Cognitive and linguistic factors in interactive knowledge construction

Discourse Processes

Volumn 45, Issue 4-5, 2008, Pages 289-297

  Verhoeven, Ludo ^a   Graesser, Arthur ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b University of Memphis

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249113526     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530802145353     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
2. Bolter, J. D., & Gromala, D. (2003). Windows and mirrors: Interaction design, digital art and the myth of transparency. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
3. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind experience and school. Washington, DC: Academic.
4. Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Hasselbring, T., Kinzer, C., & Williams, S. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 114-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
6. Goldman, S. R., & Bloome, D. M. (2004). Learning to construct and integrate. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festshrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer (pp. 169-182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Graesser, A. C., King, B. G., & Chipman, P. (2008). Computer mediated technologies. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.; pp. 211-224). London: Taylor & Francis.
8. Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (2004). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
12. McNamara, D. (Ed.). (2007). Theories of text comprehension: The importance of reading strategies to theoretical foundations of reading comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
14. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113.
15. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 51-71.
16. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-214). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53, 47-58.
18. Schwartz, D. L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Educational technology, research and development. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
19. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
20. Tardieu, H., & Gyselinck, V. (2003). Working memory constraints in the integration and comprehension of information in a multimedia context. In H. van Oostendorp (Ed.), Cognition in a digital world (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293-301.
22. Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Predictors of text comprehension development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407-423.
23. Verhoeven, L., Segers, E., Bronkhorst, J., & Boves, L. (2006). Toward interactive literacy education in the Netherlands. In M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 41-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Wiley, J., & Schooler, J. (2001). The mental web: Pedagogical and cognitive implications of the net. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Teaching and learning on the World Wide Web (pp. 243-257). New York: Academic.