To help or not to help a service robot Bystander intervention as a resource in human-robot collaboration

Interaction Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 455-477

  Hüttenrauch, Helge ^a   Eklundh, Kerstin Severinson ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bystander; Collaboration; Human Robot Interaction (HRI)

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249118327     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.7.3.15hut     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Heritage Dictionary of the English language. 4th Edition (2000), Houghton Mifflin Company; online: dictionary.com
2. Bensch, R., Truwin, W. (1977). Ethik. Philosophisches Kolleg, Heft 3, Patmos Verlag Dsseldorf, Germany. (in German).
3. Bono, Mayumi, Suzuki, Noriko, and Katagiri, Yasuhiro. (2003). An Analysis of Participation Structure in Conversation Based on Interaction Corpus of Ubiquitous Sensor Data. In:Conference of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT03), pp. 713-716, Rautenberg, M., Menozzi, M., and Wesson, J. (eds.), IOS Press, IFIP, 2003.
4. Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
5. Cypher, Allen. (1986). The Structure of Users Activities. In: Norman, Donald A. and Draper, Stephen W. (eds.), User Centered System Design-New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, pp: 243-264. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
6. Dix, A., Finlay, J, Abowd, G., Beale, R. (1998). Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall Europe, Pearson Education Ltd.
7. Dourish, Paul. (2001). Where the Action Is: the Foundations of Embodied Interaction. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.
8. Eason, Ken. (1988). Information Technology and Organisational Change. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
9. Faulkner, Christine. (1998). The Essence of Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Limited.
10. Fong, T. (2001). Collaborative Control: A Robot-Centric Model for Vehicle Teleoperation, Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-01-34, Doctoral Dissertation, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, November 2001.
11. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 42, (3-4), March 2003, pp.143-166. Elsevier Science.
12. Green, A., Httenrauch, H., Oestreicher, L., Severinson-Eklundh, K., Norman, M. (2000). User Centered Design for Intelligent Service Robots. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (RO-MAN 2000) pp.161-166.
13. Grice, H. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: (P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.)), Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
14. Hudson, Scott, Fogarty, James, Atkeson, Christopher, Avrahami, Daniel, Forlizzi, Jodi, Kiesler, Sara, Lee, Johnny, and Yang, Jie. (2003). Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors: a Wizard of Oz Feasibility Study. Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI03), pp: 257-264, ACM Press.
15. Httenrauch, H. and Severinson Eklundh, K. (2002). Fetch-And-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot. In Proc.11th IEEE Intern. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2002). pp.158-163.
16. Kirlik, A. (1993). Modeling strategic behavior in human-Automation interaction: Why and aid can (and should) go unused). Human Factors, 35, 221-243.
17. Latan, Bibb and Darley, John M. (1970). The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesnt he Help?, New York Appleton-Century-Crofts; Meredith Corporation,. The Holy Bible, Luke 10:25-37, Parable of the Good Samaritan.
18. McFarlane, D. (1998), Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction, Doctoral Dissertation, George Washington University, USA.
19. Miyata, Yoshiro, and Norman, Donald A. (1986). Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities. In: (Norman, Donald A. And Draper, Stephen W. (eds.)), User Centered System Design-New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 265-284. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
20. Nicolescu, Monica, Matari?, Maja J. (2003). Linking Perception and Action in a Control Architecture for Human-Robot Domains. In: Proceedings, 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), Hawaii, 2003.
21. Rogers, E., and Murphy, R. (2001), DARPA/NFS Study on Human-Robot Interaction, Invitation Workshop, Sept.29-30, 2001, San Luis Obispo, CA; website: www.csc.calpoly. edu/~erogers/HRI/ for online Final Report (as of: 2003-12-19).
22. Sheridan, Thomas B. (1992). Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London, England.
23. Shneiderman, B., and Maes, P. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. interface agents: Excerpts from debates at IUI 97 and CHI 97. Interactions, 4(6), 42-61.
24. Svensson, M. (2003). Defining, Designing and Evaluating Social Navigation, Doctoral Dissertation, SICS-P-333-SE, Dept. of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University / Royal Institute of Technology.
25. Wullschleger, F.H. and Brega, R. (2002). The paradox of service robots-how passers-by can contribute in solving non-deterministic exceptional conditions encountered by service robots, Intern. Conference on Intelligent Robots and System, (IROS 2002). IEEE/ RSJ, Vol. 2, pp.126-1131.
26. Yamamoto, Y., Sato, M., Hiraki, K., Yamasaki, N., Anzai, Y. (1992). A request of the robot: an experiment with the human-robot interactive system HuRIS, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1-3 Sep 1992, pp. 204-209.