan, Joan. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47. 257-81.
24. Bresnan, Joan. 1972. Theory of complementation in English syntax. MIT dissertation.
25. Bresnan, Joan. 1976. Nonarguments for raising. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 3-40.
26. Bresnan, Joan. 1978. A realistic transformational grammar. In Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan, and George A. Miller, eds, Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 1-60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 3-40.
28. Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language 70. 72-131.
29. Brody, Michael. 1999. Relating syntactic elements: Remarks on Norbert Hornstein's "Movement and chains." Syntax 2.210-26.
30. Bruening, Benjamin. 2001a. Raising to object and proper Movement. Unpublished MS, University of Delaware.
31. Bruening, Benjamin. 2001b. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. MIT dissertation.
32. Bruening, Benjamin. 2002. Raising to Object and Improper Movement. Paper presented at the 21st meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 21). University of California, Santa Cruz.
33. Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries. MIT dissertation.
34. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
35. Chametzky, Robert. 1987. Coordination and the organization of a grammar. University of Chicago dissertation.
36. Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, eds, Readings in transformational grammar, 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
39. Chomsky, Noam. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits, eds, Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in linguistics and psychology, 183-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, eds, A festschrift for Morris Halle, 232-86. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
41. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, eds, Formal syntax, 71-132. New York: Academic Press.
42. Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 1-46.
43. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Reprinted 1993, Dordrecht: Mouton de Gruyter.
44. Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
47. Chomsky, Noam. 1989 [1991]. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Itziar Laka and Anoop Mahajan, eds, Functional heads and clause structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 43-74. MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Reprinted 1991 in Robert Freidin, ed., Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 417-54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted with minor revisions in Chomsky 1995 (pp. 129-66).
48. Chomsky, Noam. 1992 [1993]. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Reprinted 1993 in Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, eds, The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted with minor revisions in Chomsky 1995 (pp. 167-217).
49. Chomsky, Noam. 1994 [1995]. Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Reprinted 1995 in Gert Webelhuth, ed., Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, 383-439. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
50. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Includes Chomsky 1989 [1991], Chomsky 1992 [1993], and Chomsky and Lasnik 1993 [1995].)
51. Chomsky, Noam. 1998 [2000]. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Reprinted 2000 in Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, eds, Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Chomsky, Noam. 1999 [2001]. Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics. Reprinted 2001 in Michael Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 425-504.
54. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993 [1995]. The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, eds, Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 506-69. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Reprinted with minor revisions in Chomsky 1995 (pp. 13-127).
55. Chung, Sandra. 1976. On the subject of two passives in Indonesian. In Charles Li, ed., Subject and topic, 57-98. New York: Academic Press.
56. Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon. 1981. Subjecthood and islandhood: Evidence from Quechua. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 1-30.
57. Courtenay, Karen. 1998. Summary: Subject control verb promise in English. http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/9/9-651.html
58. Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 493-512.
59. Culicover, Peter, and Wendy Wilkins. 1986. Control, PRO, and the projection principle. Language 62. 120-53.
60. Davies, William D. 1981. Possessor ascension in Choctaw. NELS 11. 38-57.
61. Davies, William D. 1986. Choctaw verb agreement and universal grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
62. Davies, William D. 1988. The case against functional control. Lingua 76. 1-20.
63. Davies, William D. 1990. Javanese evidence for Subject-to-Object Raising. In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell, and Errapel Mejias-Bikandi, eds, Grammatical relations: A cross-theoretical perspective, 95-108. Stanford: CSLI.
64. Davies, William D. 2001. Against raising in Madurese (and other Javanic languages). Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 36. 57-69.
65. Davies, William D., and Stanley Dubinsky. 1999. Sentential subjects as complex NPs: New reasons for an old account of subjacency. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 34. 83-94.
66. Davies, William D., and Stanley Dubinsky. 2001a. Functional structure and a parameterization of subject properties. In William Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds, Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 247-79. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
67. Davies, William D., and Stanley Dubinsky, eds. 2001b. Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
68. Davies, William D., and Stanley Dubinsky. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 1-37.
69. Dowty, David. 1982. Grammatical relations and Montague Grammar. In Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey K. Pullum, eds, On the nature of syntactic representation, 79-130. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
70. Dowty, David. 1985. On recent analyses of the semantics of control. Linguistics and Philosophy 8. 291-331.
71. Dubinsky, Stanley. 1985. Japanese union constructions: A unified analyis of -rare and -sase. Cornell University dissertation.
