Uncemented stems in hip replacement - Hydroxyapatite or plain porous: Does it matter? Based on a prospective study of HA Omnifit stems at 15-years minimum follow-up

HIP International

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 69-74

  Epinette, Jean Alain ^a   Manley, M T ^b  

^a Orthopaedic Research and Imaging Center in Arthroplasty   (France)

^b STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; HA; Hip arthroplasty; Hydroxyapatite; Osteolysis; Plain porous; Stem fixation

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC CEMENT; BONE CEMENT; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE;

BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BONE REMODELING; BONE TURNOVER; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMUR SHAFT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERIAL COATING; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POROSITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 47349096872     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2008.2077     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Epinette JA. HA, the Third Track. In: Hydroxyapatite coated hip and knee arthroplasty. Cahiers d'enseignement de la SOFCOT. Paris: Expansion Scientifique Française Ed. 1995; no. 51, p. VII (English Volume).
2. Geesink RGT. Osteoconductive coatings for total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 395: 53-65.
3. Bauer TW, Geesink RGT, Zimmerman R, McMahon JT. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of components retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 1439-52.
4. Tonino AJ, Therin M, Doyle C. HA-coated femoral stems. Histology and histomorphometry around five components retrieved at post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 148-54.
5. Hardy DCR, Frayssinet P, Guilhem A, LaFontaine MA, DeLince PE. Bonding of hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses. Histopathology of specimens from four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 732-40.
6. Geesink RG, de Groot K, Klein CP. Chemical implant fixation using hydroxyl-apatite coatings. The development of a human total hip prosthesis for chemical fixation to bone using hydroxyl-apatite coatings on titanium substrates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (225): 147-70.
7. Geesink RGT, Manley MT, eds. Hydroxylapatite coatings in orthopaedic surgery. New York: Raven Press 1993; 1-24.
8. Epinette J-A, Geesink RGT, eds. Hydroxyapatite coated hip and knee arthroplasty. Vol. 51. Cahiers d'Enseignement de la SOFCOT. Paris: Expansion Scientifique Française Ed. 1995 (English Volume).
9. Epinette J-A, Manley MT. Fifteen years of clinical experience with hydroxyapatite coatings in joint arthroplasty. Paris: Springer-Verlag 2004.
10. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51: 737-55.
11. Merle d'Aubigne R, Postel R. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36: 452-75.
12. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (257): 107-28.
13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81.
14. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Jaffe WL, Geesink RG, Manley MT, Feinberg JR. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components: 15-year minimum follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 75-80.
15. Grübl A, Chiari C, Giurea A, et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with the rectangular titanium Zweymuller stem. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2210-5.
16. Bloebaum RD, Merrell M, Gustke K, Simmons M. Retrieval analysis of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 267: 97-102.
17. Bloebaum RD, Zou L, Bachus KN, Shea KG, Hofmann AA, Dunn HK. Analysis of particles in acetabular components from patients with osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (338): 109-18.
18. Rokkum M, Brandt M, Bye K, Hetland KR, Waage S, Reigstad A. Polyethylene wear, osteolysis and acetabular loosening with an HA-coated hip prosthesis. A follow-up of 94 consecutive arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 582-9.
19. Morscher EW, Hefti A, Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 267-72.
20. Tonino A, Oosterbos C, Rahmy A, Therin M, Doyle C. Hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular components. Histological and histomorphometric analysis of six cups retrieved at autopsy between three and seven years after successful implantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 817-25.
21. Hardy DC, Frayssinet P, Bonel G, Authom T, Le Naelou SA, Delince PE. Two-year outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses. Two femoral prostheses retrieved at autopsy. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 253-7.
22. Bauer TW. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating (Correspondence). J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 745.
23. Bauer TW, Taylor SK, Jiang M, Medendorp SV. An indirect comparison of third-body wear in retrieved hydroxyapatitecoated, porous, and cemented femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (298): 11-8.
24. Grübl A, Chiari C, Gruber M, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 425-31.
25. Engh CA, Hopper RH Jr. The odyssey of porous-coated fixation. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (4 Suppl 1): 102-7.
26. Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Sr. Distal ingrowth components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420): 135-41.
27. Engh CA Jr, Young AM, Engh CA Sr, Hopper RH Jr. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (417): 157-63.
28. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen HB, Bünger C. Fixation of porous coated versus HA coated implants. In: Hydroxyapatite coated hip and knee arthroplasty. Cahiers d'enseignement de la SOFCOT. Paris: Expansion Scientifique Française Ed. 1995; no. 51, p. 71-84 (English Volume).
29. Coathup MJ, Blunn GW, Flynn N, Williams C, Thomas NP. A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatitecoated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 118-23.
30. Hamadouche M, Witvoet J, Porcher R, Meunier A, Sedel L, Nizard R. Hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted femoral stems. A prospective, randomised study using EBRA-FCA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 979-87.
31. Donnelly W J, Kobayashi A, Freeman MA, et al. Radiological and survival comparison of four methods of fixation of a proximal femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79: 351-60.
32. Kärrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, et al. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses: review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 344: 94-110.
33. Søballe K, Toksvig-Larsen S, Gelineck J, et al. Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 681-7.