Paleobiology of Pleistocene ground sloths (Xenarthra, Tardigrada): Biomechanics, morphogeometry and ecomorphology applied to the masticatory apparatus

Ameghiniana

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 175-196

  Bargo, M Susana ^a   Vizcaíno, Sergio F ^a  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Mammalia; Masticatory apparatus; Paleobiology; Tardigrada; Xenarthra

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; ECOMORPHOLOGY; GRASS; MAMMAL; MORPHOMETRY; PALEOBIOLOGY; PLEISTOCENE;

ARMATUS; EDENTATA; MAMMALIA; MEGATHERIIDAE; MEGATHERIUM AMERICANUM; MYLODON; MYLODONTIDAE; SLOTHS; TARDIGRADA; XENARTHRA;

EID: 47249130033     PISSN: 00027014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Ameghino F. 1889. Contribución al conocimiento de los mamíferos fósiles de la República Argentina. Actas de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba) 6:1-1027.
2. Bargo, M.S. 2001a. [El aparato masticatorio de los perezosos terrestres (Xenarthra, Tardigrada) del Pleistoceno de la Argentina. Morfometría y biomecánica. Tesis Doctoral Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. 400 pp. Unpublished.].
3. Bargo, M.S. 2001b. The ground sloth Megatherium americanum: skull shape, bite forces, and diet. Acta Paleontologica Polonica, Special Issue 46: 41-60.
4. Bargo, M.S. De Iuliis, G. andVizcaíno, S.F. 2006. Hypsodonty in Pleistocene ground sloths. Acta Paleontologica Polonica 51: 53-61.
5. Bargo, M.S., Toledo, N. and Vizcaíno, S.F. 2006. Muzzle of South American ground sloths (Xenarthra, Tardigrada). Journal of Morphology 267: 248-263.
6. Bargo, M.S., Vizcaíno, S.F., Archuby, F.M. and Blanco R.E. 2000. Limb bone proportions, strength and digging in some Lujanian (Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene) mylodontid ground sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 601-610.
7. Benson, R.H., Chapman, R.E. and Siegel, A.F. 1982. On the measurement of morphology and its change. Paleobiology 8: 328-339.
8. Bookstein, F.L. 1981. Coordinate systems and morphogenesis. En: T.G. Connelly, L.L. Brinkley, and B.M. Carlson (eds.), Morphogenesis and Pattern Formation. Raven Press, New York, pp. 265-287.
9. Burchell, W.J. 1817. Note sur une nouvelle espèce de Rhinoceros (Rh. simus). Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomatique: 96-97.
10. Cabrera, A. 1926. Sobre la alimentación del megaterio. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural 26: 388-391.
11. Carlini, A.A. and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 2004. The oldest Megalonychidae (Xenarthra: Tardigrada); phylogenetic relationships and an emended diagnosis of the family. Neues Jarburch Für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 233: 423-443.
12. Chapman, R.E. 1990a. Conventional Procrustes approaches. En: F.J. Rohlf y F.L. Bookstein (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometries Workshop. Special Publication Nr. 2, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 251-267.
13. Chapman, R.E. 1990b. Shape analysis in the study of dinosaur morphology. En: K. Carpenter y P.J. Currie (eds.), Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives y Approaches. Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-42.
14. Chiarello, A.G. 2008. Sloth ecology: an overview of field studies. En: W.J. Loughry y S.F. Vizcaino (eds.), The Biology of the Xenarthra, University Press of Florida, pp. 269-280.
15. Coltrain, J.B., Harris, J.M., Ceding, T.E., Ehleringer, J.R., Dearing, M.-D., Ward, J. and Allen, J. 2004. Rancho La Brea stable isotope biogeochemistry and its implications for the palaeoecology of late Pleistocene, coastal California. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 205:199-219.
16. Costa, R.L. and Greaves, W.S. 1981. Experimentally produced tooth wear facets and the direction of jaw motion. Journal of Paleontology 55: 635-638.