72. Dubinsky, Stanley. 1992. Case assignment to VP-adjoined positions: Nominative objects in Japanese. Linguistics 30. 873-910.
73. Dubinsky, Stanley. 1997. Predicate union and the syntax of Japanese passives. Journal of Linguistics 33. 1-37.
74. Dubinsky, Stanley. 1999. Easy clauses to mistake as relatives: The syntax of English postnominal infinitives. Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 1998 10. 108-19.
75. Dubinsky, Stanley, and Carol Rosen. 1987. A bibliography on Relational Grammar through May 1987 with selected titles on Lexical-Functional Grammar (1st edn 1983.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
76. Emonds, Joseph. 1970. Root and structure preserving transformations. MIT dissertation.
77. Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.
78. Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verbal complex V′-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9. 49-77.
79. Emonds, Joseph. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
80. Featherston, Samuel, Matthias Gross, Thomas F. Münte, and Harald Clahsen. 2000. Brain potentials in the processing of complex sentences: An ERP study of control and raising constructions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29. 141-54.
81. Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach and Robert Harms, eds, Universals in linguistic theory, 1-87. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
82. Fodor, Jerry. 1975. The language of thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
83. Franco, Jon. 1993. On object agreement in Spanish. University of Southern California dissertation.
84. Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Gibson, Jeanne. 1980. Clause union in Chamorro and in universal grammar. UCSD dissertation. Published 1992, New York: Garland Press.
86. Gordon, Lynn. 1980. Raising in Bauan Fijian. Unpublished MS, UCLA.
87. Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 279-326.
88. Gruber, Jeffrey. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. MIT dissertation. Reprinted 1976 in Gruber, Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
89. Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, and Lisa Travies. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 547-93.
90. Harada, Naomi. 2002. Licensing PF-visible formal features: A linear algorithm and Case-related phenomena in PF. University of California-Irvine dissertation.
91. Harada, Naomi. 2003. Raising to object is NOT an edge phenomenon. Paper presented at the January 2003 Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, and unpublished MS, ATR International.
92. Harada, S. I. 1973. Counter equi NP deletion. Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 7.113-47. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
93. Harris, Randy Allen. 1995. The linguistic wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Hermon, Gabriella. 1984. Syntactic modularity. Dordrecht: Foris. Published version of 1981 University of Illinois dissertation "Non-nominative subject constructions in the Government and Binding framework."
95. Higginbotham, James. 1992. Reference and control. In Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, eds, Control and grammar, 79-108. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
96. Higgins, Roger. 1981. Proleptic objects and verbs of perception in Zacapoaxtla Nahuat. Texas Linguistic Forum 18. 69-88.
97. Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. Proceedings of the HUMIT 2000. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40, 67-80.
98. Hornstein, Norbert. 1997. Control in GB and Minimalism. Glot International 8.2.3-6.
99. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 69-96.
100. Hornstein, Norbert. 2000. On A-chains: A reply to Brody. Syntax 3. 129-43.
101. Huck, Geoffrey J., and John A. Goldsmith. 1995. Ideology and linguistic theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debates. London: Routledge.
102. Jackendoff, Ray. 1969. Some rules of semantic interpretation for English. MIT dissertation. Revised and published as Jackendoff 1972.
103. Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104. Jackendoff, Ray. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 89-150.
105. Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
106. Jackendoff, Ray. 1995. The architecture of the language faculty: A neominimalist perspective. MS, Brandeis University. Published 1998 in Peter Culicover and Louise McNally, eds, The limits of syntax, 19-45. San Diego: Academic Press.
107. Jackendoff, Ray, and Peter Culicover. 2003. The semantic basis of Control in English. Language 79. 517-56.
108. Jacobson, Pauline. 1992. Raising without movement. In Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, eds, Control and grammar, 149-94. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
109. Jake, Janice. 1985. Grammatical relations in Imbabura Quechua. New York: Garland Publishing. Published version of 1983 University of Illinois dissertation.
110. Jake, Janice, and David Odden. 1979. Raising in Kipsigis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9. 131-55.
111. Johnson, David, and Shalom Lappin. 1996. A critique of the Minimalist Program. MS, IBM Watson Research Center and University of London. Published 1997 in Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 273-333.
112. Johnson, David, and Paul M. Postal. 1980. Arc Pair Grammar. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
113. Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9. 577-636.
