How thrombus model impacts the in vitro study of interventional thrombectomy procedures

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 641-648

  Krueger, Karsten ^a   Deissler, Patrick ^a   Coburger, Silke ^a   Fries, Jochen W U ^b   Lackner, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Experimental model; In vitro thrombus; Thrombectomy; Thrombolysis; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

FIBRIN; THROMBIN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; BLOOD CLOTTING; CATHETER; EX VIVO STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STORAGE TEMPERATURE; THROMBECTOMY; THROMBOGENESIS; THROMBUS; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 4644314475     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000139009.65226.17     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wagner HJ, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Pitton MB, et al. Rapid thrombectomy with a hydrodynamic catheter: results from a prospective, multicenter trial. Radiology. 1997;205:675-681.
2. Douek PC, Gandjbakhche A, Leon MB, et al. Functional properties of a prototype rheolytic catheter for percutaneous thrombectomy: in vitro investigations. Invest Radiol. 1994;29:547-552.
3. Wildberger JE, Schmitz-Rode T, Schubert H, et al. Percutaneous venous thrombectomy with the use of a balloon sheath: first in vitro investigations of a new low-tech concept. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:352-358.
4. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Brossmann J, Jahnke T, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy of major and massive pulmonary embolism with use of the Amplatz thrombectomy device. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:317-322.
5. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Grimm J, Suwelack D, et al. Mechanical assistance for enhancement of in vitro effectiveness for hydrodynamic thrombectomy. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:669-677.
6. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Schwarzenberg H, Bathe M, et al. In vitro effectiveness study for hydrodynamic thrombectomy devices of the second generation. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:477-484.
7. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Bangard C, Schwarzenberg H, et al. In vitro effectiveness study of three hydrodynamic thrombectomy devices. Radiology. 1999;211:433-439.
8. Ritchie JL, Hansen DD, Vracko R, et al. Mechanical thrombolysis: a new rotational catheter approach for acute thrombi. Circulation. 1986;73:1006-1012.
9. Schmitz-Rode T, Gunther RW, Pfeffer JG, et al. Acute massive pulmonary embolism: use of a rotatable pigtail catheter for diagnosis and fragmentation therapy. Radiology. 1995;197:157-162.
10. Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Cines DB, Sehgal CM. Catheter-delivered ultrasound potentiates in vitro thrombolysis. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;7:313-320.
11. Steffen W, Fishbein MC, Luo H, et al. High intensity, low frequency catheter-delivered ultrasound dissolution of occlusive coronary artery thrombi: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1571-1579.
12. Nishioka T, Luo H, Fishbein MC, et al. Dissolution of thrombotic arterial occlusion by high intensity, low frequency ultrasound and dodecafluoropentane emulsion: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:561-568.
13. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Bathe M, Grimm J, et al. Enhancement of in vitro effectiveness for hydrodynamic thrombectomy devices: simultaneous high-pressure rt-PA application. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:536-542.
14. Wildberger J, Schmitz-Rode T, Wein BB, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in hemodialysis access shunts using a 5F pigtail rotation catheter: in vitro and in vivo investigations. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:489-495.
15. Overgaard K, Sereghy T, Frellsen M, et al. Composition of emboli influences the efficacy of thrombolysis with rt-PA in a rat stroke model. Fibrinolysis. 1993;7:141-148.
16. Brosh D, Miller HI, Herz I, et al. Ultrasound angioplasty: an update review. Int J Cardiovasc Interv. 1998;1:11-18.
17. Busch E, Kruger K, Hossmann KA. Improved model of thromboembolic stroke and rt-PA induced reperfusion in the rat. Brain Res. 1997;778:16-24.
18. Kilic E, Hermann DM, Hossmann KA. A reproducible model of thromboembolic stroke in mice. Neuroreport. 1998;9:2967-2970.
19. Woolf N. Thrombosis. In: McGee JD, Isaacson P, Wright N, eds. Oxford Textbook of Pathology. Tokyo: Oxford University Press; 1992:508-516.
20. Robbins S, Cotran R. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1974.
21. Qian Z, Kvamme P, Raghed D, et al. Comparison of a new recirculation thrombectomy catheter with other devices of the same type: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:503-511.
22. Kruger K, Deissler P, Zahringer M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound thrombolysis for recanalization of peripheral arteries: evaluation of an in vitro model and results of a pilot-study. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 2002;174:1261-1268.
23. Ariani M, Fishbein MC, Chae JS, et al. Dissolution of peripheral arterial thrombi by ultrasound. Circulation. 1991;84:1680-1688.
24. Dick A, Neuerburg J, Schmitz-Rode T, et al. Thrombolysis of mural thrombus by ultrasound: an experimental in vitro study. Invest Radiol. 1998;33:85-90.
25. Jiang Q, Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, et al. Diffusion-, T2-, and perfusion-weighted nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of middle cerebral artery embolic stroke and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator intervention in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18:758-767.
26. Sereghy T, Overgaard K, Boysen G. Neuroprotection by excitatory amino acid antagonist augments the benefit of thrombolysis in embolic stroke in rats. Stroke. 1993;24:1702-1708.
27. Kaneko D, Nakamura N, Ogawa T. Cerebral infarction in rats using homologous blood emboli: development of a new experimental model. Stroke. 1985;16:76-84.
28. Stahr P, Rupprecht HJ, Voigtlander T, et al. A new thrombectomy catheter device (AngioJet) for the disruption of thrombi: an in vitro study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47:381-389.
29. Chandler AB. In vitro thrombolytic coagulation of the blood thrombus. Lab Invest. 1958;7:110-114.