Current and new developments in spam filtering

Proceedings - 2006 IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2006 - Networking-Challenges and Frontiers

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 318-323

  Hunt, Ray ^a   Carpinter, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FILTRATION; INTERNET; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ROBOT LEARNING; SPAMMING; WAVE FILTERS; WEIGHT CONTROL;

ACADEMIC RESEARCHES; BAYESIAN FILTERING; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; MACHINE-LEARNING; NEW DEVELOPMENTS; NON-INTERACTIVE; POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS; RESEARCH PAPERS; SPAM FILTERING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 46449091853     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICON.2006.302641     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. J. Ioannidis. Fighting spam by encapsulating policy in email addresses. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, Feb 6-7 2003.
2. J. M. G. Hidalgo. Evaluating cost-sensitive unsolicited bulk email categorization. In SAC '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 615-620. ACM Press, 2002.
3. G. Cormack and T. Lynam. A study of supervised spam detection applied to eight months of personal e-mail. http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/spamcormack. html, July 1 2004.
4. F.D. Garcia, J.-H. Hoepman, and J. van Nieuwenhuizen. Spam filter analysis. In Proceedings of 19th IFIP International Information Security Conference, WCC2004-SEC, Toulouse, France, Aug 2004. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. K. Schneider. Anti-spam appliances are not better than software. NetworkWorldFusion, March 1 2004. http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2004/ 0301faceoffno.html.
6. R. Nutter. Software or appliance solution? NetworkWorldFusion, March 1 2004. http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2004/0301nutter.html.
7. T. Chiu. Anti-spam appliances are better than software. Network-WorldFusion, March 1 2004. www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2004/ 0301faceoffyes.html.
8. P. Graham. A plan for spam, http://paulgraham.com/spam.html, August 2002.
9. K. Yoshida, F. Adachi, T. Washio, H. Motoda, T. Homma, A. Nakashima, H. Fujikawa, and K. Yamazaki. Density-based spam detector. In KDD '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 486-493. ACM Press, 2004.
10. E. Damiani, S. De Capitani di Vimercati, S. Paraboschi, and P. Samarati. P2P-based collaborative spam detection and filtering. In P2P '04: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P'04), pages 176-183. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
11. A. Gray and M. Haadr. Personalised, collaborative spam filtering. In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, 2004.
12. J. Snyder. Spam in the wild, the sequel. http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/ 2004/122004spampkg.html, Dec 2004.
13. L.H. Gomes, C. Cazita, J. Almeida, V. Almeida, and Jr. W. Meira. Characterizing a spam traffic. In IMC '04: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 356-369. ACM Press, 2004.
14. S. Vaughan-Nichols. Saving private e-mail. Spectrum, IEEE, pages 40-44, Aug 2003.
15. W. Yerazunis. Sparse binary polynomial hashing and the crml 14 discriminator. In MIT Spam Conference, 2003.
16. C. Siefkes, F. Assis, S. Chhabra, and W. Yerazunis. Combining winnow and orthogonal sparse bigrams for incremental spam filtering. In Proceedings of ECML/PKDD 2004, LNCS. Springer Verlag, 2004.
17. H. Drucker, D. Wu, and V.N. Vapnik. Support vector machines for spam categorization, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10(5):1048-1054, Sep. 1999.
18. M. Woitaszek, M. Shaaban, and R. Czernikowski. Identifying junk electronic email in Microsoft outlook with a support vector machine. Symposium on Applications and the Internet, 2003, pages 166-169, 27-31 Jan. 2003.
19. G. Rios and H. Zha. Exploring support vector machines and random forests for spam detection. In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, 2004.
20. C. O'Brien and C. Vogel. Spam filters: Bayes vs. chi-squared; letters vs. words. In ISICT '03: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on information and communication technologies. Trinity College Dublin, 2003.
21. M. Ludlow. Just 150 'spammers' blamed for e-mail woe. The Sunday Times, 1 December 2002.
22. S. Chhabra, W. Yerazunis, and C. Siefkes. Spam filtering using a Markov random field model with variable weighting schemas. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 347-350, 1-4 Nov. 2004.
23. G. Sakkis, I. Androutsopoulos, G. Paliouras, V. Karkaletsis, C. Spyropoulos, and P. Stamatopoulos. A memory-based approach to anti-spam filtering. Technical report, DEMO 2001.
24. I. Androutsopoulos, G. Paliouras, V. Karkaletsis, G. Sakkis, C. Spyropoulos, and P. Stamatopoulos. Learning to filter spam email: A comparison of a naive Bayesian and a memory-based approach. In Workshop on Machine Learning and Textual Information Access, 4th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 2000.
25. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. van der Sloot, and A. van den Bosch. Timbl: Tilburg memory based learner, version 3.0, reference guide. ILK, Computational Linguistics, Tilburg University, http://ilk.kub.nl/~ilk/papers, 2000.
26. P. Cunningham, N. Nowlan, S. Delany, and M. Haahr. A case-based approach to spam filtering that can track concept drift. In ICCBR'03 Workshop on Long-Lived CBR Systems, June 2003.
27. I. Rigoutsos and T. Huynh. Chung-kwei: a pattern-discovery-based system for the automatic identification of unsolicited e-mail messages (spam). Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, 2004.
28. G. Sakkis, I. Androutsopoulos, G. Paliouras, V. Karkaletsis, C.D. Spyropoulos, and P. Stamatopoulos. Stacking classifiers for anti-spam filtering of e-mail. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 44-50, 2001
29. I. Androutsopoulos, J. Koutsias, K. Chandrinos, G. Paliouras, and C. Spyropoulos. An evaluation of naive Bayesian anti-spam filtering. In Proc. of the workshop on Machine Learning in the New Information Age, 2000.
30. I. Androutsopoulos, J. Koutsias, K. Chandrinos, and C. Spyropoulos. An experimental comparison of naive Bayesian and keyword-based anti-spam filtering with personal e-mail messages. In SIGIR '00: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 160-167. ACM Press, 2000.
31. X. Carreras and L. Marquez. Boosting trees for anti-spam email filtering. In Proceedings of RANLP-01, 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Tzigov Chark, BG, 2001.
32. R. Hunt and A. Cournane. An analysis of the tools used for the generation and prevention of spam. Computers and Security, 23(2):154-166, 2004.
33. B. Leiba, J. Ossher, V. Rajan, R. Segal, and M. Wegman. SMTP path analysis. 2005.
34. L. Pelletier, J. Almhana, and V. Choulakian. Adaptive filtering of spam. 2nd Annual Conference on Communication Networks and Services Research, pages 218-224, 19-21 May 2004.
35. P.O. Boykin and V. Roychowdhury. Personal email networks: An effective anti-spam tool. MIT Spam Conference, Jan 2005.
36. J. Golbeck and J. Hendler. Reputation network analysis for email filtering. In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, 2004.
37. W. S. Yerazunis. The Spam-Filtering Accuracy Plateau at 99.9% accuracy and how to get past it. Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/fairuce, Dec 2004
38. FairUCE. www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/fairuce, Nov 2004