Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: A stimulating idea whose time has not yet come

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 107-112

  Spital, Aaron ^a  

^a New York Organ Donor Network   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CADAVER DONOR; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 13644262140     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180105050127     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Jarvis R. Join the club: A modest proposal to increase availability of donor organs. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:199-204.
2. Jonsen AR. Transplantation of fetal tissue: An ethicist's viewpoint. Clinical Research 1988; 36:215-9, at 219.
3. Glannon W. Do the sick have a right to cadaveric organs? Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:153-6.
4. Harris J. Organ procurement: Dead interests, living needs. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29:130-4, at 132.
5. See note 4, Harris 2003. Also see Emson HE. It is immoral to require consent for cadaver organ donation. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:125-7.
6. See note 4, Harris 2003. Also see Emson HE. It is immoral to require consent for cadaver organ donation. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:125-7.
7. Harris J. Wonderwoman and Superman. The Ethics of Human Biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992:100-3, at 101.
8. See note 5, Emson 2003:126.
9. Peters DA. A unified approach to organ donor recruitment, organ procurement, and distribution. Journal of Law and Health 1989-90; 3:157-87, at 168.
10. See note 5, Emson 2003:125.