17. Cuvier, G. 1796. Notice sur le squelette d'une très-grande espèce de quadrupède inconnue jusqu'à présent, trouvé au Paraquay, et dé posé au cabinet d'histoire naturelle de Madrid. Magasin Encyclopédique: ou Journal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Arts 1796, 1: 303-310; 1796, 2: 227-228.
18. De Iuliis, G. 1996. [A systematic review of the Megatheriinae (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Megatheriidae). PhD Dissertation University of Toronto, Canada. 719 pp. Unpublisehd.].
19. De Iuliis, G., Bargo, M.S. and Vizcaíno, S.F. 2000. Variation in skull morphology and mastication in the fossil giant armadillos Pampatherium spp. y allied genera (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Pampatheriidae), with comments on their systematics and distribution. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 743-754.
20. Edgeworth, F.H. 1935. The cranial muscles of Vertebrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 493 pp.
21. Esteban, G. 1996. [Revisión de los Mylodontinae cuaternarios (Edentata, Tardigrada) de Argentina, Bolivia y Uruguay. Sistemática, Filogenia, Paleobiología, Paleozoogeografía y Paleoecologí a. Tesis Doctoral Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. 235 pp. Unpublisehd.].
22. Fariña, R.A. 1985. Some functional aspects of mastication in Glyptodontidae (Mammalia). Fortschritte der Zoologie 30: 277-280.
23. Fariña, R.A. 1988. Observaciones adicionales sobre la biomecánica masticatoria en Glyptodontidae (Mammalia; Edentata). Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica de Uruguay (2a. época) 4: 5-9.
24. Fariña, R.A. 1996. Trophic relationships among Lujanian mammals. Evolutionary Theory 11:125-134.
25. Fariña, R.A. and Blanco, R.E. 1996. Megatherium, the stabber. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 263:1725-1729.
26. Fariña, R.A. and Vizcaíno, S.F. 2001. Carved teeth and strange jaws: How glyptodonts masticated. Acta Paleontologica Polonica, Special Issue 46: 87-102.
27. Ferigolo, J. 1985. Evolutionary trends of the histological pattern in the teeth of Edentata (Xenarthra). Archives Oral Biology 30: 71-82.
28. Gaudin, T.J. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada): the craniodental evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 255-305.
29. -1 Amérique méridionale. Comptes Rendus de V Académie des Sciences 40:1112-1114.
30. Greaves, W. S. 1973. The inference of jaw motion from tooth wear facets. Journal of Paleontology 47:1000-1001.
31. Greaves, W.S. 1978. The jaw lever system in ungulates: a new model. Journal of Zoology 184: 271-285.
32. Greaves, W.S. 1980. The mammalian jaw mechanism: the high glenoid cavity. The American Naturalist 116: 432-440.
33. Harlan, R. 1825. Fauna Americana: bring a description of the mammiferous animals inhabiting North America. Philadelphia: Anthony Finley; J. Harding, pp. 199-203.
34. Hiiemae, K.M. 1978. Mammalian mastication: a review of the activity of the jaw muscles and the movements they produce in chewing. En: P.M. Butler y K.A. Joysey (eds.), Development, function and evolution of teeth, Academic Press, London, pp. 359-398.
35. Hiiemae, K.M. and Crompton, A.W. 1985. Mastication, food transport, and swallowing. En: M. Hildebrand, D.M. Bramble, K.F. Liem y D.B. Wake (eds.), Functional Vertebrate Morphology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London, pp. 262-290.
36. Hofmann, R.R. and Stewart, D.R.M. 1972. Grazer or browser: a classification based on the stomach structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia 36: 226-240.
37. Illiger, C. 1811. Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium additis terminis zoographicis utriusque classis. C. Salfeld, Berolini, 301 pp.
38. Janis, C.M. 1995. Correlations between craniodental morphology and feeding behavior in ungulates: reciprocal illumination between living and fossil taxa. En: J. Thomason (ed.), Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Palaeontology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 76-98.
39. Janis, C.M. 1988. An estimation of tooth volume and hypsodonty indices in Ungulate mammals, and the correlation of these factors with dietary preference. En: D.E. Russell, J.P. Santoro y D. Sigogneau-Russell (eds.), Teeth revisited: Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Memoirs de Musée national d'Histoire naturelle (serie C) 53: 367-387.
