Critical issues in developing the teacher corps for english learners

Preparing Quality Educators for English Language Learners: Research, Policies, and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 99-120

  Gándara, Patricia ^a   Maxwell Jolly, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46949100836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617347     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Blanton, L. L. (1999). Classroom instruction and language minority students: On teaching to "smarter" readers and writers. In L. Harklau, K. M. Losey, & M. Siegal (Eds.), Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to US educated learners of ESL (pp. 119-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Stecher, B. M. (2002). Class size reduction in California: Findings from 1999-00 and 2000-01. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
3. Cahnmann, M. S., & Hornberger, N. (2000). Understanding what counts: Issues of language, culture, and power in mathematics instruction and assessment. Educators for Urban Minorities, 1, 39-52.
4. California Department of Education. (1999). Education Demographics Office, Spring 1999 Language Census. Available online at http://www.cde.ca.gov
5. California Department of Education. (2003). Language Census, 2003. Available online at http://www.cde.ca.gov
6. Crawford, J. (1998). Language politics in the United States: The paradox of bilingual education. In C. Ovando & P. McLaren (Eds.), The politics of multiculturalism and bilingual education: Students and teachers caught in the cross-fire. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Crawford, J. (1999). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory, & practice. Los Angeles, CA: Bilingual Educational Services.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Access to quality teaching: An analysis of inequality in California's public schools. UCLA Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access. Available online at http://www.ucla-idea.org
9. Economist. Available online at http://economist.com/cities/displaystory.efm?storyid=2609395
10. Educational Testing Service, ETS. (2003). The no child left behind act: A special report. Available online at http://www.ets.org/aboutets/child/index.html
11. Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., Garcia, E., Asato, J., Gutierrez, K., Stritikus, T., & Curry, J. (2000). The effects of Proposition 227 on the instruction of English learners: Year one implementation. University of California, Santa Barbara: Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
12. Gándara, P., Rumberger, R., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Callahan, R. (2003). The inequitable treatment of English learners in California's public schools, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 16, Available online at http://www.asu.edu/epaa
13. Garcia, E. E. (1992). Teachers for language minority students: Evaluating professional standards. Focus on evaluation and measurement. Vols. 1 and 2. Proceedings of the National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues (Washington, DC, September 4-6, 1991).
14. Garcia, E. E. (1996). Preparing instructional professionals for linguistically and culturally diverse students. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 802-813). New York: Simon & Schuster.
15. Haberman, M. (1996). Selecting and preparing culturally competent teachers for urban schools. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 747-760). New York: Simon & Schuster.
16. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2001). Why public schools lose teachers. Working paper 8559. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. Harvey, W. (2002). Minorities in higher education, 2001-2002, 19th Annual Status Report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
18. Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well qualified teachers can close the gap, Thinking K-16, 3(2), 1-8.
19. Hayes, K., & Salazar, J. J. (2001). Evaluation of the structured English immersion program. Final Report: Year 1. Program Evaluation Branch, Los Angeles City Schools.
20. Hayes, K., Salazar, J., & Vukovic, E. (2002). Evaluation of the structured English immersion program. Final Report: Year 2. Program Evaluation Branch, Los Angeles City Schools.
21. Herman, J., Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. (2003). Preparing teachers to teach English learners in California: CPDI year 2 evaluation report. CRESST, University of California, Los Angeles.
22. Herman, J., Goldschmidt, P., & Swigert, S. (2003). Evaluation of the primary and secondary English language arts California professional development institutes survey responses to teacher practices and institute evaluation. CRESST, University of California, Los Angeles.
23. Huddy, L., & Sears, D. (1990). Qualified public support for bilingual education: Some policy implications. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 508, 119-134.
24. Krashen, S. (1996). Surveys of opinions on bilingual education: Some current issues. Bilingual Research Journal, 20, 411-431.
25. Loeb, S., & Page, M. E. (2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 393-408.
26. Maxwell-Jolly, J. (2001). Exit, voice and loyalty: Bilingual teacher response to mandated reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.
27. Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Gándara, P. (2002). A quest for quality: Providing qualified teachers for California's English learners. In Z. Beycont (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
28. Milk, R., Mercado, C., & Sapiens, A. (1992). Rethinking the education of teachers of language minority children: Developing reflective teachers for changing schools. NCBE Focus: Occasional papers in bilingual education. Number 6, Summer, 1992. (online serial). http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu
29. Murnane, R., Singer, J., Willett, J., Kemple, J., & Olsen, R. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Office of the President University of California. (2002). Evaluation of California Professional Development Institutes. Oakland, CA: UCOP.
31. Olsen, L. (1998). The Unz/Tuchman "English for Children" initiative: A new attack on immigrant children and the schools. Multicultural Education, 5 (3), 11-13.
32. Olsen, L., Chang, H., De la Rosa Salazar, D., Leong, C., McCall-Perez, Z., McClain, G., & Raffel, L. (1994). The unfinished journey: Restructuring schools in a diverse society, Oakland, CA: California Tomorrow.
33. Parrish, T. B., Linquanti, R., Merickel, A., Quick, H. E., Laird, J., & Esra, P. (2002). Effects of the implementation of Proposition 227 on the education of English learners, K-12. Year two report. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
34. Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. Journal of the National Association of Bilingual Education, 2, 15-34.
35. Ruiz de Velasco, J., & Fix, M. (2000). Overlooked and underserved: Immigrant students in US secondary schools. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
36. Rumberger, R. W., & Gándara, P. (2000). The schooling of English learners. In E. Burr, G. Hayward, & M. Kirst (Eds.), Crucial issues in California education (pp. 23-44). Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education.
37. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1995). The Tennessee Value-Added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in educational assessment. In A. J. Shinkfield & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer.
38. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
39. Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. M., & Powell, J. P. (1998). An inventory of the status of teacher development in California. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
40. Solano-Flores, G., Trumball, E., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2002). Concurrent development of dual language assessments: An alternative to translating tests for linguistic minorities. International Journal of Testing, 2 (2), 107-129.
41. Solis, A. (1998). In Bilingual education. IDRA Focus. Intercultural Development Research Association, San Antonio, TX, IDRA Newsletter, 25, No. 1.
42. Tikunoff, W. J. (1983). An emerging description of successful bilingual instruction: Part I, SBIF study. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
43. Villarreal, A., & Solis, A. (1998). In Bilingual Education. IDRA Focus. Intercultural Development Research Association, San Antonio, TX. IDRA Newsletter, 25, No. 1.
44. Wong Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. Center for Applied Linguistics. Available online at www.ncbe.gwu.edu
45. Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M. L., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities, Volume I. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement of Limited English Proficient Students (OELA).
46. Zeichner, K. (1996). Educating teachers for cultural diversity. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 133-175). New York: Teachers College Press.