Evidence-Based Practices With Students Who Are Deaf

Communication Disorders Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 49-52

  Luckner, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47049092339     PISSN: 15257401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/15257401060280010801     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2002). Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence: Summary, evidence report/technology assessment Number 47 (AHRQ Publication No. 02-E015). Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/strengthsum.htm.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders (Position statement). Retrieved March 28, 2006, from http//www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
3. Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices. Washington, DC: Thomas B Fordham Foundation.
4. Easterbrooks, S.R. (2005). Review of literacy in literacy development and instruction in students who are deaf and hard of hearing. Retrieved February 11, 2005, from http://www.deafed.net/DeafedForums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1964.
5. Ferrell, K.A., Luckner, J.L., & Muir, S. (2004). Can children with low-incidence disabilities be left behind? Counterpoint, Spring, 10.
6. Luckner, J.L. (2004). Building general education environments that maximize student success. In R. Rittenhouse (Ed.), Deaf education at the dawn of the 21st century: Old challenges, new directions (pp. 105—149). Hillsboro, OR: Butte Publications.
7. Luckner, J.L., Sebald, A.M., Cooney, J., Young, J., & Muir, S.G. (2005/2006). An examination of the evidence-based literacy research in deaf education. American Annals of the Deaf, 150, 443—456.
8. Neuman, S. B., & McCormick, S. (Eds.). (1995). Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
10. Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Research in special education scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137—148.
11. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. (2001). Levels of evidence and grades for recommendations. Oxford, UK: Author. Retrieved February 8, 2005, from http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp.
12. Robey, R. (2004, April 13). Levels of evidence. The ASHA Leader, p. 5.
13. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68—78.
14. Schirmer, B.R., & McGough, S.M. (2005). Teaching reading to children who are deaf: Do the conclusions of the National Reading Panel apply? Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 83—117.
15. Slavin, R.E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15—21.
16. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Washington, DC: Author.
17. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 16, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2002/index.html.
18. Valentine, J.C., & Cooper, H. (2004). What works clearinghouse study design and implementation assessment device (Version 1.1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.