114. Joseph, Brian D. 1976. Raising in Modern Greek: A copying process? In Judith Aissen and Jorge Hankamer, eds, Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics II.241-78.
115. Kaplan, Ron, and Joan Bresnan. 1982. Lexical Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Joan Bresnan, ed., The mental representation of grammatical relations, 173-281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116. Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
117. Kay, Martin. 1983. Unification Grammar. Technical report. Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
118. Kayne, Richard. 1981. On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 349-71.
119. Kayne, Richard. 1989. Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Paola Benincà, ed., Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, 85-103. Dordrecht: Foris.
120. Keenan, Edward, and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63-99.
121. Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. UC Publications in Linguistics 91. Berkeley: University of California Press.
122. Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1986. Subjects in Japanese and English. University of Massachusetts dissertation.
123. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1993. Object agreement phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis. In Jonathan Bobaljik and Colin Phillips, eds, Papers on case and agreement I, 99-148. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 18.
124. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1995. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. MIT dissertation.
125. Koster, Jan, and Robert May. 1982. On the constituency of infinitives. Language 58. 116-43.
126. Kotzoglu, George. 2002. Greek "ECM" and how to control it. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 39-56.
127. Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. The event argument and the semantics of Voice. Unpublished MS, University of Massachusetts.
128. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, eds, Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-38. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
129. Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford: CSLI.
130. Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Subject Raising in Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1.1.
131. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
132. Kuno, Susumu. 1976. Subject Raising. In Masayoshi Shibatani, ed., Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar, 17-49. New York, Academic Press. Revised version of 1972. Subject Raising in Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1.1.
133. Kuroda, S. Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Lingvisticae Investigationes 12.1-47. Also in William Poser, ed., Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, 103-43. Stanford: CSLI.
134. Kuroda, S. Y. 1992. Movement of noun phrases in Japanese. In S. Y. Kuroda, Japanese syntax and semantics, 253-92. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acedemic.
135. Lakoff, George. 1967. Deep and surface grammar. Unpublished MS, Harvard University.
136. Lakoff, George. 1970. Global rules. Language 46. 627-39.
137. Lakoff, George. 1971. On Generative Semantics. In Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits, eds, Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in linguistics and psychology, 232-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
139. Landau, Idan. 2002. (Un)interpretable Neg in Comp. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 465-92.
140. Landau, Idan. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 471-98.
141. Landau, Idan. To appear. The scale of finiteness and control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
142. Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335-91.
143. Lasnik, Howard. 1993. Lectures on Minimalist Syntax. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics. Occasional Papers 1. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Department of Linguistics.
144. Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 615-33.
145. Lasnik, Howard. 1999a. Chains of arguments. In Samuel Epstein and Norbert Hornstein, eds, Working Minimalism, 189-215. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
146. Lasnik, Howard. 1999b. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
147. Lasnik, Howard. 2001. Subjects, objects, and the EPP. In William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds, Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 103-21. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
148. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1991. On the subject of infinitives. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 27. 324-43.
149. Lawler, John. 1972. A problem in participatory democracy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
150. Lebeaux, David. 1985. Locality and anaphoric binding. Linguistic Review 4. 343-63.
151. Lees, Robert B. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.
152. Lefebvre, Claire, and Pieter Muysken. 1982. Raising as move Case. Linguistic Review 2. 161-210.
153. Lightfoot, David. 1976. The theoretical implications of subject raising. Foundations of Language 14. 257-86.
154. Manzini, Maria Rita. 1983. On Control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 421-46.
155. Manzini, Maria Rita, and Anna Roussou. 2000. A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua 110. 409-47.
156. Marantz, Alec. 1983. Raising and category types in Japanese. In Yukio Otsu, Henk van Riemsdijk, Kazoku Inoue, Akio Kamio, and Noriko Kawasaki, eds, Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition, 29-47. Tokyo: Department of Linguistics, International Christian University.
157. Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
158. Marantz, Alec. 1995. The Minimalist Program. In Gert Webelhuth, ed., Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, 349-82. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
159. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) 4.2, 201-25. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics.
160. Martin, Roger. 2001. Null Case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 141-66.
161. Massam, Diane. 1985. Case theory and the projection principle. MIT dissertation.
162. Massam, Diane. 2001. On predication and the status of subjects in Niuean. In William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds, Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 225-46. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
163. McCawley, James. 1970. English as a VSO language. Language 46. 286-99.
164. McCawley, James. 1982. 30 million theories of grammar. London: Croom Helm.
165. McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85. 259-302.
166. McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and subject positions. In Liliane Haegeman, ed., Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 197-235. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
167. McCloskey, James. 2001. The distribution of subject properties in Irish. In William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds, Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 157-92. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
168. Moore, John. 1998. Turkish copy-raising and A-chain locality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 148-89.
