Differential relations between general cognitive ability and interest-vocation fit

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 385-402

  Reeve, Charlie L ^a   Heggestad, Eric D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644355915     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/0963179041752673     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.
2. Austin, J. T., & Hanisch, K. A. (1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: A longitudinal analysis using Project TALENT data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 77-86.
3. Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1994). An evaluation of interest congruence indices: Distribution characteristics and measurement properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 310-327.
4. Camp, C. C., & Chartrand, J. M. (1992). A comparison and evaluation of interest congruence indices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41, 146-182.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dawis, R. V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 39, 7-19.
7. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Duncan, O. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In A. J. Reiss, O. D. Duncan, P. K. Hatt, & C. C. North (Eds.), Occupations and social status (pp. 109-138). New York: Free Press.
9. Flanagan, J. C., Dailey, J. T., Shaycoft, M. F., Gorham, W. A., Orr, D. B., & Goldberg, I. (1962). Design for a study of American youth. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Fouad, N. A. (2002). Cross-cultural differences in vocational interests: Between-groups differences on the Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 283-289.
11. Gemmill, G., & Oakley, J. (1992). The meaning of boredom in organizational life. Group and Organizational Management, 17, 358-369.
12. Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland occupational codes. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Gottfredson, L. S. (1980). The construct validity of Holland's occupational typology in terms of prestige, census, Department of Labor, and other classification systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 697-714.
14. Gottfredson, L. S. (1986). Occupational Aptitude Patterns Map: Development and implications for a theory of job aptitude requirements. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 254-291.
15. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132.
16. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Snow, R. E. (1997). Ability profiles. In R. F. Dillion (Ed.), Handbook on testing (pp. 107-135). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
17. Hackett, G., Lent, R. W., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1991). Advances in vocational theory and research: A 20-year retrospective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 3-38.
18. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
19. Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 6, 35-45.
20. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
23. Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172-178.
24. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York, NY: Free Press.
25. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
27. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009.
28. Lowman, R. L., Williams, R. E., & Leeman, G. E. (1985). The structure and relationship of college women's primary abilities and vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 298-315.
29. Lubinski, D. (2000). Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: 'Sinking shafts at a few critical points'. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 405-444.
30. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150.
31. McCormick, E., DeNisi, A., & Shaw, J. (1979). Use of the position analysis questionnaire for establishing the job component validity of tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 51-56.
32. McLaughlin, D. H. & Tiedeman, D. V. (1974). Eleven-year career stability and changes as reflected in project talent data through the Flanagan, Holland, and Roe occupational classification systems. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 5, 177-196.
33. Prediger, D. J. (1999). Basic structure of work-relevant abilities. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 46, 173-184.
34. Prediger, D. J. (2000). Holland's hexagon is alive and well - though somewhat out of shape: Response to Tinsley. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 197-204.
35. Randahl, G. J. (1991). A typological analysis of the relations between measured vocational interests and abilities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 333-350.
36. Reeve, C. L., & Hakel, M. D. (2000). Toward understanding adult intellectual development: Investigating within-individual convergence of interest and knowledge profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 897-908.
37. Scarr, S. (1996). How people make their own environments: Implications for parents and policy makers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 204-228.
38. Schmidt, D. B., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1998). Validity of assessing educational-vocational preference dimensions among intellectually talented 13-year-olds. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 45, 436-453.
39. Schneider, B., Kristof-Brown, A., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1997). What is this thing called fit? In N. Anderson & P. Harriot (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 393-412). Chichester: Wiley.
40. Strong, E. K. Jr (1943). Vocational interests of men and women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41. Tiedeman, D. V. (1972). The Project TALENT data bank: A handbook. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
42. Tracey, T. G. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft Fortran program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168.
43. Tracey, T. G., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246.
44. Wilk, S. L., Desmarais, L. B., & Sackett, P. R. (1995). Gravitation to jobs commensurate with ability: Longitudinal and cross-sectional tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 79-85.
45. Wilk, S. L., & Sackett, P. R. (1996). Longitudinal analysis of ability-job complexity fit and job change. Personnel Psychology, 49, 937-967.
46. Wise, L. L., McLaughlin, D. H., & Steel, L. (1979). The Project TALENT data bank handbook. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.