Magnetic-field induced triplet superconductivity in the repulsive Hubbard model on the triangular lattice

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 533-536

  Arita, Ryotaro ^a   Kuroki, Kazuhiko ^b   Aoki, Hideo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamical cluster approximation; Hubbard model; Magnetic field; Spin fluctuation; Triplet superconductivity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; DYNAMICS; ELECTRON; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MONTE CARLO METHOD; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 4644365273     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.73.533     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. I. J. Lee, A. P. Hope, M. J. Leone and M. J. Naughton: Synth. Met. 70 (1995) 747.
2. I. J. Lee, M. J. Naughton, G. M. Danner and P. M. Chaikin: Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3555.
3. I. J. Lee, P. M. Chaikin and M. J. Naughton: Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) R14669.
4. H. Tou, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, H. Kimura, Y. Onuki, E. Yamamoto and K. Maezawa: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1374.
5. G. M. Luke, Y. Fudamoto, K. M. Kojima, M. I. Larkin, J. Merrin, B. Nachumi, Y. J. Uemura, Y. Maeno, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Mori, H. Nakamura and M. Sigrist: Nature 394 (1998) 558.
6. K. Ishida, H. Mukuda, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Mori and Y. Maeno: Nature 396 (1998) 658.
7. K. A. Brueckner, T. Soda, P. W. Anderson and P. Morel: Phys. Rev. 118 (1960) 1442.
8. P. W. Anderson and W. F. Brinkman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1108.
9. D. Fay and J. Appel: Phys. Rev. B 22 (1980) 3173, and references therein.
10. S. S. Saxena, P. Agarwal, K. Ahilan, F. M. Grosche, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, M. J. Steiner, E. Pugh, I. R. Walker, S. R. Julian, P. Monthoux, G. G. Lonzarich, A. Huxley, I. Sheikin, D. Braithwaite and J. Flouquet: Nature 406 (2000) 587.
11. C. Pfleiderer, M. Uhlarz, S. M. Hayden, R. Vollmer, H. von Lohneysen, N. R. Bernhoeft and G. G. Lonzarich: Nature 412 (2001) 58.
12. D. Aoki, A. Huxley, E. Ressouche, D. Braithwaite, J. Flouquet, J. P. Brison, E. Lhotel and C. Paulsen: Nature 413 (2001) 613.
13. R. Arita, K. Kuroki and H. Aoki: Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 14585.
14. R. Arita, K. Kuroki and H. Aoki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69 (2000) 1181.
15. P. Monthoux and G. G. Lonzarich: Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 054529.
16. P. Monthoux and G. G. Lonzarich: Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 14598.
17. As for the magnetic anisotropy in the spin fluctuations with finite wave numbers, T. Kuwabara and M. Ogata [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4586]
18. z = 0) channel.
19. T. R. Kirkpatrick, D. Belitz, T. Vojta and R. Narayanan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 127003.
20. T. R. Kirkpatrick and D. Belitz: Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003) 024515.
21. c in 3D systems is similar to that in 2D systems. There, the frequency spread of spin fluctuations is assumed to scale with the bandwidth, while the FLEX result indicates that the spread scales with t.
22. While we have to incorporate a weak three-dimesionality to have finite transition temperatures, approximations in 2D systems should work better for the pairing since the coherence length is expected to be greater than the magnetic correlation length.
23. There are a variety of exotic magnetic-field-induced organic superconductors: see J. A. Symington et al.: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12 (2000) L641;
24. S. Uji et al.: Nature 410 (2001) 908;
25. N. Harrison et al.: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 (2001) L389.
26. K. Kuroki and R. Arita: Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 174507.
27. 2.
28. M. H. Hettler, A. N. Tahvildar-Zadch, M. Jarrell, T. Pruschke and H. R. Krishnamurthy: Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 7475.
29. M. H. Hettler, M. Mukherjee, M. Jarrell and H. R. Krishnamurthy: Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 12739.
30. Th. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. Pruschke and J. Keller: Eur. Phys. J. B 13 (2000) 613.
31. M. Jarrell, Th. Maier, C. Huscroft and S. Moukouri: Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 195130.
32. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth and M. J. Rozenberg: Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 13.
33. J. E. Hirsch and R. M. Fye: Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2521.
34. The interaction can modify the shape of the Fermi surface, but ref. 23 shows that the Fermi surface (as identified from the contour of Green's function) for the triangular lattice remains disconnected for dilute band filling when the Hubbard U is switched on.
35. R. Hlubina, S. Sorella and F. Guinea: Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 1343.
36. R. Arita, K. Kuroki and H. Aoki: Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 3207.
37. spin which has been defined as the derivative with respect to h.