40. Janis, C.M. and Ehrhardt, D. 1988. Correlation of the muzzle width and relative incisor width with dietary preference in ungulates. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 92: 267-284.
41. Janis, C.M. and Fortelius, M. 1988. On the means whereby mammals achieve increased functional durability of their dentitions, with special reference to limiting factors. Biological Review 63:197-230.
42. Kalthoff, D. and Tütken, 2007. Stable isotope composition of extant xenarthran teeth and their potencial fr the reconstruction of the diet of fosil xenarthrans (Mammalia). 8° International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology (Paris), Abstracts: 62.
43. Kraglievich, L. 1922. Estudio sobre los Mylodontinae. Análisis comparado de los valores craneométricos de los milodontinos de Norte y Sud América. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 31: 457-464.
44. Kraglievich, L. 1923. Descripción comparada de los cráneos de Scelidodon rothi Ameghino y Scelidotherium parodii n. sp. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 33: 57-103.
45. Kraglievich, L. 1928. "Mylodon darwini" Owen es la especie genotipo de "Mylodon" Owen. Rectificación de la nomenclatura genérica de los milodontes. Physis 9:169-185.
46. Kraglievich, L. 1934. Contribución al conocimiento de Mylodon darwini Owen y especies afines. Revista del Museo de La Plata 34: 255-292.
47. Lydekker, R. 1886. Description of three species of Scelidotherium. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 496-497.
48. Lydekker, R. 1894. Contributions to a knowledge of the fossil vertebrates of Argentina, Part II: The extinct edentates of Argentina. Anales del Museo de La Plata (Paleontología Argentina) 3:1-118.
49. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classis, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 824 pp.
50. Lund, P.W. 1842. Buk paa Brasiliens Dyreverden for Sidste Jordomvaeltning. Fjerde Afhandling: Fortsaettelse af Pattedyrene. Detkongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. Naturvidenskabelige og Mathematisk Afhandlingex 9:137-208.
51. Macalister, A. 1869. On the myology of Bradypus tridactylus; with remarks on the general anatomy of the Edentata. Annual Magazine of Natural History 4: 51-67.
52. Maynard Smith, J. and Savage, R.J.G. 1959. The mechanics of mammalian jaws. School Sciences Review 141: 289-301.
53. McDonald, H.G. 1987. [A systematic review of the Plio-Pleistocene scelidothere ground sloths (Mammalia: Xenarthra, Mylodontidae). PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto. 478 pp. Unpublished.].
54. McDonald, H.G. 1995. Gravigrade Xenarthrans from the early Pleistocene Leisey Shell Pit IA, Hillsborough County, Florida. Bulletin of Florida Museum of Natural History 37: 345-373.
55. McDonald, H.G. and De Iuliis, G. 2008. Fossil history of sloths. En: W.J. Loughry y S.F. Vizcaíno (eds.), The Biology of the Xenarthra, University Press of Florida, pp. 39-55.
56. Mendoza, M. and Palmqvist, P. 2008. Hypsodonty in ungulates: an adaptation for grass consumption or for foraging in open habitat? Journal of Zoology 274:134-142.
57. Mendoza, M., Janis, C. and Palmqvist, P. 2002. Characterizing complex craniodental patterns related to feeding behavior in ungulates: a multivariate approach. Journal of Zoology London 258: 223-246.
58. Merino, M.L., Milne, N. and Vizcaíno, S.F. 2005. A morphometric study of deer (Mammalia, Cervidae) crania from Argentina using three dimensional landmarks. Acta Theriologica 50: 91-108.
59. Moore, D.M. 1978. Post-glacial vegetation in the south Patagonian territory of the giant ground sloth, Mylodon. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 77:177-202.
60. Moore, W.J. 1981. The Mammalian Skull. Cambridge University Press, 369 pp.
61. Naples, V.L. 1982. Cranial osteology and function in the tree sloths, Bradypus and Choloepus. American Museum Novitates 2739:1-41.
