An examination of the evidence-based literacy research in deaf education

American Annals of the Deaf

Volumn 150, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 443-456

  Luckner, John L ^a   Sebald, Ann M ^b   Cooney, John ^a   Young III, John ^a   Muir, Sheryl Goodwin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

^b National Center on Low Incidence Disabilities   (United States)

^c Colorado Department of Education ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645656347     PISSN: 0002726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2006.0008     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Adams, M. J. (1991). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allen, T. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974 and 1983. In A. Schildroth & M. Karchmer (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161-206). San Diego, CA: Little, Brown.
3. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Andrews, J. F., & Mason, J. M. (1991). Strategy usage among deaf and hearing readers. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 536-545.
5. Baumann, J. F., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1991). Research on vocabulary instruction: Ode to Voltaire. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Handbook on research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 604-632). New York: Macmillan.
6. Berkman, N. D., DeWalt, D. A., Pignone, M. P., Sheridan, S. L., Lohr, K. N., Lux, L., Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., & Bonito, A. J. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes (Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
7. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207.
8. Cambra, C. (1994). An instructional program approach to improve hearing-impaired adolescents' narratives: A pilot study. Volta Review, 96(3), 237-246.
9. Center for Assessment and Demographic Studies. (1991). Stanford Achievement Test, eighth edition: Hearing-impaired norms booklet. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, Gallaudet Research Institute.
10. Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.) Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace.
11. Chatterji, M. (2004). Evidence on "what works": An argument for extended-term mixed-method (ETMM) evaluation designs. Educational Researcher, 33(9), 3-13.
12. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
13. Cramer, S. C., & Ellis, W. (Eds.). (1996). Learning disabilities: Lifelong issues. Baltimore: Brookes.
14. DeVilliers, P. A., & Pomerantz, S. B. (1992). Hearing impaired students learning new words from written context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 409-431.
15. Dew, D. (Ed.). (1999). Serving individuals who are low-functioning deaf: Report of the Twenty-fifth Institute on Rehabilitation Issues. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
16. Easterbrooks, S. R. (2005, January). Review of literacy in literacy development and instruction in students who are deaf and hard of hearing. Retrieved February 11, 2005, from http://www.deafed.net/DeafedForums/Show Post.aspx?PostID=1964
17. Erickson, M. E. (1987). Deaf readers reading beyond the literal. American Annals of the Deaf, 132, 291-294.
18. Frank, K., Karst, R., & Boles, C. (1989). After graduation: The quest for employment by disabled college graduates. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 20, 3-7.
19. Garan, E. M. (2002). Resisting reading mandates. How to triumph with the truth. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. Geers, A., & Moog, J. (1989). Factors predictive of the development of literacy in profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents. Volta Review, 91(2), 69-86.
21. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149-164.
22. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
23. Glass, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
24. Glass, G. V,. McGraw, G., & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 222-229.
26. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
28. Krashen, S. (2005). Is in-school free reading good for children? Why the National Reading Panel report is (still) wrong. Retrieved April 22, 2005, from http://www.sdkrashen .com/articles/in-school%20FVR/all.html
29. Lederberg, A. R., & Spencer, P. E. (2001). Vocabulary development of deaf and hard of hearing children. In M. D. Clark, M. Marschark, & M. Karchmer (Eds.). Context, cognition, and deafness (pp. 88-112). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
30. Levin, J. R., O'Donnell, A. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2003). Educational/psychological intervention research. In W. Reynold & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology (pp. 557-581). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31. Luckner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the transition of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
32. Lyon, R. (2001). How do children learn to read? Retrieved September 27, 2004, from www.readingrockets.org/article.php?ID=101
33. Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in learning to read: The special case (?) of deaf children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 279-300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore: Brookes.
35. The national agenda: Moving forward on achieving educational equality for deaf and hard of hearing students. (2005). Austin, TX: Author.
36. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user-friendly guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
37. National Institute for Literacy. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Retrieved February 15, 2004, from http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/PFRbooklet
38. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 1201-1226, 115 Stat. 425 (2001).
41. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137-148.
42. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2001). Levels of evidence and grades for recommendations. Retrieved February 8, 2005, from http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp
43. Paul, P. V. (1998). Literacy and deafness: The development of reading, writing, and literate thought. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44. Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 185-197.
45. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1, 331-340.
46. Schirmer, B. R., Bailey, J., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1999). Using a written assessment rubric for writing development of children who are deaf. Exceptional Children, 65(3), 383-397.
47. Schirmer, B. R., & McGough, S. M. (2005). Teaching reading to children who are deaf: Do the conclusions of the National Reading Panel apply? Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 83-117.
48. Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf.
49. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practices and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
50. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Arlington, VA: Rand.
51. Stewart, D. A., & Kluwin, T. N. (2001). Teaching deaf and hard of hearing students: Content, strategies, and curriculum. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Strassman, B. K. (1992). Deaf adolescents' metacognitive knowledge about school-related reading. American Annals of the Deaf, 137(4), 326-330.
53. Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved January 9, 2005, from http://worklearning.com/effect_sizes.htm
54. Thompson, B., Diamond, K. E., McWilliam, R., Snyder, P., & Snyder, S. W (2004). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 181-194.
55. Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, ninth edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337-348.
56. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user-friendly guide. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
57. Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2004). What Works Clearinghouse study design and implementation assessment device (Version 1.1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
58. Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations (Task Force on Statistical Inference). American Psychologist, 54(8), 594-604.