Predictors of efficacy in treatment of chronic low back pain

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 553-558

  Hasenbring, Monika ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031788617     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001503-199810000-00018     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Fordyce WE. Back pain in the workplace. Seattle: IASP Press; 1995.
2. Walsh K, Cruddas M, Coggon D. Low back pain in eight areas of britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46:227-230.
3. Bonica J. The nature of the problem. In: Management of low back pain. Carron H, McLaughlin R (editors). Boston, John Wright Publishing; 1982; pp. 1-15.
4. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H, Kishino ND, Keeley J, Mooney V. A prospective 2-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. JAMA 1987; 258:1763-1767.
5. Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Leibing E, Franz C, Saur P. Effectiveness of a multimodal treatment program for chronic low back pain. Pain 1997; 73:77-85.
6. Flor H, Fydrich T, Turk DC. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain 1992; 49:221-230.
7. Marshall WJS, Schorstein J. Factors affecting the results of surgery for prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. Scott Med J 1968; 13:38-42.
8. Kuperman S, Osmon D, Golden C, Blume H. Prediction of neurosurgical results by psychological evaluation. Percept Motor Skills 1979; 48:311-315.
9. Turner JA, Herron L, Weiner P. Utility of the MMPI pain assessment index in predicting outcome after lumbar surgery. J Clin Psychol 1986; 42:764-769.
10. Cairns D, Mooney V, Crane P. Spinal pain rehabilitation: inpatients and outpatient treatment results and development of predictors for outcome. Spine 1984; 9:91-95.
11. Hasenbring M, Marienfeld G, Kuhlendahl D, Soyka D. Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. A prospective invenstigation of biologic, psychologic and social predictors of therapy outcome. Spine 1994; 19:2759-2765.
12. Flores L, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB. Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care. Spine 1997; 22:1622-1633. This a systematic review of assessment methods that were used to objectify functional improvement after nonoperative care of low back pain patients, which considers physical, psychologic and socioeconomic data.
13. McCracken LM, Klock PA, Mingay DJ, Asbury JK, Sinclair DM. Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 14:292-299. This study involved the development of a standardized questionnaire for the reliable assessment of satisfaction with treatment. In a study with 50 patients, the authors found negative correlations between depression, number of physicians consulted and satisfaction.
14. Viikari-Juntura E, Takala EP, Riihimaki H, Malmivaara A, Martikainen R, Jappinen P. Standardized physical exmaination protocol for low back disorders: feasability of use and validity of symptoms and signs. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51:245-255. The authors describe the development of an interesting instrument for the standardized assessment of physical parameters in low back pain patients.
15. Williams RA, Pruitt SD, Doctor JN, Epping-Jordan JE, Wahlgren DR, Grant I, et al. The contribution of job satisfaction to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79:366-374. This is a prospective study of 82 male orthopedic outpatients with first-onset acute back pain and 2-and 6-months follow-up. Assessement of a set of medical, sociodemographic, psychological and work-related parameters pre and post-treatment were performed using standardized instruments. A well elaborated statistical analysis. Main independant predictors for recurrence of pain, disability and depression were orthopaedic findings and job satisfaction; the latter being positively correlated with objective type of work.
16. Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P, Jansen J. Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 1997; 22:990-1001. A prospective cohort study including 90 disabled CLBP patients admitted to an 8-week program of functional restoration and behavioral support using pre and post-treatment standardized tests. Independant predictors for return to work rate after 1 year were initial application for pension, poor expectation concerning back to work, job as truck driver and change in depression and disability rating during treatment. Main predictors for pain intensity were initial application for pension, time off work, trunk extension test and change in disability ratings. The study impressively demonstrated the predictive power of cognitive variables.
17. Ingemarsson AH, Nordholm L, Sivik T. Risk of long-term disability among patients with back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29:205-212. Two hundred and forty back pain patients patients were investigated pre and 1 year post primary care. Study criteria were 'number of sick-days' and change in sick-leave. Predictors were sick-days before intervention, somatisation, living with many children and family members, change in task at work due to pain, brothers or sisters with longstanding pain problems and sleep disturbance.
18. Waddell G, Main CJ. Assessment of severity in low back disorders. Spine 1984; 9:204-208.
19. Ackerman SJ, Steinberg EP, Bryan RN, BenDebba M, Long DM. Persistent low back pain in patients suspected of having herniated nucleus pulposus: radiologic predictors of functional outcome-implications for treatment selection. Radiology 1997; 20:815-822. A retrospective study of a large sample (1084 patients with CLBP and herniated nucleus pulposus). In patients with only abnormal advanced imaging results or clinical findings, therapy outcome was better in those who were operated on rather than conservatively treated. In patients with an unconfirmed diagnosis, treatment was no more successful than no treatment.