169. Moravcsik, Edith, and Jessica Wirth. 1980. Current approaches to syntax. Syntax and Semantics 13. New York: Academic Press.
170. Neidle, Carol. 1982. Case agreement in Russian. In Joan Bresnan, ed., The mental representation of grammatical relations, 391-426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
171. Newmeyer, Frederick. 1969. English aspectual verbs. University of Illinois dissertation. Published as Newmeyer 1975.
172. Newmeyer, Frederick. 1975. English aspectual verbs. The Hague: Mouton.
173. Newmeyer, Frederick. 1986. Linguistic theory in America. New York: Academic Press. 2nd edn.
174. Newmeyer, Frederick. 2001. Grammatical functions, thematic roles, and phrase structure: Their underlying disunity. In William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds, Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 53-75. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
175. Nuñes, Jairo. 1995. The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program. University of Maryland dissertation.
176. Perlmutter, David M. 1968. Deep and surface constraints in syntax. MIT dissertation.
177. Perlmutter, David M. 1970. The two verbs "begin." In Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, eds, Readings in transformational grammar, 107-19. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
178. Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal. 1977. Toward a universal characterization of passivization. BLS 3.394-417. Revised version 1983 in David M. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in Relational Grammar 1, 3-29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
179. Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal. 1983a. Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In David M. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in relational grammar 1, 81-128. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
180. Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal. 1983b [1972]. The Relational Succession Law. In David M. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in relational grammar 1, 30-80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
181. Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal. 1984a. Impersonal passives and some relational laws. In David M. Perlmutter and Carol Rosen, eds, Studies in relational grammar 2, 126-70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
182. Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal. 1984b. The 1-advancement Exclusiveness Law. In David M. Perlmutter and Carol Rosen, eds, Studies in relational grammar 2, 81-125. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
183. Pesetsky, David. 1997. Optimality Theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. In Diana Archangeli and D. Terence Langendoen, eds, Optimality Theory: An overview, 134-70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
184. Polinsky, Maria, and Eric Potsdam. 2002. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 245-82.
185. Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1987. Information based syntax. CSLI Lecture Notes 13. Stanford: CSLI.
186. Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
187. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365-424.
188. Poser, William. 1983. What is the double-o constraint a constraint on? Paper presented at the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Los Angeles.
189. Postal, Paul M. 1966. A note on "understood transitively." International Journal of American Linguistics 32.90-3.
190. Postal, Paul M. 1969. Review of McIntosh and Halliday, Patterns of language. Foundations of Language 5. 409-26.
191. Postal, Paul M. 1970. On coreferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 439-500.
192. Postal, Paul M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
193. Postal, Paul M. 1972. The best theory. In Stanley Peters, ed., Goals of linguistic theory, 131-70. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
194. Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
195. Postal, Paul M. 1977. About a "nonargument" for raising. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 141-54.
196. Postal, Paul M., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 635-70.
197. Potsdam, Eric, and Jeffrey Runner. 2001. Richard returns: Copy Raising and its implications. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS)37.453-68.
198. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
199. Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1991. Citation etiquette beyond Thunderdome. In Pullum, The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax and other irreverent essays on the study of language, 147-58. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
200. Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1996. Nostalgic views from Building 2. Review article on The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser. Journal of Linguistics 32. 137-47.
201. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2001. Root-selecting, verb-selecting and VoiceP-selecting causatives. Paper presented at the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 32nd Annual Meeting, CUNY Graduate Center and New York University, New York City, NY.
202. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Verbal domains: Causative formation at the root, category and phase levels. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Hyatt Regency San Francisco Hotel, San Francisco, CA.
203. Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational syntax: A student's guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.
204. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On chain formation. In Hagit Borer, ed., The syntax of pronominal clitics. Syntax and Semantics 17, 65-96. New York: Academic Press.
205. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
206. Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. Residual verb second and the Wh-Criterion. Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics 2, University of Geneva. Reprinted in Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi, eds, Parameters and functional heads, 63-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
207. Rogers, Andy. 1971. Three kinds of physical perception verbs. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 7. 206-22.
