New indicators linking patenting and business R&D expenditure

Scientometrics

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 201-224

  Lombardo, Luciano ^a,b  

^a Association for Research between Italy and Australasia (ARIA Canberra)   (Australia)

^b ANU 0200 ACT   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46749155798     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1631-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Branstetter, L., Yoshiaki, O. (2005), Is academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? Evidence from patent citations, NBER Working Paper No. 11561 issued in August.
2. Bryant, K., Lombardo, L., Healy, M., Bopage, L., Hartshorn, S. (1996), Australian Business Innovation: A Strategic Analysis, Canberra: AGPS, see Overview and Chapter 4.
3. Bryant, K., Lombardo, L. (2001). Broad level indicators of national systems of science and innovation: A new approach, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informatrics, Vol. 1, Sydney, Australia, 75-88.
4. Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F. (1980), 'Linkage between basic research literature and patents', Research Management, 13(2): 30-35.
5. Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., Soete, L. (1990), The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pages 44-51.
6. Griliches, Z. (1984), R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Griliches, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 18: 1661-1707.
8. Hofmeister, T. (2002), The Bayh-Dole effect on licensing government-funded technology, Education, 3(4).
9. Khan, M., Dernis, H. (2005), Impact of patent Cooperation Treaty data on EPO patent statistics and improving the timeliness of EPO indicators, STI Working Paper 2005/2, OECD.
10. Kim, J., Marschke, G. (2004), Accounting for the recent surge in U.S. patenting: changes in R&D expenditures, patent yields, and the high tech sector, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13: 543-558.
11. Kortum, S., Lerner, J. (1999), What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Research Policy, 28(1): 1-22.
12. Lombardo, L., Sasanelli, N. (2005), Preliminary studies on S&T collaboration between Italy and Australia in the context of Europe, US, and Japan.
13. OECD (1994), Using Patent Data as S&T Indicators (Patent Manual), Paris.
14. OECD (1995), Main Science and Technology Indicators, Paris: OECD.
15. OECD (2004), Main Science and Technology Indicators, Paris: OECD.
16. Patel, P., Pavitt, K. (1994), National innovation systems: Why they are important and how they might be measured, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3: 77-95.
17. Pavitt, K. (1985), Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems, Scientometrics, 7(1-2) 77-99.
18. Pinson, M. (1989), Patents Statistics as Indicators of the Creation and Dissemination of Technology since the Introduction of the two International Conventions: EPC and PCT, OECD (unpublished paper, 30 October).
19. Simmons, E., S. (2005), Trends disrupted-patent information in an era of change, World Patent Information, 27: 292-301.
20. Soete, L. (1987), The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered, Research Policy, 18: 101-130.
21. Soete, L., Wyatt, S. M. E. (1983), The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable S&T output indicator, Scientometrics, 5(1) 31-54.
22. WIPO (1998), WIPO Industrial Property Statistics 1998, available from URL: http://www.wipo.org/ipstats/en