20. Lovely TJ, Rastogi P. The value of provocative facet blocking as a predictor of success in lumbar spine fusion. J Spinal Disord 1997; 10:512-517. This prospective study used success rate of facet blocking as an indication for fusion surgery in 91 CLBP patients. Twenty-eight patients had greater than 70% relief of pain for more than 6 h on three occasions. Twenty-three had 90% relief.
21. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 1995; 20:722-728.
22. Klenerman L, Slade PD, Stanley IM, Pennie B, Reilly JP, Atchison LE, et al. The prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in a general practice setting. Spine 1995; 20:478-484.
23. Dolce JJ, Crocker MF, Doleys DM. Prediction of outcome among chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther 1986; 24:313-319.
24. Strategier LD, Chwalisz K, Altmaier EM, Russell DW, Lehmann TR. Multidimensional assessment of chronic low back pain: predicting treatment outcomes. J Clin Psychol Med Sett 1997; 4:91-110.
25. Woertgen C, Holzschuh M, Rothoerl RD, Brawanski A. Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients. Eur Spine J 1997; 6:173-180. This prospective study found that preoperative duration of pain, duration of paresis and smoking were relevant predictors of therapy outcome as assessed by the Prolo scale.
26. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Street JH, Barlow W. Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteria. Spine 1996; 21:2900-2907.
27. Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Reid S, McFalane G, MacDonald L. Early physician notification of patient disability risk and clinical guidelines after low back injury: a randomized, controlled trial. Spine 1997; 22:2951-2958. This study demonstrates the implementation of a standardized disability questionnaire in primary care. Disability scores predicted return to work rate at 3 months follow-up. However, a subsequent randomized intervention study (control versus physician notification) revealed no difference in therapy success.
28. Hoogen van den HJM, Koes BW, Devillé W, Eijk van JTM, Bouter LM. The prognosis of low back pain in general practice. Spine 1997; 22:1515-1521. Three hundred and eighty-nine patients with specific or nonspecific low back pain were prospectively investigated over 1 year following an initial visit in general practice. Several potential predictors known from the literature (medical and work-related variables, a physician judgment of psychosocial problems) could not be confirmed. Predictors of relapse were physical therapy and history of surgeries. One shortcoming of this study was a possible selection bias as a result of the 40% attrition rate.
29. Hoogen van den HJM, Koes BW, Eijk van JT, Bouter LM, Deville W. On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow-up. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57:13-19.
30. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Diasability Index: psychmetric properties. Pain 1990; 40:171-182.
31. Dvorkin RH, Richlin DM, Handlin DS, Brand L. Predicting treatment response in depressed and nondepressed chronic pain patients. Pain 1986; 24:343-353.
32. DeGroot KI, Boeke S, van den Berge HJ, Duivenvorrdern HJ, Bonke B, Passchier J. The influence of psychological variables on postoperative anxiety and physical complaints in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Pain 1997; 69:19-25. One hundered and twenty-six patients undergoing lumbar surgery were investigated pre-and postoperatively during hospitalization. Preoperative anxiety and leg pain predicted postoperative anxiety after controlling for influence of age, gender and medical variables. Preoperative anxiety and fatigue predicted idependantly postoperative physical complaints. Coping behavior (blunting versus monitoring) revealed no predictive power. All assessments were carried out using standardized, reliable instruments.
33. Fouquet B, Goupille P, Jeannou J, Etienne T, Chalumeau F, Valat JP. Influence of psychological factors on the response to chlomipramine in hospitalized chronic low back pain patients. Preliminary data from a psychometric study. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997; 64:804-808. Twenty-three patients with lower scores on MMPI scales (hypochondria, hysteria and depression) showed more improvement (reduction of pain) after 30 days with chlomipramine than nondepressive patients. However, the statistical analysis needs improvement.
34. Hasenbring M, Ovaskainen P, Soyka D. A classification of pain coping patterns based on an avoidance-endurance model of chronification: aspects of concurrent and prospective validity. Unpublished data.
35. Wahlgren DR, Atkinson JH, Epping-Jordan JE, Williams RA, Pruitt SD, Klapow JC, et al. One-year follow-up of first onset low back pain. Pain 1997; 73:213-221.
36. Sandstrom J, Essbjornsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation: the significance of the patients' own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986; 18:29-33.
37. Haerkaepaeae K, Jaervikoski A, Estlander AM. Health optimism and control beliefs as predictors for treatment outcome of a multimodal back treatment program. Psychol Health 1996; 12:123-134.
38. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustments. Pain 1983; 17:33-44.
