Changes in Mitral Regurgitation After Replacement of the Stenotic Aortic Valve

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 56-62

  Waisbren, Emily C ^a   Stevens, Louis Mathieu ^a   Avery, Edwin G ^a   Picard, Michael H ^a   Vlahakes, Gus J ^a   Agnihotri, Arvind K ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART SURGERY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; COHORT STUDIES; COMORBIDITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 47049093777     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Christenson J.T., Jordan B., Bloch A., and Schmuziger M. Should a regurgitant mitral valve be replaced simultaneously with a stenotic aortic valve?. Texas Heart Inst J 27 (2000) 350-355
2. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Specifications for vendors and PGS sites-version 2.52.1. http://www.ctsnet.org/file/rptDataSpecifications252_1_ForVendorsPGS.pdf Accessed: April 9, 2004.
3. Heinle S.K., Hall S.A., Brickner M.E., Willett D.L., and Grayburn P.A. Comparison of vena contracta width by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography with quantitative Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 81 (1998) 175-179
4. Zoghbi W.A., Enriquez-Sarano M., Foster E., et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 (2003) 777-802
5. Lang R.M., Bierig M., Devereux R.B., et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18 (2005) 1440-1463
6. Capps S.B., Elkins R.C., and Fronk D.M. Body surface area as a predictor of aortic and pulmonary valve diameter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119 (2000) 975-982
7. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
8. Blackstone E.H., Cosgrove D.M., Jamieson W.R., et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126 (2003) 783-796
9. Medalion B., Blackstone E.H., Lytle B.W., White J., Arnold J.H., and Cosgrove D.M. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119 (2000) 963-974
10. Rosenhek R., Binder T., Maurer G., and Baumgartner H. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 (2003) 1116-1127
11. Hedeker D. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model. Statist Med 22 (2003) 1433-1446
12. Arom K.V., Nicoloff D.M., Kersten T.E., Northrup III W.F., Lindsay W.G., and Emery R.W. Ten-year follow-up study of patients who had double valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 98 (1989) 1008-1015
13. Adams P.B., and Otto C.M. Lack of improvement in coexisting mitral regurgitation after relief of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 66 (1990) 105-107
14. Brasch A.V., Khan S.S., DeRobertis M.A., Kong J.H., Chiu J., and Siegel R.J. Change in mitral regurgitation severity after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 85 (2000) 1271-1274
15. Moazami N., Diodato M.D., Moon M.R., et al. Does functional mitral regurgitation improve with isolated aortic valve replacement?. J Cardiac Surg 19 (2004) 444-448
16. Ruel M., Kapila V., Price J., Kulik A., Burwash I.G., and Mesana T.G. Natural history and predictors of outcome in patients with concomitant functional mitral regurgitation at the time of aortic valve replacement. Circulation 114 (2006) I541-I546
17. Absil B., Dagenais F., Mathieu P., et al. Does moderate mitral regurgitation impact early or mid-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24 (2003) 217-222
18. Harris K.M., Malenka D.J., Haney M.F., et al. Improvement in mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 80 (1997) 741-745
19. Tunick P.A., Gindea A., and Kronzon I. Effect of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis on severity of mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 65 (1990) 1219-1221
20. Eynden F.V., Bouchard D., El-Hamamsy I., et al. Effect of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis on severity of mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 83 (2007) 1279-1284
21. Wong D.R., Agnihotri A.K., Hung J.W., et al. Long-term survival after surgical revascularization for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 80 (2005) 570-577
22. Reed D., Abbott R.D., Smucker M.L., and Kaul S. Prediction of outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation. The importance of left atrial size. Circulation 84 (1991) 23-34
23. Christakis G.T., Buth K.J., Goldman B.S., et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg 66 (1998) 1198-1203
24. Bridges C.R., O'Brien S.M., Cleveland J.C., et al. Association between indices of prosthesis internal orifice size and operative mortality after isolated aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133 (2007) 1012-1021
25. Harpole Jr. D.H., Gall Jr. S.A., Wolfe W.G., Rankin J.S., and Jones R.H. Effects of valve replacement on ventricular mechanics in mitral regurgitation and aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996) 756-761
26. Roberts B.J., and Grayburn P.A. Color flow imaging of the vena contracta in mitral regurgitation: technical considerations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 (2003) 1002-1006