Innovation in project management: Voices of researchers

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 586-589

  Geraldi, Joana G ^a   Rodney Turner, J ^b   Maylor, Harvey ^c   Söderholm, Anders ^d   Hobday, Mike ^e   Brady, Tim ^e  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Lille School of Management   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^d MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Project management research

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE (BOK); ELSEVIER (CO); INTERNATIONAL RESEARCHES; PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; INNOVATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 47249090390     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Turner J.R. Towards a theory of project management: the nature of the project. Edit. Int. J. Project Manage. 24 1 (2006) 1-3
2. Winter M., Smith C., Morris P., and Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int. J. Project Manage. 24 8 (2006) 638-649
3. Sauer C., and Reich B.H. What do we want from a theory of project management? A response to Rodney Turner, Guest editorial. Int. J. Project Manage. 25 1 (2007) 1-2 See for instance
4. Shenhar A.J, Wideman R.M. Project management: from genesis to content to classification. In: Oper. Res. Manage. Sci Conf. (INFORMS), Washington, DC; 1996.
5. In: Hodgson D., and Cicmil S. (Eds). Making projects critical (2006), Palgrave Macmillan, London
6. Buckle P., and Thomas J. Deconstructing project management: a gender analysis of project management guidelines. Int. J. Project Manage. 21 6 (2003) 433-441
7. Cicmil S., Williams T., Thomas J., and Hodgson D. Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 24 8 (2006) 675-686
8. Engwall M. Moving out of Plato's Cave: toward a multi-project perspective on project organizing. Working Paper, Fenix Research Program; 2000.
9. Smyth H.J., and Pryke S. The management of complex projects: a relationship approach (2006), Blackwell Publishing
10. Söderlund J. Shaping and shifting project epochs. In: VIII IRNOP: projects in innovations, innovations in projects. Brighton, UK; 2007.
11. Söderlund J. Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. Int. J. Project Manage. 22 3 (2004) 183-191
12. L. Taxén, J. Lillesköld, Images as action instruments in complex projects, In: VIII IRNOP: projects in innovations, innovations in projects. Brighton, UK; 2007.
13. Midler C. "Projectification" of the firm: the renault case. Scand. J. Manage. 11 4 (1995) 363-375
14. KPMG. KPMG's international 2002-2003. Programme management survey. Australia: KPMG; 2002.
15. NAO. Driving the successful delivery of major defence projects: effective project control is a key factor in successful projects. HC 20 Session 2005-2006; 20.05.2005.
16. Whittaker B. What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Infor. Manage. Comput. Secur. 7 1 (1999) 23-29
17. PMI, Guide to the project management body of knowledge-PMBOK, third ed. PMI, 2003.
18. APM. Body of knowledge: APM, 2000.
19. Highsmith J. Agile project management (2004), Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam
20. Stribling J, Krohn M, Aguayo, D. SCIgen - An automatic CS paper generator SCIgen homepage, 2007. Retrieved 25.01.2008, from http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/.
21. Ball P. Computer conference welcomes gobbledegook paper. Nature 2005, 434. Retrieved 21.04.2005, from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7036/full/nature03653.html.
22. Morris P.W.G. The Management of Projects (1994), Thomas Telford
23. Brown L.S., and Eisenhardt M.K. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42 1 (1997) 1-34
24. Engwall M, Hällgren M, Söderholm A. Dealing with deviations: investigating coupling mechanisms in project management. In: VIII IRNOP: projects in innovations, innovations in projects. Brighton, UK; 2007.
25. Crawford L H., Hobbs J.B., and Turner J.R. Project categorization systems: aligning capability with strategy for better results. Project Manage. Inst. (2005), Upper Darby, PA
26. Hodgson D. Project work: the legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization 11 1 (2004) 81-100
27. Nightingale P. The product-process-organisation relationship in complex development projects. Res. Policy 29 7 (2000) 913-930
28. Styhre A. The bureaucratization of the project manager function: The case of the construction industry. Int. J. Project Manage. 24 3 (2006) 271-276
29. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. Empirical model-building and response surface (1986), Wiley, New York
30. Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. (1996), University Of Chicago Press
31. Bredillet, C. Shikumidukuri vs. One Best (no) Way! Project and programme management for enterprise innovation (P2M): toward a new paradigm? In: Proceedings of VIII IRNOP: projects in innovations, innovations in projects, Brighton, UK; 2007.
32. Ashby W.R. An introduction to cybernetics (1965), Methuen, London