Personality characteristics in a sample of subjects complaining harassment in the workplace;Caratteristiche di personalita in un campione di soggetti che lamentano vessazioni sul posto di lavoro

Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia

Volumn 30, Issue 1 SUPPL. A, 2008, Pages

  Raho, C ^a   Giorgi, I ^a   Bonfiglio, N S ^b   Argentero, P ^b  

^a IRCCS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

MMPI 2; Mobbing; Personality characteristics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MMPI; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 47249101515     PISSN: 15927830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Leymann H. The content and development of bullying at work. European Journal of work and organizational Psychology 1996; 5 (2): 165-184.
2. Zapf D, Knorz C, Kulla M. On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment and health outcome. European Journal of work and organizational Psychology 1996; 5: 215-237.
3. Einarsen S. Bullying and harassment at work: a review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violence Behaviour 2000; 5: 379-401.
4. Vartia M. Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its target and observers of bullying. Scan J Work Env Hea 2001; 27: 63-69.
5. Einarsen S. The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower 1999; 20: 16-27.
6. Coyne I, Seigne E, Randall P. Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of work and organizational Psychology 2000; 9: 335-349.
7. Brodsky CM. The harassed worker. Toronto, Canada: Lexintongton Books, 1976.
8. Einarsen S, Raknes B, Matthiesen SB, Hellesøn OH. Bullying and tough interpersonal conflicts: health injurious interaction at the work place. Bergen, Norway: stigma Forlag, 1994.
9. Zapf D, Einarsen S. Individual antecedentes of bullying. In Einarsen S, Hoel D, Zapf & C. L. Cooper eds, Bullying and emotional abuse in workplace: International perpectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003.
10. Gandolfo R. MMPI-2 profiles of worker's compensation claimant who present with complaints of harassment. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51 : 711-715.
11. Hathaway SR, McKilley JC. MMPI-2. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali, 1995.
12. Butcher JN, Williams CL. Fondamenti per l'interpretazione del MMPI-2 e del MMPI A. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali 1996.
13. Graham JR. MMPI 2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.
14. Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S. MMPI-2 configuration among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of work and organizational Psychology 2001; 10:476-484.
15. Einarsen S, Hole H. The Negative Acts Questionnaire: Development, Validation and Revision of Measure of Bullying at Work. Predented at the teanth European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology: Globalization - Opportunities and Threats. Prague, Czech republic. 2001.
16. Glasø L, Matthiesen S.B, Nielsen M.B, Einarsen S. Do target of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scand J Psychol 2007; 48: 313-319.
17. Girardi P, Monaco E, Prestigiacomo C, Talamo A, Ruberto A, Tatarelli R. Personality and psychopathological profiles in individuals exposed to mobbing. Violence Vict. 2007; 22: 172-88.
18. Rocco A, Martocchia A, Frugoni P, Baldini R, Sani G, Di Simone Di Giuseppe B, Vairano A, Girardi P, Monaco E, Tatarelli R, Falaschi P. Inverse correlation between morning plasma cortisol levels and MMPI psychasthenia and depression scale scores in victims of mobbing with adjustment disorders. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007; 28: 610-3.
19. Argentero P, Bonfiglio NS, Zanaletti W, La percezione del mobbing: alcune determinanti individuali ed organizzative. Risorsa Uomo - Rivista di Psicologia del lavoro e dell'organizzazione 2004; 2-3: 231-253.
20. Giorgi I, Argentero P, Zanaletti W, Candura SM, Un modello di valutazione psicologica del mobbing. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2004; 26(2): 127-132.
21. Argentero P, Bonfiglio NS, Giorgi I, Mariani MG, Zanaletti W. Aspetti di validità di un questionario per la valutazione dell'autopercezione di mobbing: il QAM 1.6. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata 2007; 253:47-61.
22. Argentero P. Bonfiglio SN, Giorgi I. Norme di utilizzo del QAM 1.6: uno strumento per la valutazione dell'autopercezione del mobbing. In corso di stampa.