Mitigation of seismic responses on building structures using MR dampers with Lyapunov-based control

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 604-621

  Ha, Q P ^a   Kwok, N M ^a   Nguyen, M T ^a   Li, J ^a   Samali, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Lyapunov based control; MR damper; Seismic response; Semi active control

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; EARTHQUAKES; LATTICE VIBRATIONS; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

BUILDING MODELLING; BUILDING STRUCTURES; DIFFERENTIAL-MODE; DIRECT CONTROL; FORCE-VELOCITY; HUMAN LIVES; INDUCED VIBRATIONS; LOW-POWER CONSUMPTION; LYAPUNOV BASED CONTROL; LYAPUNOV-BASED CONTROLLER; MAGNETO RHEOLOGICAL (MR) DAMPERS; MR DAMPERS; MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS; SAFE OPERATIONS; SEMI-ACTIVE DEVICES; STRUCTURAL VIBRATIONS; SUPPLY CURRENTS; SYSTEM PERFORMANCES;

BUILDINGS;

EID: 46749136074     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.218     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK. Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 1997; 17(6): 19-35.
2. Nishitani A, Inoue Y. Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1565-1574.
3. Datta TK. A state-of-the-art review on active control of structures. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 2003; 40(1):1-17.
4. Symans MD, Constantinou MC. Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures 1999; 21:469-487.
5. Lin PY, Chung LL, Loh CH. Semiactive control of building structures with semiactive tuned mass damper. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2005; 20:35-51.
6. Carlson D, Catanzarite DM, St Clair KA. Commercial magneto-rheological fluid devices. Internal Journal of Modern Physics, B 1996; 10(23-24):2857-2865.
7. Karkoub MA, Zribi M. Active/semi-active suspension control using magnetorheological actuators. International Journal of Systems Science 2006; 37(1):35-44.
8. Cho SW, Jung HJ, Lee IW. Smart passive system based on magnetorheological damper. Smart Materials and Structures 2005; 14:707-714.
9. Hiemenz GJ, Choi YT, Wereley NM. Seismic control of civil structures utilizing semi-active MR braces. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2003; 18:31-44.
10. Cho SW, Kim BW, Jung HJ, Lee IW. Implementation of modal control for seismically excited structures using magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2005; 131(2):177-184.
11. Wu JC, Yang JN. Modified sliding mode control for wind-excited benchmark problem. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2004; 130(4):499-504.
12. Choi KM, Cho SW, Jung HJ, Lee IW. Semi-active fuzzy control for seismic response reduction using magnetorheological dampers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:723-736.
13. Wang AP, Lee CD. Fuzzy sliding mode control for a building structure based on genetic algorithms. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:881-895.
14. Jansen LM, Dyke SJ. Semiactive control strategies for MR dampers: comparative study. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2000; 126(8):795-803.
15. Dyke SJ, Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK, Carlson JD. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Materials and Structures 1996; 5:565-575.
16. Yoshida O, Dyke SJ. Seismic control of a nonlinear benchmark building using smart dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2004; 130(4):386-392.
17. Djajakesukma SL, Samali B, Nguyen H. Study of a semi-active stiffness damper under various earthquake inputs. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1757-1776.
18. Gavin HP. Control of seismically excited vibration using electrorheological materials and Lyapunov methods: IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 2001; 9(1):27-36.
19. Alvarez L, Jiménez R. Semi-active control of civil structures using magnetorheological dampers. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, CO, June 2003; 1428-1433.
20. Kwok NM, Ha QP, Nguyen TH, Li J, Samali B. A novel hysteretic model for magnetorheological fluid dampers and parameter identification using particle swarm optimization. Sensors and Actuators A, Physical 2006; 132(2):441-451.
21. Djajakesukma SL, Samali B, Li J, Nguyen H. Modelling and identification of MR damper for semi-active control devices. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Saitama, Japan, August 2002; 1197-1202.
22. Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ, Sian MK, Carlson JD. Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1997; 123(3):230-238.
23. Slotine JE, Li W. Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
24. Ha QP. Sliding performance enhancement with fuzzy tuning. Electronics Letters 1997; 33:1421-1423.
25. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ. Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2004; 130(4):366-385.