International graduate training, digital inequality and professional network structure: An ego-centric social network analysis of knowledge producers at the "global South"

Scientometrics

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 343-368

  Ynalvez, Marcus Antonius ^a,c   Shrum, Wesley ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Texas A and M International University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46749093718     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1936-0     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Beggs, J. J., Hurlbert, J. S. (1997), The social context of men's and women's job search ties: Membership in voluntary organizations, social resources, and job search outcomes, Sociological Perspectives, 40: 601-625.
2. Beggs, J. J., Hurlbert, J. S., Haines, V. A. (1996a), Revisiting the rural-urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings, Rural Sociology, 61: 306-325.
3. Beggs, J. J., Hurlbert, J. S., Haines, V. A. (1996b), Situational contingencies surrounding the receipt of informal support, Social Forces, 75: 201-222.
4. Bijker, W. E. (1995), Sociohistorical technology studies. In: Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., Pinch, T., (Eds)), pp. 229-256. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
5. Bijker, W. E. (1999), Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward A Theory of Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., Everett, M. G. (1998), Network measures of social capital, Connections, 21: 27-36.
7. Callon, M. (1995), Four models for the dynamics of science. In: Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., Pinch, T., (Eds), pp. 29-63. Sage Publication, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
8. Castells, M. (1989), The Informational Mode of Development and the Restructuring of Capitalism.
9. Castells, M. (2000), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd edit, 1, Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Malden, MA.
10. Castells, M. (2001), The Internet Galaxy. Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY.
11. Coleman, J. S. (1988), Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.
12. Collins, H. M. (1983), The sociology of scientific knowledge: studies of contemporary science, Annual Review of Sociology, 2: 265-285.
13. Collins, H. M. (2001), Tacit knowledge, trust and the q of sapphire, Social Studies of Science, 31: 71-85.
14. Crane, D. (1972), Invisible College: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Down, J. (2000), [Review of the Book Tracit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives] Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 170-173.
16. Ehikhamenor, F. A. (2003), Internet facilities: Use and non-use by Nigerian university scientists, Journal of Information Science, 29: 35-48.
17. Gieryn, T. F. (1995), Boundaries of science. In: Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., Pinch, T., (Eds)), pp. 393-443. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Granovetter, M. (1973), The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
19. Granovetter, M. (1974), Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Hurlbert, J. S., Beggs, J. J., Haines, V. A. (2001), Social networks and social capital in extreme environments. In: Social Capital: Theory and Research (Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R. S., (Eds)), pp. 209-231. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY.
21. Hurlbert, J. S., Haines, V. A., Beggs, J. J. (2000), Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in non-routine situations? American Sociological Review, 65: 598-618.
22. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995), Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In: Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., Pinch, T., (Eds). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Latour, B. (2002), We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Porter, C., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. MacKenzie, D., Spinardi, G. (1995), Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons, American Journal of Sociology, 101: 44-99.
25. Marsden, P. V. (1987), Core discussion networks of Americans, American Sociological Review, 52: 122-131.
26. Marsden, P. V. (1990), Network data and measurement, Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 435-463.
27. Marsden, P. V. (2003), Models and methods in social network analysis. In: Recent Developments in Network Measurements (Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S., (Eds)). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
28. McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L. (1987), Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the compositions of face-to-face groups, American Sociological Review, 52: 370-379.
29. McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J. M. (2001), Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415-444.
30. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Brashears, M. (2006), Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion network over two decades, American Sociological Review, 71: 353-375.
31. Neuman, W. L. (2006), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 6th edit, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
32. Olesko, K. M. (1993), Tacit knowledge and school formation. Osiris 2nd Series 8: 19-29.
33. Otte, E., Rousseau, R. (2002), Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28: 441-453.
34. Ritzer, G., Goodman, D. (2004), Sociological Theory. 6th edit, Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
35. Rogers, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, NY.
36. Sassen, S. (2000), Cities in a World Economy, Pine Forge Press.
37. Schott, T. (1993), World science: Globalization of institutions and participation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 18: 196-208.
38. Shrum, W., Bankston, C. (1993/1994), Organizational and geopolitical approaches to international science and technology networks. Knowledge and Policy, 6: 119-133.
39. Shrum, W., Beggs, J. (1997), Methodology for studying research networks in the developing world: Generating information for science and technology policy. Knowledge and Policy, 9: 62-85.
40. Sklair, L. (2001), The Transnational Capitalist Class, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
41. Smelser, N. J. (1997), Problematics of Sociology: The Georg Simmel Lectures, 1995, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
42. Smith-Lovin, L., Mcpherson, J. M. (1993), You are who you know: A network approach to gender. In: Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory (England, P., (Ed.)). Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
43. Stehr, N., Ed. (2000), Modern Societies as Knowledge Societies. Handbook of Social Theory. Edited by Ritzer & Smart. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
45. Wellman, B., Berkowitz. (1991), Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In: Social Structures: A Network Approach (Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S. D., (Eds)), pp. 19-62. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
46. Ynalvez, M., Duque, R. B., Mbatia, P., Sooryamoorthy, R., Palackal, A., Shrum, W. (2005), When do scientists "adopt" the internet? Dimensions of connectivity in developing areas. Scientometrics, 63: 39-67.
47. Ynalvez, M., Shrum, W. (2006), International training and the digital divide: Computer and email use in the Philippines. Perspective on Global Development and Technology, 5: 277-302.