Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case - Control studies of gene-environment interaction

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 2756-2783

  Zhang, Li ^a   Mukherjee, Bhramar ^b   Ghosh, Malay ^c   Gruber, Stephen ^b   Moreno, Victor ^b,d  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c University of Florida   (United States)

^d BELLVITGE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE IDIBELL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Case only method; Gene environment independence; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

SULFOTRANSFERASE 1A1;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HEREDITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; WILD TYPE;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CLASSIFICATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 47249104782     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3044     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Greenland S. Statistical uncertainty due to misclassification: implications for validation sub-studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1988; 41:1167-1176.
2. Greenland S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. International Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 25:1107-1115.
3. Spiegelman D, Rosner B, Logan R. Estimation and inference for logistic regression with covariate misclassification and measurement error, in main study/validation study designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95:51-61.
4. Bashir SA, Duffy SW. The correction of risk estimates for measurement error. Annals of Epidemiology 1997; 7:156-164.
5. Gustafson P. Measurement Error and Misclassification in Statistics and Epidemiology: Impacts and Bayesian Adjustments. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: London, Boca Raton, 2004.
6. Rice K, Holmans P. Allowing for genotyping error in analysis of unmatched case-control studies. Annals of Human Genetics 2003; 67:165-174.
7. Rice K. Full-likelihood approaches to misclassification of a binary exposure in matched case-control studies. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:3177-3194.
8. Greenland S, Kleinbaum DG. Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 1983; 12:93-97.
9. Greenland S. On correcting for misclassification in twin studies and other matched pair studies. Statistics in Medicine 1989; 8:825-829.
10. Armstrong BG, Whittemore AS, Howe GR. Analysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer. Statistics in Medicine 1989; 8:1151-1163.
11. Satten GA, Carroll RJ. Conditional and unconditional categorical regression models with missing covariates. Biometrics 2000; 56:384-388.
12. Paik MC, Sacco R. Matched case - control data analyses with missing covariates. Applied Statistics 2000; 49: 145-156.
13. Huberman M, Langholz B. Application of the missing-indicator method in matched case-control studies with incomplete data. American Journal of Epidemiology 1999; 150:1340-1345.
14. Piegorsch WW, Weinberg CR, Taylor JA. Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population based case-control studies. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13:153-162.
15. Umbach DM, Weinberg CR. Designing and analyzing case-control studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16:1731-1743.
16. Chatterjee N, Carroll R. Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation exploiting gene-environment independence in case-control studies. Biometrika 2005; 92:399-418.
17. Garcia-Closas M, Thompson WD, Robins JM. Differential misclassification and the assessment of gene-environment interactions in case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 147:426-433.
18. Garcia-Closas M, Rothman N, Lubin J. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 1999; 8:1043-1050.
19. Cheng KF. Analysis of case-only studies accounting for genotyping error. The Annals of Human Genetics 2007; 71:238-249.
20. Cheng KF. A maximum likelihood method for studying gene-environment interactions under conditional independence of genotype and exposure. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3093-3109.
21. Botto LD, Khury MJ. Commentary: facing the challenge of gene-environment interaction: the two-by-four table and beyond. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 153(10):1016-1020.
22. Gustafson P, Le ND, Saskin R. Case-control analysis with partial knowledge of exposure misclassification probabilities. Biometrics 2001; 57:598-609.
23. Cheng KF, Lin WJ. Retrospective analysis of case-control studies when the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:3289-3310.
24. Lin DY, Zeng D. Likelihood-based inference on haplotype effects in genetic association studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2006; 101:89-102.
25. Clayton D, McKeigue PM. Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases. Lancet 2001; 358:1356-1360.
26. Lai R, Zhang H, Yang Y. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors. Genetic Epidemiology 2007; 31:143-153.
27. Gordon D, Yang Y, Haynes C, Finch SJ, Mendell NR, Brown AM, Haroutunian V. Increasing power for tests of genetic association in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype error by use of double-sampling. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004; 3(1):Article 26.
28. Chatterjee N, Kalaylioglu Z, Carroll R. Exploiting gene-environment independence in family-based case-control studies: increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects. Genetic Epidemiology 2005; 28:138-156.
29. Landi S, Gemignani F, Moreno V, Gioia-Patricola L, Chabrier A, Guino E, Navarro M, de Oca J, Capella G, Canzian F. A comprehensive analysis of phase I and phase II metabolism gene polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics 2005; 15(8):535-546.
30. Moreno V, Glatt H, Guino E, Fisher E, Meinl W, Navarro M, Badosa JM, Boeing H. Bellvitge Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Polymorphisms in sulfotransferases SULT1A1 and SULT1A2 are not related to colorectal cancer. International Journal of Cancer 2005; 113(4):683-686.
31. Mukherjee B, Zhang L, Ghosh M, Sinha S. Bayesian semiparametric analysis of case-control data under conditional gene-environment independence. Biometrics 2007; in press. Available at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ j.1541-0420.2007.00750.x.
32. Gordon D, Heath SC, Liu X, Ott J. A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data. American Journal of Human Genetics 2001; 69:371-380.
33. Morris RW, Kaplan NL. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors. Genetic Epidemiology 2004; 26(2): 142-154.