62. Naples, V.L. 1985. Form and function of the masticatory musculature in the tree sloths, Bradypus and Choloepus. Journal of Morphology 183: 25-50.
63. Naples, V.L. 1987. Reconstruction of cranial morphology and analysis of function in the Pleistocene ground sloth Nothrotheriops shastense (Mammalia, Megatheriidae). Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History 389:1-21.
64. Naples, V.L. 1989. The feeding mechanism in the Pleistocene ground sloth, Glossotherium. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History 415:1-23.
65. Owen, R. 1839. Fossil Mammalia (2). En: CR. Darwin (ed.), The Zoology of the Voyage of the M.S.H. Beagle, London, 1(7): 41-64.
66. Owen, R. 1840. Fossil Mammalia (4). En: CR. Darwin (ed.), The Zoology of the Voyage of the M.S.H. Beagle, London, 1(13): 81-111.
67. Owen, R. 1842. Description of the skeleton of an extinct gigantic sloth, Mylodon robustus, Owen, with observations on the osteology, natural affinities, and probable habits of the megatherioid quadruped in general. R. and J. E. Taylor, London, 176 pp.
68. Owen, R. 1843. Letter from Richard Owen, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S. etc., etc., on Dr. Harlan's notice of new fossil Mammalia. American Journal of Sciences and Arts 44: 341-345.
69. Owen R. 1856. On the Megatherium (Megatherium americanum Cuvier and Blumenbach). III. The skull. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 146: 571-589.
70. Owen R. 1857. On the Scelidothere (Scelidotherium leptocephalum) Owen. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 147: 101-110.
71. Owen, R. 1860. Memoir on the Megatherium or Giant Ground-Sloth of America (Megatherium americanum, Cuvier). Taylor y Francis, London, 84 pp.
72. Plotnick, R. and Baumiller, T.K. 2000. Invention by evolution: functional analysis in paleobiology. En: D.H. Erwin y S.L. Wing (eds.), Deep Time. Paleobiology's perspective. Supplement to Paleobiology 26: 305-321.
73. Pérez, L.M., Scillato-Yané, G.J. and Vizcaíno, S.F. 2000. Estudio morfofuncional del aparato hioideo de Glyptodon sp. (Cingulata, Glyptodontidae). Ameghiniana 37: 293-299.
74. Rensberger, J.M. 1973. An occlusion model for mastication and dental wear in herbivorous mammals. Journal of Paleontology 47: 515-528.
75. Scillato-Yané, G.J. 1977. Octomylodontinae: nueva subfamilia de Mylodontidae (Edentata,Tardigrada). Descripción del cráneo y mandíbula de Octomylodon robertoscagliai n.sp., procedentes de la formación Arroyo Chasicó (Edad Chasiquense, Plioceno temprano) del sur de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Algunas consideraciones filogenéticas y sistemáticas sobre los Mylodontoidea. Publicaciones del Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Mar del Plata L. Scaglia 2:123-140.
76. Scillato-Yané, G.J. 1986. Los Xenarthra fósiles de Argentina (Mammalia, Edentata). 4° Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía (Mendoza), Actas 2:151-165.
77. Sicher, H. 1944. Masticatory apparatus of the sloths. Fieldiana: Zoology 29:161-168.
78. Sinclair, W.J. 1905. New Mammalia from the Quaternary caves of California. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geology 4: 145-161.
79. Smith, K.K. 1993.The form of the feeding apparatus in terrestrial vertebrates: studies of adaptation and constraint. En: J. Hanken y B.K. Hall (eds.), The skull, volume 3: Functional y Evolutionary mechanisms. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago y London, pp. 150-196.
80. Solounias, N. and Dawson-Saunders, B. 1988. Dietary adaptations and palaeoecology of the late Miocene ruminants from Pikermi and Samos in Greece. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 65:149-172.
81. Solounias, N. and Moelleken, S.M. 1993. Dietary adaptation of some extinct ruminants determined by premaxillary shape. Journal of Mammalogy 74:1059-1071.
