Multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment of patients with chronic low back pain: a prognostic model for its outcome

Clinical Journal of Pain

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 421-430

  Van Der Hulst, Marije ^a,b   Vollenbroek Hutten, Miriam M R ^a   Groothuis Oudshoorn, Karin G M ^a   Hermens, Hermie J ^a,c  

^a ROESSINGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Netherlands)

^b Rehabilitation Centre Het Roessingh   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chronic low back pain; Multidisciplinary treatment; Outcome; Prognostic model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; COMPENSATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; FEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; MENTAL COMPONENT SCALE; MULTIDIMENSIONAL PAIN INVENTORY DUTCH LANGUAGE VERSION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL AND MENTAL COMPONENT SUMMARY SCALE; PHYSICAL COMPONENT SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; ROLAND AND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN CLINIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN CLINICS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 46749156969     PISSN: 07498047     EISSN: 15365409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816719f5     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. van der Hulst M, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, IJzerman MJ. A systematic review of sociodemographic, physical, and psychological predictors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation or, back school treatment outcome in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine.2005;30:813-825.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. ICF checklist. [Online 2001]. Available at: http://www3.who.int/icf /icftemplate.cfm. Accessed August 1, 2002.
3. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain.1985;23:345-356.
4. Hasenbring M. Predictors of efficacy of treatment in chronic low back pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol.1998;11:553-558.
5. McCracken LM, Turk DC. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process. Spine.2002;27:2564-2573.
6. Feuerstein M, Beattie P. Biobehavioral factors affecting pain and disability in low back pain: mechanisms and assessment. Phys Ther.1995;75:267-280.
7. Gatchel RJ, Gardea MA. Psychosocial issues: their importance in predicting disability, response to treatment, and search for compensation. Neurol Clin.1999;17:149-166.
8. Hunter J. Medical history and chronic pain. Clin J Pain.2001;17: S20-S25.
9. Rohling ML, Binder LM, Langinrichsen-Rohling J. Money matters: a meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychol.1995;14:537-547.
10. Walsh NE, Dumitru D. The influence of compensation on recovery from low back pain. Occup Med.1988;3:109-121.
11. Teasell RW. Compensation and chronic pain. Clin J Pain.2001;17: S46-S64.
12. Lethem J, Slade PD, Troup JD, et al. Outline of a Fear-Avoidance Model of exaggerated pain perception-I. Behav Res Ther.1983;21: 401-408.
13. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain.2000;85: 317-332.
14. Mannion AF, Junge A, Taimela S, et al. Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy. Spine.2001;26:920-929.
15. Woby SR, Watson PJ, Roach NK, et al. Are changes in fearavoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and appraisals of control, predictive of changes in chronic low back pain and disability? Eur J Pain.2004;8:201-210.
16. Vlaeyen JW, Morley S. Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain: what works for whom? Clin J Pain.2005;21:1-8.
17. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, et al. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain.2004;107:77-85.
18. Altman DG, Lyman GH. Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat.1998;52:289- 303.
19. Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, Wever D, et al. Differences in outcome of a multidisciplinary treatment between subgroups of chronic low back pain patients defined using two multiaxial assessment instruments: the multidimensional pain inventory and lumbar dynamometry. Clin Rehabil.2004;18:566-579.
20. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials. A Practical Approach. Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1983.
21. Hirsch G, Beach G, Cooke C, et al. Relationship between performance on lumbar dynamometry and Waddell score in a population with low-back pain. Spine.1991;16:1039-1043.
22. Zachrisson Forsell M. The Swedish back school. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:112-114.
23. Fordyce WE, Roberts AH, Sternbach RA. The behavioral management of chronic pain: a response to critics. Pain.1985;22:113-125.
24. Altman DG. Relation between two continuous variables. In: Altman DG, ed. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1999:277-324.
25. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Cramer GD, et al. A comparison of outcome measures for use with back pain patients: results of a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.1993;16:67-73.
26. Lousberg R, Van Breukelen GJ, Groenman NH, et al. Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Dutch language version (MPI-DLV). Behav Res Ther.1999;37:167-182.
27. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data. J Consult Clin Psychol.1988;56:233-238.
28. Lousberg R. Chronic Pain, Multiaxial Diagnostics and Behavioral Mechanisms. Academic Dissertation. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Datawyse University Press; 1994.
29. Lousberg R, Groenman N, Schmidt A. Profile characteristics of the MPI-DLV clusters of pain patients. J Clin Psychol.1996;52: 161-167.
30. Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM. Symptom Checklist SCL-90: Handleiding bij een Multidimensionele Psychopathologie-indicator. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1986.
31. Bernstein IH, Jaremko ME, Hinkley BS. On the utility of the SCL- 90-R with low-back pain patients. Spine.1994;19:42-48.
