Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) and activated carbon fibre (ACF) hybrid processes for chromate removal from wastewater

Desalination

Volumn 229, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 264-278

  Bade, Rabindra ^a   Lee, Seung Hwan ^a   Jo, Sungsik ^a   Lee, Hong Shin ^a   Lee, Sung eok ^a  

^a Kumoh National Institute of Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Activated carbon fibre; Cetylpyridinium chloride; Chromate; Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration; Ultrafiltration membrane

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; CARBON FIBERS; CHROMATES; CORROSION PREVENTION; PRESSURE; REMOVAL; SOLAR CONCENTRATORS; SOLUTIONS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER FILTRATION;

(001) PARAMETER; ACTIVATED CARBON FIBRES; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE (CTPC); CHROMATE CONCENTRATION; CHROMATE REMOVAL; HYBRID PROCESSING; MICELLAR ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION (MEUF); MOLAR RATIOS; OPERATING PARAMETERS; PERMEATE FLUXES; RETENTATE;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; CHLORIDE; CHROMATE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MEMBRANE; PH; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER;

EID: 46649091369     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mediana B.Y., Torem M.L., and Mesquita L.M.S. On the kinetics of precipitate flotation of Cr (III) using sodium dodesulphate and ethanol. Miner. Eng. 18 (2005) 225
2. Shrivastava R., Upreti R.K., Seth P.K., and Chaturvedi U.C. Effect of chromium on the immune system. FEMS Immunol. Med. Mic. 34 1 (2002) 1-7
3. Lawniczak S.L., Lecomte P., and Ehrhardt J.J. Behaviors of hexavalent chromium in a polluted ground water: Redox processes and immobilization in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 1350
4. Baek K., and Yang J.W. Cross-flow micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of nitrate and chromate: competitive binding. J. Hazard. Mater. 108 (2004) 119
5. Madoni P., Davoli D., Gorbi G., and Vescovi L. Toxic effect of heavy metals on the activated sludge protozoan community. Water Res 30 (1996) 135
6. Baek K., B.K., Cho H.J., and Yang J.W. Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 99 3 (2003) 303
7. Marvov V., Erwe T., Blocher C., and Chmiel H. Study of new integrated processes combining adsorption, membrane separation and flotation for heavy metal removal from wastewater. Desalination 157 (2003) 97
8. Bohdziewicz J., Bodzek M., and Wasik E. The application of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration to the removal of nitrates from ground water. Desalination 121 (1999) 139
9. Yang J.W., Baek K., Kim K.B., and Cho H.J. Water and Wastewater: Prospective of Developing Countries (2003), International Water Association, Delhi 1155
10. Purkait M.K., Gupta S.D., and De S. Resistance in series model for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of erosin dye. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 207 (2004) 459
11. Chai X., Chen G., Yue P.L., and Mi Y. Pilot scale membrane separation of electroplating waste by reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 123 (1997) 235
12. Keskinler B., Danis U., Cakici A., and Akay G. Chromate removal from water using surfactant enhanced cross-flow ultrafiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 32 (1997) 1899
13. Juang R.S.S., Xua Y.-Y., and Chen C.L. Separation and removal of metal ions from dilute solution using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 218 (2003) 257
14. Tung C.-C., Yang Y.M., Chang C.H., and Maa J.R. Removal of copper ions and dissolved phenol from water using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed surfactants. Waste Manage. 22 (2002) 695
15. Liao B.Q., Bagley D.M., Kraemer H.E., Leppard G.G., and Liss S.N. A review of biofouling and its control in membrane separation bioreactors. Water Environ. Res. 76 5 (2004) 425
16. Brasquet C., Subrenat E., and Le Cloirec P. Removal of phenolic compounds from aqueous solution by activated carbon clothes. Wat. Sci. Tech. 39 10-11 (1999) 201
17. Lu A.H., and Zheng J.T. Microstructures of polyacrylonotrile based carbon fibres (PAN-ACF) modified by catalytic benzene deposition. Carbon 40 (2002) 1353
18. Park S.J., and Kim Y.M. Influence of anoidic treatment on heavy metal ion removal by activated carbon fibres. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 278 (2004) 276
19. Gzara L., and Dhahbi M. Removal of chromate by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants. Desalination 137 (2001) 241
20. Ghosh G., and Bhattacharya P.K. Hexavalent chromium ion removal through micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 119 (2006) 45
21. Kweon J.H., and Lawler D.F. Fouling mechanisms in the integrated system with softening and ultrafiltration. Water Res. 38 (2004) 4164
22. Shon H.K., Vigneswaran S., Kim I.S., Cho J., and Ngo H.H. Effect of pretreatment on the fouling of membranes: application in biologically treated sewage effluent. J. Membr. Sci. 234 (2004) 111
23. Baek K., Kim B.K., and Yang J.W. Application of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for nutrient removal. Desalination 156 (2003) 137
24. Lipe K.M., Sabatini D.A., Hasegawa M.A., and Harwell J.H. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration and air stripping for surfactant contaminant separation and reuse, surfactants. Ground Water Monit. Rem. 16 1 (1996) 85
25. Liu C.-K., and Li C.-W. Adsorption of Cu(II), Ni (II), and Zn (II) on dye loaded groundnut shells and saw dust. Sep. Purif. Technol. 11 (2005) 1
26. Gagliardo P., Adham S., and Trusell R. Evaluation of an integrated membrane system for water repurification. Wat. Sci. Tech. 43 (2001) 19
27. Shin H., and Kang S. Performance and membrane fouling in a pilot scale SBR process coupled with membrane. Wat. Sci. Tech. 47 (2002) 139
28. Aggrawal D., Goyal M., and Bansal R.C. Adsorption of chromium by activated carbon from aqueous solution. Carbon 37 (1999) 1989