Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: A resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 502-512

  Strnad, Jakub ^a   Urban, Karel ^b   Povysil, Ctibor ^c   Strnad, Zclenek ^a  

^a Laboratory for Glass and Ceramics   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HRADEC KRALOVE   (Czech Republic)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Alkali etched surface; Bioactive surface; Dental implants; Histometric analysis; Resonance frequency analysis; Secondary stability

Indexed keywords

ALKALI; HYDROXIDE; HYDROXIDE ION; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DOG; IMPLANT; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VIBRATION; WETTABILITY;

ALKALIES; ANIMALS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DOGS; HYDROXIDES; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; VIBRATION; WETTABILITY;

EID: 47249166047     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
2. Soballe K, Hansen ES, B-Rasmussen H, Jorgensen PH, Bünger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions.J Orthop Res 1992;10:285-299.
3. Pilliar RM. Quantitative evaluation of the effect of movement at a porous coated implant-bone interface. In: Davis EJ (ed). The Bone-Biomaterial Interface.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995:380-387.
4. Brunski JE. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.Clin Materials 1992;3:153-201.
5. Raghavendra S, Wood MC,Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: Review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:425-431.
6. Hench LL. Surface reaction kinetics and adsorption of biological moieties: A mechanistic approach to tissue attachment. In: Davies JE (ed).The Bone-Biomaterial Interface.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995:33-48.
7. Cochran DL, Buser D. Bone response to sandblasted and acidattacked titanium: Experimental and clinical studies In: Davies JE. Bone Engineering.Toronto:Em Squared, 2000:391-398.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22.
9. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J.Torque and histomorphometrlc evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-micron-sized particles of Al2O3.J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:251-260.
10. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Anderson B, Krol JJ.Ahistomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topografie.Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
11. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S.A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses.Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:11-19.
12. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
13. Sul YT, Johansson C,Wennerberg A,Cho LR,Chang BS, Albrektsson T.Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: Surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness,and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:349-359.
14. Ducheyne P, Qiu Q. Bioactive ceramics:The effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. Biomaterials 1999;20:2287-3303.
15. Sul YT, Johansson C, AlbrektssonT.Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium,TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:319-329.
16. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A,Scarano A. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:668-674.
17. Marinho VC, Cellettl R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C, Piattelli A. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: A histologic study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:75-81.
18. Lazzara RJ. Bone response to dual acid-etched and machined titanium implant surfaces. In: Davies JE. Bone Engineering. Toronto: Em squared, 2000:381 -388.
19. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:350-357.
20. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Binder E,Lang NP,Jan Lineje J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-392.
21. Buser D,Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH,Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
22. Hench LL, Wilson J (eds.). An Introduction to Bioceramics. Singapore:World Scientific, 1999:1-23,41-62.
23. Anderson OH, Larisin KH. Models for physical properties and bioactivity of phosphate opal glasses. Glastech Ber 1988;61: 141-145.
24. Strnad Z. Role of the glass phase in bioactive glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 1992;13:317-321.
25. Koga N, Strnad J, Strnad Z, Sesták J.Thermodynamics of nonbridging oxygen in silica bio-compatible glass-ceramics: Mimetic material for the bone tissue substitution. J Therm Anal Calorim 2003,71:927-937.
26. Sul YT.The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003;24:3893-3907.
27. Kokubo T, Ito S.Shigematsu M, Sakka S,YamamuroT. Fatigue and life-time of bioactive glass-ceramics A-W containing apatite and wollastonite. J Mater Sci 1987;22;4067-4070.
28. Hench LL. Bioceramics: From concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487-1570.
29. Sun L, Berndt CC, Gross KA, Kucuk A. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: A review.J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:570-592.
30. Clemens JAM, Klein CPAT, Vriesde RC, Rozing PM, deGroot K. Healing of large (2 mm) gaps around calcium phosphatecoated bone implants: A study in goats with a follow-up of 6 months.J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:341-349.
31. Strnad Z, Strnad J, Povysil C, Urban K.Effect of plasmasprayed hydroxyapatite coating on osteoconductivity of comercially pure titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:483-490.
32. Liao H, Fartash B, Li J. Stability of hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium oral implants (IMZ). 2 retrieved cases.Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:68-72.
33. Rohrer MD, Sobczak RR, Prasad HS, Morris HF. Postmortem histologic evaluation of mandibular titanium and maxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from 1 patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:579-586.
34. Block MS, Gardiner D, Kent JN, Misiek DJ, Finger IM, Guerra L. Hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:626-633.
35. Wheeler SL. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11340-350.
36. Geurs NC, Jeffcoat RL, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:811-815.
37. McGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat MK. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric Omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:82-92.
38. Schwartz-Arad D, Mardinger O, Levin L, Kozlovsky A, Hirshberg A. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:238-244.
39. Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nishiguchi S, Nakamura T.Graded surface structure of bioactive titanium metal prepared by chemical treatment.J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:100-107.
40. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A. Improved retention and bone to implant contact with fluoride modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:659-666.
41. Ellingsen JE. On the properties of surface-modified yitanium. In: Davies JE (ed). Bone Engineering.Toronto: Em Squared, 2000:183-189.
42. Strnad J, Protivinsky J, Mazur D, et al. Interaction of acid and alkali treated titanium with dynamic simulated body environment. J Therm Anal Calorim 2004;76:17-31.
43. Jonásová L, Müller FA, Helebrand A, Strnad J, Greil P. Biomimetic apatite formation on chemically treated titanium. Biomaterials 2004;25:1187-1194.
44. Strnad J, Helebrant A, Mráz R. Effect of titanium processing on the bioactivity of sodium titanate gel layer. In: Stallforth H, Revell P (eds). Materials for Medical Engineering. Euromat 99 (vol 2). Weinheim: Wlley-VCH, 2000:133-139.
45. Strnad J, Helebrant A. Kinetics of bone-like apatite formation in simulate body fluid. In: Helebrant A, Maryska M, Kasa S (eds). Proceedings of the 5th ESG Conference, Glass Science and Technology for the 21 st Century. Prague: Czech Glass Society, 1999:9-16.
46. Jonásová L, Hlavác J. Effect of chemical treatment of titanium on apatite formation. In: Stallforth H, Revell P (eds). Materials for Medical Engineering. Euromat 99 (vol 2).Weinheim: WileyVCH, 2000:126-132
47. Strnad J, Helebrant A, Hamácková J. Bone-like apatite formation in titanium and silica glass. Glastechn Ber 2000;73(C1): 262-269.
48. Donath K, Breuner GA. Method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues.The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:318-321.
49. Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE,Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability. Clin Implant Dent and Relat Res 2001;3:2-8.
50. Rasmusson L, Meredith N,Cho H, Sennerby L.The influence of simultaneous vs delayed placement on stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:224-231.
51. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U.Comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurement of maxillary implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:297-303.
52. Rompen E, DaSilva D, Hockers T, et al. Influence of implant design on primary fit and stability. Applied Osseointegration Res 2001;2:9-11.
53. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signalling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials 2004;25:5947-5954.
54. Lampin M, Warocquier-Cclerout R, Legris C, et al. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability,cell adhesion and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99-108.
55. Webb K, Hlady V.Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:422-442.
56. El-Ghannam A, Ducheyne P, Shapiro IM. Formation of surface reaction products on bioactive glass and their effects on the expression of the osteoblastic phenotype and the deposition of mineralized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 1997;18:295-303.