Case-control analysis with partial knowledge of exposure misclassification probabilities

Biometrics

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 598-609

  Gustafson, Paul ^a   Le, Nhu D ^a,b   Saskin, Refik ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Case control analysis; Misclassification; Nonidentifiability

Indexed keywords

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CASE-CONTROL; CASE-CONTROL ANALYSE; CONTROL ANALYSIS; EXPOSURE MISCLASSIFICATION; MISCLASSIFICATION PROBABILITY; MISCLASSIFICATIONS; NONIDENTIFIABILITY; ODD RATIOS; PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; PATIENT CODING; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0034997533     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00598.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blettner, M. and Wahrendorf, J. (1984). What does an observed relative risk convey about possible misclassification? Methods of Information in Medicine 41, 923-937.
2. Chib, S. and Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis Hastings algorithm. American Statistician 49, 327-335.
3. Dawid, A. P. (1979). Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 41, 1-31.
4. Gelfand, A. E. and Sahu, S. K. (1999). Identifiability, improper priors, arid Gibbs sampling for generalized linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 247-253.
5. Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398-409.
6. Joseph, L., Gyorkos, T. W., and Coupal, L. (1995). Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. American Journal of Epidemiology 141, 263-272.
7. Kadane, J. B. (1975). The role of identification in Bayesian theory. In Studies in Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics, S. Fienberg and A. Zellner (eds), 175-191. Amsterdam: North Holland.
8. Marshall, J. R. (1989). The use of dual or multiple reports in epidemiologic studies. Statistics in Medicine 8, 1041-1049.
9. Neath, A. A. and Samaniego, F. J. (1997). On the efficacy of Bayesian inference for nonidentifiable models. American Statistician 51, 225-232.
10. Rahme, E., Joseph, L., and Gyorkos, T. W. (2000). Bayesian sample size determination for estimating binomial parameters from data subject to misclassification. Applied Statistics 49, 119-128.
11. Rosin, M. P., Cheng, X., Poh, C., Lam, W. L., Huang, Y., Lovas, J., Berean, K., Epstein, J. B., Priddy, R., Le, N. D., and Zhang, L. (2000). Use of allelic loss to predict malignant risk for low-grade oral epithelial dysplasia. Clinical Cancer Research 6, 357-362.
12. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Freedman, L. S., and Parmar, M. K. B. (1994). Bayesian approaches to randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 157, 357-387.
13. Thomas, D., Stram, D., and Dwyer, J. (1993). Exposure measurement error: Influence on exposure disease relationships and methods of correction. Annual Review of Public Health 14, 69-93.
14. Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Annals of Statistics 22, 1701-1728.
15. Walter, S. D. and Irwig, L. M. (1988). Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: A review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 41, 923-937.