39. Hasenbring M. Das Kieler Schmerz-Inventar. Bern: Huber Verlag; 1994.
40. Polatin PB, Cox B, Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG. A prospective study of Waddell signs in patients with chronic low back pain. When they may not be preditctive. Spine 1997; 22:1618-1621. This is a prospective cohort treatment study with 50 severe disabled CLBP patients undergoing a multidisciplinary functional restoration program. Waddell's nonorganic signs test revealed no predictive power using the criteria return to work, re-injury rate, health utilization and subsequent surgery. The authors argue that initial scores may be not predictive if nonorganic signs change during treatment.
41. Karas R, McIntosh G, Hall H, Wilson I, Melles T. The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1997; 77:354-360. One hundred and twenty-six mildly disabled low back pain patients previous outpatient physical therapy were studied. Follow-up was carried out by telephone interview at 6 months to assess work status. Patients' responses to repetitive movements (centralization) and Waddell scores were independant predictors.
42. Maruta T, Goldman S, Chan CW, Ilstrup DM, Kunselman AR, Colligan RC. Waddell's nonorganic signs and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory profiles in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1997; 22:72-75. The authors investigated concurrent validity for Waddell's nonorganic signs using MMPI. The results of former studies were not fully replicated.
43. Feuerstein M, Thebarge RW. Perceptions of disability and occupational stress as discriminators of work disability in patients with chronic pain. J Occup Rehabil 1991; 1:185-195.
44. Fishbain DA, Cutler RB, Rosomoff HL, Khalil T, Steele-Rosomoff R. Impact of chronic pain patients' job perception variables on actual return to work. Clin J Pain 1997; 13:197-206. One hundred and twenty-eight currently employed chronic pain patients undergoing a multidisciplinary treatment program were investigated before treatment and seven times at follow-up until 30 months after treatment. This study used an elaborated questionnaire assessing 68 possible job complaints regarding physical, mental and psychological stressors. At 1-month follow-up, 79% of the patients were correctly classified by the predictors 'intent to return to work', education and several physical and psychological job stressors. The 30-month follow-up was predicted by 'intent', job stress, age, gender and education.
45. Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Jayson MIV, Silman AJ. Psychosocial factors in the workplace - do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Spine 1997; 22:1137-1142. The same population as that enroled in the Macfarlane study [51]. Predictors of occurence of low back pain until 12-month follow-up were perceived inadequacy of income in men, conflicts with colleagues in women, dissatisfaction with work and social class. Patients with perceived inadequacy of income and of lower social class showed an enhanced consulting behavior.
46. Tan V, Cheattle MD, Mackin S, Moberg PJ, Esterhai JL Jr. Goal setting as a predictor of return to work in a population of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. Int J Neurosci 1997; 92:161-170. Fifty-nine chronic pain patients undergoing universitary pain management were prospectively studied pre and 18 months post. The pre-treatment goal to return to work was the best predictor for return to work at follow-up in addition to age, marital status, education and time off work. Gender and compensation status were not predictive.
47. Blake C, Garrett M. Impact of litigation on quality of life outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci 1997; 166:124-126. Twenty CLBP patients underwent a multidisciplinary pain management program including exercises and behavioral interventions. Patients with ongoing litigation (n=11) did not a show a quality of life improvement (SIP) despite significant improvements in physical fitness and pain.
48. Vaccaro AR, Ring D, Scuderi G, Cohen DS, Garfin SR. Predictors of outcome in patients with chronic back pain and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine 1997; 22:2030-2034. This is a retrospective study with a small sample of 24 patients with specific CLBP (spondylolisthesis). Compensation involvement was confirmed as a main risk factor leading to poor surgical results.
49. Rainville J, Sobel JB, Hartigan C, Wright A. The effect of compensation involvement on the reporting of pain and disability by patients referred for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. Spine 1997; 22:2016-2024. This ia a prospective cohort study of 192 CLBP patients undergoing a spine rehabilitation program. Ninety-six patients with compensation claims had enhanced pain, depression and disability at baseline. Among 85 patients who completed the program, compensation patients showed a similar length of treatment and similar physical fitness after treatment. Despite improved depression and disability at follow-up, they showed more pain than the noncompensation group.
50. Andersson GBJ. Quantitative studies of back loads in lifting. Spine 1976; 1:178-185.
51. Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Papageorgiou AC, Crogt PR, Jayson MJ, Silman AJ. Employment and physical work activities as predictors of future low back pain. Spine 1997; 22:1143-1149. A population-based longitudinal study in England. The study comprised 1412 people free of low back pain with a 12-month follow-up. The rate of LBP in the follow-up period was 35%. Main predictors were jobs that involved lifting/pulling/pushing objects of at least 25 lbs or prolonged periods of standing/walking. However, no relationship between years of exposure to these risk factors and magnitude of risk was observed.
52. Burton AK, Erg E. Back injury and work loss. Biomechanical and psychosocial influences. Spine 1997; 22:2575-2580.
53. Valat JP, Goupille P, Védere V. Low back pain: risk factors for chronicity. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997; 64:189-194.