Trends disrupted - Patent information in an era of change

World Patent Information

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 292-301

  Simmons, Edlyn S ^a  

^a The P and G US Business Services Co   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification systems; Corporate demergers; Corporate mergers; Disrupted trends; India; International treaties; National laws; Patent analysis; Patent trends; Patenting policies; USA

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944442486     PISSN: 01722190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wpi.2005.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. P. Ganguli Patents and patent information in 1979 and 2004: A perspective from India World Patent Inform 26 1 2004 61-62
2. P. Ganguli Intellectual property rights in transition World Patent Inform 20 3-4 1988 171-180
3. Derwent Guide to Patent Expiries. 9th ed., London: Thomson Derwent; 2004.
4. http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/convention/index.html.
5. http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm.
6. http://www.patentoffice.nic.in/.
7. Patent Mailbox Opens, Pfizer is top applicant. Global News Wire - Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. Financial Express; The Indian Express Online Media Ltd; 20 March 2005.
8. India Adopts Patent Law Covering Pharmaceuticals. The New York Times. 24 March 2005.
9. USPTO Patent Technology Monitoring Division. US Patent Activity Calendar Years 1790 to the Present Table of Annual US Patent Activity Since 1790. Available from .
10. Data obtained by searching the IFI CLAIMS US Patents database.
11. US General Accounting Office. GAO-04-603 Report to Congressional Committees: Patents: Information about the Publication Provisions of the American Inventors Protection Act (May, 2004). Available from .
12. P. Hingley M. Nicolas Methods of forecasting numbers of patent applications at the European Patent Office World Patent Inform 26 2004 191-204
13. http://www.na.cognis.com/northamerica/nacognis.html.
14. Simmons ES. Competitive Intelligence from patents - volatile: Handle with care. In: Collier H, editor. Proceedings of the 1995 international chemical information conference, Nimes France, 23-25 October 1995. p. 89-100; republished in J Assoc Global Strategic Inform1995;4(3):124-33.
15. Henkel v. Lloyds of London, et al. Cal. State Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 3, B134742 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC155209). Available from: .
16. J.L. Bower C.M. Christensen Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave Harvard Business Rev 73 1 1995 43 11p
17. R.A. Bleeker L.M. Troilo D.P. Ciminello Patenting nanotechnology Mater Today 7 2 2004 44-48
18. http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/biochempharm/crossref.htm.