Erratum: "Hyperlink format, categorization abilities and memory span as contributors to deaf users' hypertext accessibility" (Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education vol. 13 (2) (241-256) 10.1093/deafed/enm058);Hyperlink format, categorization abilities and memory span as contributors to deaf users hypertext access

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 87-102

  Farjardo, Inmaculada ^a,d   Arfé, Barbara ^b   Benedetti, Patrizia ^c   Altoé, Gianmarco ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HYPERMEDIA; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; PATIENT; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; READING; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; HYPERMEDIA; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; SEMANTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 47149117772     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enp004     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Berch, D., Krikorian, R., & Huha, E. (1998). The Corsi Block-Tapping task: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Brain and Cognition, 38, 317-338.
2. Blankenberger, S., & Hahn, K. (1991). Effects of icon-design on human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 363-377.
3. Brumby, D. P, & Howes, A. (in press). Strategies for guiding interactive search: An empirical investigation into the consequences of label relevance for assessment and selection. Human-Computer Interaction.
4. Chincotta, M., & Chincotta, D. (1996). Digit span, articulatory suppression and the deaf. A study of the Honk Kong Chinese. American Annals of the Deaf 141, 252-257.
5. Dell'Acqua, R., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32 588-615.
6. Dillon, A., & Song, M. (1997). An empirical comparison of the usability for novice and expert searchers of a textual and a graphic interface to an art-resource database. Journal of Digital Information, 1(1). Retrieved December 1, 2006, from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1299/.
7. Dunn, L., Stella, G., Pizzioli, C., & Tressoldi, P. (2000). Peabody: Test di vocabolario recettivo: Manuale. Torino, Italy: Omega.
8. Fabbretti, D., Volterra, V, & Pontecorvo, C. (1998). Written language abilities in Deaf Italians. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 231-244.
9. Fajardo, I. (2005). Cognitive accesibility to hypertext systems. The role of verbal and visuospatial abilities of deaf and hearing users in information retrieval. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
10. Fajardo, I., Cañas, J. J., Salmerón, L., & Abascal, J. (2006). Improving deaf users' accessibility in hypertext information retrieval: Are graphical interfaces useful for them? Behaviour and Information Technology, 25, 455-467.
11. Flaherty, M. (2000). Memory in the deaf: A cross cultural study in English and Japanese. American Annals of the Deaf 145, 237-244.
12. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mayberry, R. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 221-228.
13. Harris, M., & Moreno, C. (2004). Deaf children's use of phonological coding: Evidence from reading, spelling, and working memory. Journal of Deaf Studies Deaf Education, 9, 253-268.
14. Head, M., Archer, N., & Yuan, Y. (2000). World Wide Web navigation aid. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 301-330.
15. Job, R., Rumiati, R., & Lotto, L. (1992). The picture superiority effect in categorization: Visual or semantic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1019-1028.
16. Kelly, L. (1996). The interaction of syntactic competence and vocabulary during reading by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 75-90.
17. Kessels, R., van Zandvoort, M., Postma, A., Kappelle, L., & de Haan, E. (2000). The Corsi Block-Tapping task: Standardization and normative data. Applied Neuropsychology, 7, 252-258.
18. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M. H., & Polson, P. G. A. (2000). Comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to Web usability analysis. In S. McDonald, Y. Waern, & G. Cockton (Eds.), People and computers XIV - Usability or else! (pp. 357-373). London: Springer.
19. Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. (1998). Web page design: Implication of memory, structure, and scent for information retrieval. In C.-M. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz, & J. Karat (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI'98 Human Factors in Computing Systems Structure (pp. 25-32). New York: ACM Press.
20. Lee, M. J., & Tedder, M. C. (2004). Introducing expanding hypertext based on working memory capacity and the feeling of disorientation: Tailored communication through effective hypertext design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 171-195.
21. Loeterman, M., Paul, P. V., & Donahue, S. (2002). Reading and deaf children. Reading Online, 5(6). Retrieved March 5, 2007, from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/loeterman/index.html.
22. Logan, K., Maybery, M., & Fletcher, J. (1996). The short-term memory of profoundly deaf people for words, signs and abstract spatial stimuli. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 105-119.
23. Lotto, L., Job, R., & Rumiati, R. (1999). Visual effects in picture and word categorization. Memory and Cognition, 27, 674-684.
24. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., McEvoy, C., & Masteller, A. (2004). Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. American Annals of the Deaf 149, 51-61.
25. Marschark, M., De Beni, R., Polazzo, M. G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Deaf and hearing-impaired adolescents' memory for concrete and abstract prose: Effects of relational and distinctive information. American Annals of the Deaf 138, 31-39.
26. Marschark, M., & Everhart, V. (1999). Problem-solving by deaf and hearing students: Twenty questions. Deafness and Education International, 1(2), 65-82.
27. Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in learning to read: The special case of deaf children. In J. Oakhill & C. Cornoldi (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension disabilities: Processes and intervention (pp. 279-300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Modler, R. (1976). Handbook ofpictorical symbols. 3250 examples from international sources. New York: Dover Publication.
29. Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can't hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 9-31.
30. Namatame, M., & Kitajima, M. (2005, July). Differences in Web interaction styles of hard-of-hearing and hearing persons. Paper presented at the HCI International Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada.
31. Namatame, M., Nishizaki, Y., & Kitajima, M. (2007, July). Improving usability of Web pages for hard-of-hearing persons: An investigation of the utility of pictograms. Poster session presented at the HCI International Conference, Beijing, China.
32. Nelson, D. L., Reed, U. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Picture superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 523-528.
33. Norman, K. (1991). The psychology of menu selection: Designing cognitive control of the human/computer interface. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Paivio, A. (1977). Images, propositions and knowledge. In J. M. Nicholas (Ed.), Images, perception and knowledge (pp. 47-71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
35. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual-coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
37. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1991). Manual for the Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London: Lewis.
38. Salmerón, L., Cañas, J. J., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Are expert users always better searchers? Interaction of expertise and semantic grouping in hypertext search tasks. Behaviour and Information Technology, 24 471-475.
39. Smith, P. (1996). Towards a practical measure of hypertext usability. Interacting with Computer, 8, 365-381.
40. Snodgrass, J. G., & McCullough, B. (1986). The role of visual similarity in picture categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 147-154.
41. Vicente, K. J., Hayes, B. C., & Williges, R. C. (1987). Individual differences in computer-based information retrieval. In L. S. Mark, J. S. Warm, & R. L. Huston (Eds.), Ergonomics and human factors (pp. 225 229). New York: Springer.
42. Wauters, L. N., van Bon, W. H., Tellings, A. E., & van Leeuwe, J. F. (2006). In search of factors in deaf and hearing children's reading comprehension. American Annals of the Deaf 151, 371-380.
43. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler adult intelligence scale revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
44. Wilson, M., Bettger, J. G., Niculae, I., & Klima, E. S. (1997). Working memory for sign language: A window into the architecture of the working memory system. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 121-130.