Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems: A prospective 12-month study with DEXA

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 723-729

  Galli, Marco ^a,b   Leone, Antonio ^a   Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro ^a   Pirronti, Tommaso ^a   Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hip; Hip arthroplasty; Hip dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Hip radiography

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MATRIX; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE STRESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMORAL STEM; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STRESS SHIELDING PHENOMENON; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 46649109521     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0482-z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress-shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69 B: 45-55.
2. Summer DR, Galante JO. Determinants of stress shielding: design vs. materials vs. interface. Clin Orthop 1992; 274: 202-212.
3. Kerner J, Huiskes R, Van Lenthe GH, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B, Engh CA. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptative remodelling. J Biomech 1999; 32: 695-703.
4. Dickob M, Martini T. The cementless PM hip arthroplasty. Four-to-seven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 195-199.
5. Refior HJ, Parhofer R, Ungethum M, Blomer W. Special problems of cementless fixation of total hip-joint endoprostheses with reference to the PM type. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1988; 107: 158-171.
6. Wolf T, Reichelt A, Schlepckow P. Clinical results using the PM type of hip endoprosthesis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1988; 126: 637-642.
7. Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS, Lee SH. Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osseous ankylosed hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 414: 136-148.
8. Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE. Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 2001; 25: 89-92.
9. Nishii T, Sugano N, Masuhara K, Shibuya T, Ochi T, Tamura S. Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 339: 121-131.
10. Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M, et al. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodelling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 2003; 73: 115-121.
11. Soderman P, Malchau U. Is the Harris Hip Score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 189-197.
12. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990; 257: 107-128.
13. Engh CA, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74A: 1009-1020.
14. Engh CA, Bobyn ID. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 231: 7-28.
15. Kiratli BJ, Checovich MM, McBeath AA, Wilson MA, Heiner JP. Measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with the Wisconsin hip, an uncemented femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 184-193.
16. Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD. Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop 1996; 324: 269-274.
17. Kroger H, Miettinen H, Arnala I, Koski E, Rushton N, Suomalainen O. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 1526-1530.
18. West JD, Mayor MB, Collier JP. Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs: a study after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 58-64.
19. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17-27.
20. Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second-generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 109-114.
21. Kroon PO, Freeman MR. Hydroxyapatite coating of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74: 518-522.
22. Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 479-483.
23. Zerahn B, Storgaard M, Johansen T, Olsen C, Lausten G, Kanstrup IL. Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 1998; 22: 225-229.
24. Hughes SS, Furia JP, Smith P, Pellegrini VD Jr. Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. A quantitative comparison of cobalt-chromium and titanium femoral stems with use of dual x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 231-239.
25. Richardson ML, Genant HK, Cann CE, et al. Assessment of metabolic bone diseases by quantitative computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 195: 224-238.
26. Sabo D, Reiter A, Simank HG, Thomsen M, Lukoschek M, Ewerbeck V. Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA. Calcif Tissue Int 1998; 62: 177-182.
27. Venesmaa PK, Kroger HP, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry a 3-year follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 1056-1061.
28. Goh JC, Low SL, Bose K. Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1995; 57: 340-343.
29. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Binnington AG, Szivek JA. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: 393-408.
30. Jacobs JJ, Sumner DR, Galante JO. Mechanisms of bone loss associated with total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24: 583-590.
31. Paz Jimenez J, Hernandez Vaquero D, Murcia Mazon A, Amador Mellado J, Menendez Vinuela G, Rendueles C. The value of a densitometric follow-up in the evaluation of a total hip prosthesis. Rev Esp Cir Osteoart 1994; 173: 253-258.
32. Hernandez Vaquero D, Paz Jimenez J, Murcia Mazon A, Allegre Mateo R, Martinez Garcìa J, Pena Vazquez J. Behavior of the femoral stem in the Bihapro hip prosthesis. Orthopedics 1999; 22: 1049-1053.