Comparison between sub-pixel classifications of MODIS images: Linear mixture model and neural network model

WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 161-168

  Roosta, Hasan ^a   Farhudi, Rahmatolah ^a   Afifi, Mohamad Ebrahim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Area fraction images; Land cover; Linear mixture model; Mixed pixel; MODIS time series; Neural network

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GPS; LAND COVER; MAPPING; MODIS; NDVI; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

ASIA; EURASIA; FARS; IRAN; MARVDASHT; MIDDLE EAST;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 46449108259     PISSN: 17905079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Sagardia, R., Use of subpixel classifier for wetland mapping: a case study of the Cuitzeo Lake, Mexico. Enschede, ITC, 65-78, 2005.
2. Lobell, D. B. and G. P. Asner, Moisture Effects on Soil Reflectance, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 66, 2002, pp. 722-727.
3. Campbell, J.B., Introduction to remote sensing. Taylor & Francis Ltd, London, 2nd edition, 1996.
4. Schoenmakers, R.P.H.M., Integrated methodology for segmentation of large optical satellite images in land applications of remote sensing. PhD thesis, Department of Informatics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1995
5. Irons, J.R., B.L. Markham, R.F. Nelson, D.L. Toll, D.L. Williams, R.S. Latty, and M.L. Stauffer, The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, VOL. 6(8), 1985, pp. 1385-1403.
6. Woodcock, C.E. and A.H. Strahler, The factor of scale in remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, VOL. 21, 1987, pp. 311-332.
7. Van der Meer, F., Spatial Statistics for Remote Sensing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, first edition, 1999.
8. Townshend, Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 1981, pp. 1075-1085.
9. Hartemink, R., World database, http://www.ngw.nl/indexgb.htm, 2002. Accessed 02-2007.
10. Dennison, P.E. and D.A. Roberts, The effects of vegetation phenology on endmember selection and species mapping in Southern California chaparral, Remote Sensing of Environment, VOL. 87, 2003, pp. 295-309.
11. Foody, G.M. and D.P. Cox, Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions, International Journal of Remote Sensing, VOL. 15, 1994, pp. 619-631.
12. Kavzoglu, T. and Mather, P.M., The use of back-propagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, VOL.24(23), 2003, pp. 4907-4938.