82. Solounias, N., Teaford, M. and Walker, A. 1988. Interpreting the diet of extinct ruminants: the case of a non-browsing giraffid. Paleobiology 14: 287-300.
83. Spencer, L.M. 1995. Morphological correlates of dietary resource partitioning in the African Bovidae. Journal of Mammalogy 76: 448-471.
84. Spillman, F. 1948. Beiträge zur Kenntnis eines neuen gravigraden Riesensteppentieres (Eremotherium carolinense gen. et spec. nov.), seines Lebensraumes und seiner Lebensweise. Paleobiologica 8: 231-279.
85. Stock, C. 1925. Cenozoic gravigrade edentates of Western North America with special reference to the Pleistocene Megalonychinae and Mylodontidae of Rancho La Brea. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications 331: 1-206.
86. Turnbull, W.D. 1970. Mammalian masticatory apparatus. Fieldiana Geology 18:149-356.
87. Turnbull, W.D. 1976. Restoration of masticatory musculature of Tliylacosmylus. En: CS. Churcher (ed.), Essays on Palaeontology in Honour of Loris Shano Rüssel, Athlon, Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Miscellaneous Publication, pp. 169-185.
88. Vizcaíno, S.F. 1994. Mecánica masticatoria de Stegotherium tessellatum Ameghino (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Mioceno temprano de Santa Cruz (Argentina). Algunos aspectos paleoecológicos relacionados. Ameghiniana 31: 283-290.
89. Vizcaíno, S.F. 2000.Vegetation partitioning among Lujanian (late Pleistocene-early Holocene) armored herbivores in the pampean region. Current Research in the Pleistocene 17:135-137.
90. Vizcaíno, S.F. and Bargo, M.S. 1998. The masticatory apparatus of Eutatus (Mammalia, Cingulata) and some allied genera. Evolution y paleobiology. Paleobiology 24: 371-383.
91. Vizcaino, S.F, and De Iuliis, G. 2003. Evidence for advanced carnivory in fossil armadillos (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Dasypodidae). Paleobiology 29:123-138.
92. Vizcaino, S.F. and Fariña, R.A. 1997. Diet and locomotion of the armadillo Peltephilus: a new view. Lethaia 30: 79-86.
93. Vizcaíno, S.F., De Iuliis, G. and Bargo, M.S. 1998. Skull shape, masticatory apparatus, and diet of Vassallia y Holmesina (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Pampatheriidae). When anatomy constrains destiny. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 5: 291-322.
94. Vizcaíno, S.F., Bargo, M.S. and Cassini, G.H. 2006. Dental occlusal surface area in relation to body mass, food habits and other biologic features in fossil Xenarthrans. Ameghiniana 43: 11-26.
95. Vizcaino, S.F., Zarate, M., Bargo, M.S. and Dondas, A. 2001. Pleistocene large burrows in the Mar del Plata area (Buenos Aires Province, Argentina) and their probable builders. Acta Paleontológica Polonica, Special Issue 46:157-169
96. Vizcaíno, S.F., M.S. Bargo, R.F. Kay and N. Milne. 2006. The armadillos (Mammalia, Xenarthra) of the Santa Cruz Formation (early-middle Miocene). An approach to their paleobioloy. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 237: 255-269.
97. Webb, S.D. 1985. The interrelationships of tree sloths y ground sloths. En: G.G. Montgomery (ed.), The Evolution y Ecology of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 105-112.
98. White, J.L. 1997. Locomotor adaptations in Miocene Xenarthrans. En: R.F. Kay, R.H. Madden, R.L. Cifelli, y J.J. Flynn (eds.), Vertebrate Paleontology in the Neotropics. The Miocene Fauna of La Venta, Colombia, Smithsonian Institution Press, 16: 246-264.
99. Windle, B.C.A. and Parsons, F.G. 1899. On the myology of Edentata. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1: 314-339.
100. Winge, H. 1941. Edentates (Edentata). En: S. Jensen, R. Spärck y H. Volsoe (eds.), The Interrelationships of the Mammalia genera, Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen, pp. 319-341.