메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 330-336

The case against conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN DEATH; CADAVER; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ETHICS; FAMILY; GRIEF; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TERMINAL CARE; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 46749128184     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: 14692147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180108080407     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)

References (11)
  • 1
    • 13644262140 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Spital A. Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: A stimulating idea whose time has not yet come. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005;14:107-12. See also Spital A, Erin CA. Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Let's at least talk about it. American Journal of Kidney Disease 2002;39:611-5; and Spital A, Taylor JS. Routine recovery of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Consistent, fair, and life-saving. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2007;2:300-3.
    • Spital A. Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: A stimulating idea whose time has not yet come. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005;14:107-12. See also Spital A, Erin CA. Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Let's at least talk about it. American Journal of Kidney Disease 2002;39:611-5; and Spital A, Taylor JS. Routine recovery of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Consistent, fair, and life-saving. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2007;2:300-3.
  • 2
    • 52949148785 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 1, Spital 2005:108.
    • See note 1, Spital 2005:108.
  • 3
    • 52949149914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 1, Spital, Taylor 2007:301.
    • See note 1, Spital, Taylor 2007:301.
  • 4
    • 52949129328 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • R. Veatch supports this position in cases of non-heart-beating cadaver donors in Transplantation Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000:Chap. 13.
    • R. Veatch supports this position in cases of non-heart-beating cadaver donors in Transplantation Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000:Chap. 13.
  • 5
    • 6044253804 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See Veatch R. Abandon the Dead Donor Rule or change the definition of death? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2004;14:261-76. Also, Fost N. Reconsidering the Dead Donor Rule: Is it important that organ donors be dead? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2004;14:249-60.
    • See Veatch R. Abandon the Dead Donor Rule or change the definition of death? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2004;14:261-76. Also, Fost N. Reconsidering the Dead Donor Rule: Is it important that organ donors be dead? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2004;14:249-60.
  • 6
    • 52949140420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • As distinct from donation after brain death, in donation after cardiocirculatory death the 5-minute wait is to allow for the possibility of autoresuscitation, the heart's ability to resume beating on its own
    • As distinct from donation after brain death, in donation after cardiocirculatory death the 5-minute wait is to allow for the possibility of autoresuscitation, the heart's ability to resume beating on its own.
  • 7
    • 0038804027 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Harris J. Wonderwoman and Superman: The Ethics of Human Biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992:103. Also, Harris J. Organ procurement: Dead interests, living needs. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:130-4.
    • Harris J. Wonderwoman and Superman: The Ethics of Human Biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992:103. Also, Harris J. Organ procurement: Dead interests, living needs. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:130-4.
  • 8
    • 52949127810 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action
    • Childress JF, Liverman CT, eds, Washington, DC: National Academies Press; :205-28
    • Childress JF, Liverman CT, eds. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action. A Report from the Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006:205-28.
    • (2006) A Report from the Institute of Medicine
  • 9
    • 27944443211 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are organs personal property or a societal resource?
    • Truog RD. Are organs personal property or a societal resource? American Journal of Bioethics 2005;5:14-6.
    • (2005) American Journal of Bioethics , vol.5 , pp. 14-16
    • Truog, R.D.1
  • 11
    • 33745789839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Also, Howard RJ. We have an obligation to provide organs for transplantation after we die. American Journal of Transplantation 2006;6:1786-9
    • Also, Howard RJ. We have an obligation to provide organs for transplantation after we die. American Journal of Transplantation 2006;6:1786-9.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.