Breast MR imaging at 3.0 T

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 319-320

  Mountford, Carolyn E ^a   Stanwell, Peter ^a   Ramadan, Saadallah ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LETTER; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY; RELAXATION TIME; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ADULT; AGED; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOTE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROC CURVE; TIME;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 47249096225     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481072049     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 2006;239(3):666-676.
2. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007;244(2):356-378.
3. Kuhl CK. Current status of breast MR imaging. 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007;244(3):672-691.
4. Kuhl CK, Kooijman H, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 T [letter]. Radiology 2007;244(3):929-930.
5. Rakow-Penner R, Daniel B, Yu H, Sawyer-Glover A, Glover GH. Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:87-91.
6. Norris DG. High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:519-529.
7. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Gieseke J, Kuhl C, et al. MRI of the pelvis at 3 T: very high spatial resolution with sensitivity encoding and flip-angle sweep technique in clinically acceptable scan time. Eur Radiol 2006;16:634-641.
8. Mountford C, Stanwell P, Giuffre B, et al. Contrast enhanced MRM of the breast and spectroscopy of the primary lesion and infiltrating loco-regional lymph nodes at 3T [abstr]. Eur Radiol 2006;16(suppl 5):E62-E63.