208. Rogers, Andy. 1972. Another look at flip perception verbs. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 8. 303-15.
209. Rogers, Andy. 1974. A Transderivational Constraint on Richard? Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 10.551-8.
210. Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of sentential complementation. London: Routledge.
211. Rosen, Carol. 1981. The relational structure of reflexive clauses: Evidence from Italian. Harvard dissertation. Published 1988 in the Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series, Jorge Hankamer, ed. New York: Garland Publishing.
212. Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
213. Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1970. A principle governing deletion in English sentential complementations. In Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, eds, Readings in transformational grammar, 20-9. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
214. Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT dissertation.
215. Rouveret, Alain, and Jean Roger Vergnaud. 1980. Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 97-202.
216. Runner, Jeffrey. 1995. Noun phrase licensing and interpretation. University of Massachusetts dissertation.
217. Ruwet, Nicolas. 1991. Syntax and the human experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Translation (by John Goldsmith) and republication of 1982 MS.
218. Sag, Ivan, Gerald Gazdar, Thomas Wasow, and Steven Weisler. 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 117-72.
219. Saito, Mamoru. 1983. Comments on the papers on generative syntax. In Yukio Otsu, Henk van Riemsdijk, Kazoku Inoue, Akio Kamio, and Noriko Kawasaki, eds, Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition, 79-89. Tokyo: Department of Linguistics, International Christian University.
220. Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. MIT dissertation.
221. Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and topic, 491-518. New York: Academic Press.
222. Seiter, William J. 1983. Subject-Direct Object Raising in Niuean. In David M. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in relational grammar 1, 317-59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
223. Sells, Peter. 1990. Is there Subject-to-Object Raising in Japanese? In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell, and Errapel Mejías-Bikandi, eds, Grammatical relations: A crosstheoretical perspective, 445-57. Stanford: CSLI.
224. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1978. Mikami Akira and the notion of "subject" in Japanese grammar. In John Hinds and Irwin Howard, eds, Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, 52-67. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
225. Shibatani, Masayoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
226. Shieber, Stuart. 1986. An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. Stanford: CSLI.
227. Shieber, Stuart, Hans Uszkoreit, Fernando Pereira, Jane Robinson, and Mabry Tyson. 1983. The formalism and implementation of PATR-II. In Barbara J. Grosz and Mark Stickel, eds, Research on interactive acquisition and use of knowledge, technical report 4, 39-79. Final report for SRI Project 1894. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
228. SigurDsson, Halldór Ármann. 1991. Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9. 327-63.
229. Son, Min-Jeong. 2003. A unified syntactic account of morphological causatives in Korean. Paper presented at the 13th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference, Michigan State University, August 1-3.
230. Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 425-49.
231. Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, eds, Phrase structure and the lexicon, 213-76. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
232. Stowell, Tim. 1982. The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 561-70.
233. Takano, Yuji. 2002. Nominative object in Japanese complex predicate constructions: A prolepsis analysis. Unpublished MS, Kinjo Gakuin University. Pub. 2003 as "Nominative objects in Japanese complex predicate constructions: A prolepsis analysis." Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21.779-834.
234. Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2002. Raising to object out of CP. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 637-52.
235. Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. MIT dissertation.
236. Travis, Lisa deMena. 2001. Derived objects in Malagasy. In William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds, Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 123-55. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
237. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1993. On feature-checking for wh-traces. Object agreement phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis. In Jonathan Bobaljik and Colin Phillips, eds, Papers on case and agreement I, 243-80. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 18.
238. Uszkoreit, Hans. 1986. Categorial Unification Grammar. Proceedings of COLING-86, 187-94.
239. van Riemsdijk, Henk, and Edwin Williams. 1986. Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
240. Wechsler, Stephen, and I Wayan Arka. 1998. Syntactic ergativity in Balinese: An argument structure based theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 387-441.
241. Wells, Rulon. 1947. Immediate constituents. Language 23. 81-117.
242. Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203-38.
243. Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. Linguistic Review 1. 81-114.
244. Wyngaerd, Guido Vanden. 1994. PRO-legomena: Distribution and reference of infinitival subjects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
245. Zagona, Karen. 1982. Government and proper government of verbal projections. University of Washington dissertation. Revised and published as Zagona 1988.
246. Zagona, Karen. 1988. Verb phrase syntax: A parametric study of English and Spanish. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
247. Zidani-Eroǧlu, Leyla. 1997. Exceptionally case-marked NPs as matrix objects. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 219-30.