32. Goubert L, Crombez G, Vlaeyen JWS, et al. De Tampa Schaal voor kinesiofobie: psychometrische karakteristieken en normering. Gedrag and Gezondheid.2000;28:54-63.
33. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol.2001; 28:431-438.
34. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine.1995;20:1899-1908; discussion 1909.
35. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine.1983;8:141-144.
36. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv.1976;6:393-415.
37. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra PU, et al. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement. Disabil Rehabil.2004;26:162-165.
38. Gommans IHB, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Validiteit en responsiviteit Nederlandstalige Roland Disability Questionnaire. Vragenlijst naar functionele status bij patië nten met lagerugpijn. Ned Tijdschr Fys.1997;2:28- 33.
39. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol.1998;51:1055-1068.
40. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care.1992;30: 473-483.
41. Essink Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ, et al. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care.1997;35:522-537.
42. van der Zee K, Sanderman R, Heyink J. De psychometrische kwaliteiten van de MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in een Nederlandse populatie. Tijdschr Soc Gez.1993;71:183-191.
43. van der Zee K, Sanderman R, Heyink JW, et al. Psychometric qualities of the Rand 36-item health survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med.1996;3:104-122.
44. Ware JE, Kosinski M. Norm-based scoring for physical & mental summary measures. In: Ware JE, Kosinski M, eds. SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. 2nd ed. Lincoln, Rhode Island: Quality Metric Inc; 2002:28-34.
45. Ware JE, Kosinski M. Reliability and statistical power. In: Ware JE, Kosinski M, eds. SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. 2nd ed. Lincoln, Rhode Island: Quality Metric Inc; 2002:36-44.
46. Ware JE, Kosinski M. Empirical validation. In: Ware JE, Kosinski M, eds. SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: AManual for Users of Version 1. 2nd ed. Lincoln, Rhode Island: Quality Metric Inc; 2002:45-55.
47. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn CGM. Flexible Multivariate Imputation by MICE. Leiden: TNO Preventie en Gezondheid, TNO/VGZ/PG 99.054; 1999.
48. van Buuren S, Brand JPL, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, et al. Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. Simulation study on the MICE algorithm. J Stat Comput Simulation.2006;76: 1049-1064.
49. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Non Response in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
50. Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol.2005;34: 215-220.
51. Talo S, Rytokoski U, Puukka P. Patient classification, a key to evaluate pain treatment: a psychological study in chronic low back pain patients. Spine.1992;17:998-1011.
52. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Haestrup C. Can it be predicted which patients with chronic low back pain should be offered tertiary rehabilitation in a functional restoration program? A search for demographic, socioeconomic, and physical predictors. Spine.1998;23:1775-1183; discussion 1783-1784.
53. Talo S, Puukka P, Rytokoski U, et al. Can treatment outcome of chronic low back pain be predicted? Psychological disease consequences clarifying the issue. Clin J Pain.1994;10:107-121.
54. Bergstrom G, Jensen IB, Bodin L, et al. The impact of psychologically different patient groups on outcome after a vocational rehabilitation program for long-term spinal pain patients. Pain.2001;93:229-237.
55. Gatchel RJ, Noe CE, Pulliam C, et al. A preliminary study of multidimensional pain inventory profile differences in predicting treatment outcome in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain.2002;18:139-143.
56. Voerman GE, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Sandsjö L, et al. Prognostic factors for the effect of two interventions for work-related neck-shoulder complaints: myofeedback training and ergonomic counseling. Appl Ergon.2008 Jan 16. [Epub ahead of print].
57. Palatino PB, Satchel RJ, Barnes D, et al. A psychosociomedical prediction model of response to treatment by chronically disabled workers with low-back pain. Spine.1989;14:956-961.
58. Fisher K, Johnston M. Emotional distress and control cognitions as mediators of the impact of chronic pain on disability. Br J Health Psychol.1998;3:225-236.
59. Goossens ME, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, et al. Treatment expectancy affects the outcome of cognitive-behavioral interventions in chronic pain. Clin J Pain.2005;21:18-26; discussion 69-72.
60. Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. A two-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil.2000;22:639-654.
61. McCracken LM, Gross RT, Eccleston C. Multimethod assessment of treatment process in chronic low back pain: comparison of reported pain-related anxiety with directly measured physical capacity. Behav Res Ther.2002;40:585-594.
62. Pfingsten M, Franz C, Hildebrandt J, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment program on chronic low back pain, part 3. Psychosocial aspects. Schmerz.1996;10:326-344.
63. Spinhoven P, Ter Kuile M, Kole-Snijders AM, et al. Catastrophizing and internal pain control as mediators of outcome in the multidisciplinary treatment of chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain.2004;8:211-219.
64. Altmaier EM, Russell DW, Kao CF, et al. Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. J Couns Psychol.1993;40:335-339.
65. Haazen IWCJ, Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, et al. Behavioral rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: searching for predictors of treatment outcome. J Rehabil Sci.1994;7:34-43.
66. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. J Consult Clin Psychol.1994;62:172-179.
67. Senn S. Baselines and covariate information. Statistical Issues in Drug Development. Chicester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Limited; 2002:95-109.